Capitalism And Socialism The Two Dominant Economic Essay

PAGES
2
WORDS
723
Cite

Capitalism and Socialism The two dominant economic systems we have in the world today are socialism and capitalism. In this text, I will in addition to comparing and contrasting socialism and capitalism also discuss the shortcomings of these two economic systems. Further, amongst other things, I will highlight the overlaps between the two.

Capitalism vs. Socialism

In seeking to highlight the key differences between socialism and capitalism, it would be prudent to first offer a concise definition of the two terms. Capitalism in the words of Brinkerhoff, White, Ortega, and Weitz (2007) "is the economic system in which most wealth (land, capital, and labor) is private property, to be used by its owners to maximize their own gain." As the authors in this case further point out, this particular economic system is largely founded on competition. Socialism on the other hand is defined as "an economic structure in which productive tools are owned and managed by the workers and used for the collective good" (Brinkerhoff et al., 2007). From the definitions, it is clear that unlike capitalism, socialism favors a situation...

...

In the case of capitalism, no attempt is made to have economic activities controlled from a central point on behalf of the community. Here, enterprises are allowed to compete in the supply of goods and services as they seek to rake in monetary returns. The key driving force of the latter economic system is communal welfare while that of the former is profit. It is also important to note that unlike socialism, capitalism permits (and perhaps encourages) class differences in the society (Furze, Savy, Brym, and Lie, 2012). When it comes to capitalism, class inequalities are seen as the unavoidable consequence of the economic system. Socialism abhors class inequalities and instead seeks to foster equality.
It is important to note that over time, significant criticism has been leveled against both economic systems. To begin with, there are those who are convinced that capitalism is largely exploitative. Adherents of the socialism system argue that in a capitalist system, the need for equality cannot be reconciled with the…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Andresen, M.L. & Taylor, H.F. (2007). Sociology: Understanding a Diverse Society (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomas Higher Education.

Brinkerhoff, D.B., White, L.K., Ortega, S.T. & Weitz, R. (2007). Essentials of Sociology (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomas Higher Education.

Ensign, R.L. & Patsouas, L.M. (Eds.). (1993). Challenging Social Injustice: Essays on Socialism and the Devaluation of the Human Spirit. New York, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.

Furze, B., Savy, P., Brym, R.J. & Lie, J. (Eds.). (2012). Sociology in Today's World (2nd ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.


Cite this Document:

"Capitalism And Socialism The Two Dominant Economic" (2013, April 13) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/capitalism-and-socialism-the-two-dominant-89486

"Capitalism And Socialism The Two Dominant Economic" 13 April 2013. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/capitalism-and-socialism-the-two-dominant-89486>

"Capitalism And Socialism The Two Dominant Economic", 13 April 2013, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/capitalism-and-socialism-the-two-dominant-89486

Related Documents

Capitalism and Socialism Capitalism Socialism Social Institutions The debate over Capitalism and Socialism is one of the most important debates in the modern era. It has caused countless wars and political movements, which still drives political debate today. However, both models arise from common shifts in the our society's dominant social institutions. Thesis: Capitalism was aided by the decline of religious institutions, replacing those institutions with economic institutions. However, economic institutions, though

For example, in the early days of the Russian Revolution there was a very high standard of democracy which those fighting the revolution created. In the early days soviet democracy prevailed, land and factories were turned over to peasant and worker soviets, the debt was canceled, the banks, trusts and cartels were nationalized... [it was] democratic to the core, in which the police and standing army were to be replaced

Mixed Economies Comparing the Dominant Mixed Economy Models Most of the world's economies today operate according to some form of mixed capitalism. The two extremes of the past centuries' world economies (Adam Smith's free-market economy and the Marxist-Leninist communist economy) have exerted enough pressure on the middle to create to some degree a mixed economy in nearly every nation. There are numerous terms for and ways to describe these mixed economies. One

Human Society -- Economic or State Power Background (State Power and Economic Power) -- The political and sociological aspect of power is the ability for an organization to control its own environment, including the behavior of other entities with which it reacts. Authority is seen as the perception of legitimate power by the social structure of dominant culture. Power can be, of course, seen as good or evil, but the

Thus, the ecological teaching of the Bible is of stewardship, so that rather than being "spiritual at the earth's expense [….] it means exactly the opposite: do not desecrate or depreciate these gifts […] by turning them into worldly 'treasure'; do not reduce life to money or to any other mere quantity" (Berry 526). This biblical ecology would seem in direct opposition to the engagement with capitalism Benne and

Sociological Paradigms
PAGES 2 WORDS 506

Sociological Paradigms: Structural Functionalism, Conflict, And Symbolic Interactionism In the field of sociology, there are three paradigms that reflect the ideologies, concepts and ideas prevalently used in sociological studies and research: structural functionalism, social conflict and symbolic interactionism. These paradigms are categorized as such because of their differences; however, they also complement each other because each provides information and explanation about social phenomena in various perspectives. Hence, each paradigm complements the