Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
Trying to arrange away conflict and difference in a dynamic atmosphere necessitates great quantities of energy, and will also repress any affirmative results that may come from variance, such as enhanced decision-making and novelty (Organizational Leadership Managing Conflict, Power and Politics, 2004).
The functional view of organizational conflict sees conflict as a creative power, one that can inspire associates of the company to augment their information and skills, and their involvement to company originality and output. This advance considers that the keys to organization achievement lie not in arrangement, clearness and organization, but in originality, receptiveness and compliance. The triumphant company needs conflict so that deviating views can be put on the table, and new manners of doing things can be produced. The functional view of conflict also proposes that conflict supplies individuals with feedback about how things are going. On the other hand, this necessitates that conflict not be subdued, since efforts to suppress are more likely to produce very ugly conditions (Organizational Leadership Managing Conflict, Power and Politics, 2004).
Ugly takes place when the boss and perhaps workers try to get rid of or repress conflict in circumstances where it is impracticable to do so. Ugly takes place in a company when:
A lot of conflicts go on for a long time
People have given up on deciding and dealing with conflict troubles
There is a good amount of argumentative but little effort to fix the trouble
Employees show little concern in working to universal goals, but spend more time and force on defending themselves
When one gets ugly taking place in companies, there is a propensity to look to the boss or formal leader as being accountable for the disorder. This is how most workers would look at the circumstances. It is true that executives and supervisors play vital roles in figuring out how conflict is dealt with handle in the company, but it is also accurate that the evading of ugliness must be a collective liability (Organizational Leadership Managing Conflict, Power and Politics, 2004).
When a conflict situation happens, the choice of how to respond is a significant one. There are five things a person can use to deal with conflict:
Dominating - when the people concerned try to attain their own goals with little or no apprehension for the objective or interests of the other party. Conflict is seen as a someone must win and someone must lose circumstance.
Integrating - when each of the parties in the conflict tries to find an answer that suits the objectives of all those involved in the conflict. This is seen as a search for a win-win solution.
Compromising - when there is no obvious winner and loser, but each person tries to give up a little. Neither person attains all their objectives.
Avoiding - when one or both people declines to distinguish that conflict exists or rejects to become involved in an effort to resolve the conflict. Avoidance may be accomplished by the bodily separation of the people concerned or by repressing any open exhibit of conflict. Neither person's objectives are addressed there is no alteration in the fundamental condition causing the conflict.
Obliging - when one person to the disagreement places the objectives of the other person above their own interests. Conflict is dealt with by one person giving in to the other.
There are occasions when conflict and disagreements are useful to the company: when originality is necessary; when there are only adequate assets to support some planned projects but not all; when it is significant to find the best player probable; and when training for upcoming demanding and conflict ridden circumstances is necessary (Wagner III, Wagner and Hollenbeck, 2010).
Power, politics and conflict are all things that are found in all companies. It is how these things are managed that will determine whether the company is successful or not. Political behaviors can help to determine company success along with the direction that they want to go. Power is important in order for things to get done. It is important though that power be managed correctly in order for everyone in the company to be effective. Conflict in a company can be a good thing or a bad thing. If the conflict is dysfunctional it will only bring everyone down and no work will be accomplished. People will spend more time focused on the conflict and less on doing what they are supposed to be doing. If the conflict is functional then good things can happen. Disagreement often leads to creativity and thus success. Ugly can occur when conflict takes place in situations in which it is not appropriate. It is the responsibility of the manager to take control of these situations so that they don't get completely out of control. When there is nothing but chaos then productively suffers greatly. It is because of the fact that there are so many facets of these concepts understanding them is consequently critical to managerial achievement and an organizations continued existence in today's business world.
Baligh, Helmy H. (2006). Organization structures: theory and design, analysis and prescription.
New York: Springer Science & Business Media, Inc.
Organizational Leadership Managing Conflict, Power and Politics. (2004). Retrieved March 11,
2011, from Web site:
Power, Politics, and Conflict. (2002). Retrieved March 11, 2011, from Web site:
Wagner III, John a., Wagner, John a. And Hollenbeck, John R. (2010).Organizational Behavior:
Securing Competitive Advantage. New York:…[continue]
"Business Theory Power Politics And" (2011, March 12) Retrieved December 7, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/business-theory-power-politics-and-3778
"Business Theory Power Politics And" 12 March 2011. Web.7 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/business-theory-power-politics-and-3778>
"Business Theory Power Politics And", 12 March 2011, Accessed.7 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/business-theory-power-politics-and-3778
As the proceedings of the past few years have shown, these labors, regrettably, have not prevented companies from engaging in unethical behaviors that lead to larger corporate disgraces. As a result there is augmented force to make accessible more structured power and ethics programs so that companies are more accountable to the societies in which they function. Understanding the setting of business ethics can be very difficult. The field is
Business Environment Interaction of the Business Environment The environment of a company is much like the natural world in that there are many layers to any single organization (Marques, 2007). Political forces are present because there are factions and beliefs within a company which cause different politics to be formed. The economics of running an organization are a different facet of the environment which many consider the most important part of the
power influences people the most? David A. Hilton, M Ed., MBA Hoffmann Which type of power influences people most? Strategic management -- theory vs. practice In theory, strategic management is a very straightforward process. It involves defining a mission and establishing the tactical goals necessary to achieve the mission objectives. Establishing the tactical plan involves analyzing the internal and external company environment and defining a vision, business model, and appropriate strategy that aligns strengths
One set of concepts from each area was utilized to explain how the situation at Grand Bois may have come about. The end goal of the authors was to "provide business practitioners, ethics teachers, and readers interested in corporate conduct with insights useful in understanding why managers may act the way they do." It could be argued, according to Hamilton and Berken (2005), that Exxon managers had made a sound
Business Management Jack Watson Organizational Change Solgar is one of the foremost manufacturers of vitamin, mineral and herbal supplements in the nation. It has a long history of providing quality products to consumers who are interested in alternative methods for improving health and treating ailments. Throughout its history, Solgar has been faced with a number of changes that have fundamentally altered the way in which business is conducted. From the passage of legislation
Conclusions The five forces model is well-designed but it is far from perfect, especially for the manager not proficient in its use. The model is complex and is subject to a fairly steep learning curve. A tremendous amount of data must be collected to use the model effectively, and the analysis needs to be conducted in an objective manner. Many recent criticisms reflect the viewpoint that the model does not apply
Team building, group dynamics, talent management, leadership development, and any number of other functional areas are much more about clarity, focus, aligning expectations, and defining roles than creating equality" (Myatt, 2012). In the last twenty years, organizations have come to the realization that the better their employees are at working together, the more successful their organizations will be. Reductions in budgets in the public sector mean that there is an