Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Often, any problematic conditions also improve for the company that was acquired, although this is not always the case.
For companies that acquire other companies for brand name recognition, there can be more of a struggle, and it is often one of confusion. If the acquiring company changes the acquired company's name it has lost the brand recognition that it bought the company for. If it does not change the name of the company, many people might not know that anything took place, and that can be detrimental to people who might not have liked the old company but do like the acquiring company - and will, therefore, give the old company another chance. Quite often the acquiring company ends up saying 'X, a Y-company brand' or something similar, and it just becomes cumbersome and annoying. There are very few ways to avoid one of those scenarios and because...
It is far from the best reason to acquire another company (Ledermark, 2001).
Gaining competitive skills in an ever-changing marketplace and gaining financial from the acquisition of another company are by far the best choices when it comes to why a company should acquire one of its rivals or a company working in a similar field that the acquiring company wishes to move into, thereby gaining market share and improving the position held in the mind of the consumer.
Bibliography
Ledermark. 2001. After the financial services merger: The power of integration. http://www.ledermark.com/Newsletter_May_2001.pdf.
Stopper, William G. 1999. Mergers and acquisitions: Fulfilling the Promise. HR Human Resource Planning.
Bibliography
Ledermark. 2001. After the financial services merger: The power of integration. http://www.ledermark.com/Newsletter_May_2001.pdf.
Stopper, William G. 1999. Mergers and acquisitions: Fulfilling the Promise. HR Human Resource Planning.
Business Strategies and Objectives The aim of this paper is to prepare matrices that will be used to justify strategies that will be recommended in the paper. There will also be analysis and detailed discussion on other alternative strategies, including providing the advantages and disadvantages of the alternative strategies. All the specific objectives and strategies will be addressed and there will be an analysis for the next three years with estimated
The most long-term source of integration difficulties however will be in aligning domestic vs. international channel partners, specifically on the issue of synchronizing demand forecasts to the shared Altria Group supply chain. The need for making the Collaborative Planning, Forecasting & Replenishment (CPFR) process which is used for coordinating the demand for tobacco through its many suppliers and procurement partners as efficient as possible (Bowe, 2007) is both a process-
Most critical is the ability to capitalize on core competencies while also alleviating any cultural conflicts inherent in pursuing any diversification strategy (Doving, Gooderham, 2008). Related diversifications are related to core competencies can be seen in many industry value chains, especially in the financial services industry (Milberg, 2008). As related diversifications reduce the cultural, system and process risk of a merger or acquisition, they have been proven empirically to
More than 44% of users see noticeable indications of benefits from laser treatment within the first 6 weeks. Another 45% see results in 6 to 12 weeks. The remainder sees less dramatic results after 12 weeks. (White Cliffs 2008) 2.3: New Business Strategy Parnell proposes a number of questions regarding business strategy, including "Is strategy-making an art or science? Should a strategy be publicized or kept largely secret? Is consistency or flexibility more important?
875). Often success introduces complacency, rigidity, and over confidence that eventually erode a firm's capability and product relevance. Arie de Geus (1997) identified four main traits for a successful firm; the first is the ability to change with a changing environment (Lovas & Ghoshal, 2000, p.875). A successful firm is capable of creating community vision, purpose, and personality, and it is able to develop and maintain working relationships. Lastly, a
The localization strategy into Vietnam is also characterized by the fact that it ensures higher levels of business diversification for the company, which in fact serves the number one rule of investments -- portfolio diversification. This in essence means that, through the penetration of the Vietnamese market, the company would increase its sources of revenues and it would decrease its dependency on the more traditional manufacturing plants. Finally, the localization strategy