Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
Both of these are thus translated through Aristotle's health component in his enumeration of elements that could make a person happy. One's health will be affected if the toilets at work are dirty, as well as if the working conditions do not ensure the physical security of the individual. This means that when applying for a job, the individual will look first of all at these elements before deciding whether the respective position may have some of the other elements Aristotle mentions in order for him to be a happy employee.
Many of the other components of Aristotle's enumeration of what happiness is about belong to the fourth and fifth levels in Maslow's pyramid of needs. Most notably, these are related to the capacity of the respective office or workplace to offer the individual the ability to exercise his intellectual and moral skills and to be recognized by his fellow workers, as well as by his management. The fourth and fifth levels of Maslow's pyramid include esteem and self-actualization. With self-actualization, things are taken even a bit beyond Aristotle's approach, beyond the need to exercise moral and individual skills and into the need to constantly improve these. Other elements from Aristotle are probably not discoverable in the workplace, most notably good friends, due to the arguments previously presented.
The justice element as Aristotle sees it should also be briefly argued from the approach that the company takes towards outside individuals. This can be connected to the way the involvement of the employees can actually be considered an unjust act or simply an act for which they cannot be responsible, since it was the company's decision. To exemplify, the company can decide to launch an insufficiently tested product on the market in order to increase revenues during a certain period of time.
From the managerial perspective, the act can be considered unjust according to Aristotelian thought because this is an action that can create harm (and, thus, a potential loss) for the recipients of this action, the customers. On the other hand, the employees can also be considered as doing an unjust act, because, despite the fact that they knew of an unjust act, they continued to take part in it. It is difficult, however, to assume that the unjust act could be stopped if employees decided to leave the company or anything similar.
However, the interesting fact is that the company's main objective is profit maximization. From that perspective, the shareholders might consider the act just, according to their own interests. They might argue that, in fact, the product could in no way be harmful for the consumers and that the studies that had supposed this was so are not true. This is something that Aristotle does not take into consideration: the relativity of moral norms and the way this might affect the just or unjust value of a certain action of an individual.
As this paper has aimed to present and discuss, Aristotle is still very much actual through many of his thoughts and ideas on notions such as happiness, justice or friendship. Even if one takes these and projects them into a limited space, one with its own traditions and actions and one that is also occasionally governed by different sets of rules, the relationship between individuals can still be considered as falling under the categories of friendship that Aristotle presents or relating to the idea of justice, present in his work on ethics.
However, the complexity of the current society and the vast volatility of interactions between individuals quite often mean that additional elements will need to be brought into discussion in order to have a complete picture. The fact that some companies do not allow romantic relationship in the office is not necessarily related to the fact that management is unjust, not even by Aristotelian standards. It could, however, mean that the interest of the company could be undermined by such a relationship. Through such an explanation, the act itself could appear as being just.
1. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by W.D. Ross. On the Internet at http://virtuescience.com/nicomachean-ethics.html. Last retrieved on October 5, 2009[continue]
These [bad effects of pleasure and pain] are the reason why people actually define the virtues as ways of being unaffected and undisturbed [by pleasures and pains]" (1104b21-25) It is not imperative to remain indifferent or unaffected by both pleasure and pain to be virtuous, it is only essential that we have the right feelings of pleasure and pain at the right time. Therefore, he goes on defining virtue as
If this was the case, and this transformation of reasoning did occur, then that person would be truly virtuous. There are many strengths to Aristotle's argument, as well. One of the main strengths is the discussion of the two kinds of virtue - the kind that comes from habit, and the kind that comes from learning. This would work to demonstrate why some people change so much as they grow
While the judges can be considered responsible for hamartia, Socrates himself is also accountable for hamartia when considering that he plays an important role in influencing the judges in wanting to put him to death. He actually has a choice, but he is reluctant to adopt an attitude that would induce feelings related to mercy. Ethos is also a dominant concept across Socrates' discourse, as he apparently believed that by influencing
Aristotle's View Of Friendship Aristotle views friendship as one of the most necessary and integral components to life, something sought after by all men. He goes so far as to imply that without friendship, life is not worth living at all. Friendship is described by Aristotle as one of the most important human needs, more so than power, status or prestige and is held in higher regard than these things by
The material cause refers to that substance out of which a thing is constructed. The formal cause is the idea of the thing in the mind of the creator who sets about creating that particular thing. The efficient cause is the Agent - or the being that creates the thing. The final cause is the purpose for which the thing has been created. Mere potentiality does not exist on its
3. Aristotle's Theory of Change In his Theory of Change, Aristotle attempts to explore the nature of how ad why things evolve, or change in form from one object or concept to another. One of the greatest wonders of man, which is still even debates today, is he process of how things evolve to be. Well, Aristotle presented his Theory of Change to account for how and why objects develop into
Specifically, in his condoning the institution of human slavery (Politics, I. 4 - I. 8), and in the obvious assumptions within his definition of "citizenship" rights in connection with his beliefs about the relative authority of female intellect (Politics, I. 13 -- I. 14). The Concept of State Constitutions Aristotle argues that the ideal set of values of society as represented in the state constitution are those that are the product
"Aristotle's Ideas And Thoughts On" (2009, October 05) Retrieved October 21, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/aristotle-ideas-and-thoughts-on-18878
"Aristotle's Ideas And Thoughts On" 05 October 2009. Web.21 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/aristotle-ideas-and-thoughts-on-18878>
"Aristotle's Ideas And Thoughts On", 05 October 2009, Accessed.21 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/aristotle-ideas-and-thoughts-on-18878