Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
Critique of Kotter's Eight Stage Model of Change
The development of change models to support the way that management undertakes change may be seen as a useful development; providing a framework from which change may be understood and therefore actively managed. One of the first models of change was proposed by Lewin (1951, p22), which presented a relatively simple format for managing change, made up of three stages; unfreezing, the change and then refreezing. It may be argued that this has formed the basis of many subsequent change models, which is built on this foundation and expanded and extended the concept. For example, the well-known eight stage change model by Kotter (1996, p33) may be seen as readily some inspiration from the simple predecessor from Lewin. Kotter's model, with eight stages, has been argued as being one of the most comprehensive change management models facilitates consideration for many different aspects associated with the change, including the way it is prepared for, the way it takes place and how it is entrenched following the change (By, 2005, p369). When examining Kotter's model, looking at the benefits and the strengths of this model as well as its weaknesses, a good starting point is to examine the individual stages before looking at the model in an holistic manner.
The first stage of Kotter's model is to create a sense of urgency (Kotter, 1996, p35). It is argued that if there is no sense of urgency there will be an absence of motivation which is required for a change to take place. This may be seen as aligned to the first stages of lumens unfreezing, preparing employees for the change (Lewin, 1951, p22). Kotter (1996, p9) notes that employees will often prefer the status quo, even where they are unhappy with this. This approach is supported by other theorists, including Peter Senge, who argues that employees are conditioned to resist change (Senge, 2006, p12). Urgency will need to be created by ensuring that the employees know why the change needs to occur. This understanding is likely to increase employee's facilitation of change, even where it is not welcomed. For example, the unions cooperated with General Motors (GM), when the firm is facing problems needed to reduce the working hours of employees (Newman, 2008, p1). Likewise, the pilots of Delta accepted a deal from the company which included a pay cut, understanding that the company was facing significant financial difficulties (Field, 2004, p13). The ability to create urgency will rely on effective communication from management, and should incorporate an honest and open dialogue (Kotter, 1996, p35). It is only after this date has been completed the next stage may be tackled.
The second stage is the creation of a "powerful guiding coalition" (Kotter, 1996, p51). This looks at the way in which management and leadership need to be seen as supporting the decision, as support for the change is likely to emanate downward. It is notable a number of change models argue for the importance of leadership to guide change and act as a centre of influence (Buchanan and Huczynski, 2010, p22, Dervitsiotis, 1998, p109). This may be seen as leading to the third stage, which Kotter states is the need to create a vision and strategy for the change (Kotter, 1996, p67). This builds on the former stages, and includes determining the goals of the change and the desired outcomes and the way these will be achieved, as well as communicating their vision of that change and the outcomes to the employees (Kotter, 1996, p68). This communication is employees also need to see the leader themselves enthusiastic and committed (Kotter, 1996, p69).
The fourth stage is the communication of vision (Kotter, 1996, p85), which may be undertaken on a 'one to one' or 'one to many' communication strategy. During this stage it is critical that the actions as well as words of management are seen to support the change (Kotter, 1996, p85). This is also supported in almost all other models (Buchanan and Huczynski, 2010, p22; McCallum, 1997, p73). Simonson (2005, p7), notes that way employees do not see leadership as committed and enthusiastic about the vision, leadership is effectively sending a message to the employees that it is not important, a message which undermines the need for change.
The first four stages may be seen as preparation stages, aligned to lumens unfreezing stage, which will help…[continue]
"Change Management Critique Of Kotter's Eight Stage" (2012, April 19) Retrieved October 27, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/change-management-critique-of-kotter-eight-79345
"Change Management Critique Of Kotter's Eight Stage" 19 April 2012. Web.27 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/change-management-critique-of-kotter-eight-79345>
"Change Management Critique Of Kotter's Eight Stage", 19 April 2012, Accessed.27 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/change-management-critique-of-kotter-eight-79345
change management, more than 60% of the efforts for organizational change fail. Organizational changes usually fail because they do not approach it in a holistic manner needed to come up with and achieve change. Research methods for engaging employees in the process of change and for benchmarking the progress of change initiatives include: Establishing a Vision Establishing a mode of making people appreciate the purpose of the change is beneficial in
Kotter's and Lewin's models and discusses their roles as diagnostic tools and as implementation agents. It is the nature of organizations to face constant change, whether the source comes from competitive pressures, new opportunities, technological advances or new initiatives and so forth. Both models offer a methodology for effectively managing change. Kotter's 8-Step Change Model Change management models help organizations to effect change in a systematic manner while avoiding some of
Leading Change There are a number of diverse aspects of John Kotter's seminal treatise on leadership, Leading Change. Subsequently, much of the publicity and academic scholarship involving this work of literature have revolved around the eight stages of creating fundamental, lasting changes within an organization. Although Kotter is significantly (and deservingly) renowned within the business world for the creation and configuration of these steps, it would be misleading to regard Leading
(Again, to refer once again to wartime parallel, one battle victory or capture of an enemy leader increases motivation, but does not justify or provide a vision for winning an entire conflict.) With the value of Kotter's 1996 insights, one can see the folly of simply pleasing immediate investor expectations and seeking a quick fix was the source of the later accounting mismanagement scandals at HeathSouth and Enron, where
The biggest failure of this article is the lack of directness and candor the authors call out CEOs for not having a consistency of vision and direction to support their organizations, and in so doing, create effective incentive and compensation programs. The authors have proposed no metrics despite a wealth of theorems and theoretical constructs, further distancing their analysis from the immediate, pragmatic needs of companies who require a
Spotlighting Samplings 4 Qualitative Research Research Choices 6 the Phenomenology Method The Ethnography Method DEPTH Four Qualitative Approach Comparison Strengths and Critiques of Case Studies "A research design indicates the full research process from conceptualization of the research problem, generation of data, analysis and interpretation of findings, and dissemination of results" (Magilvy & Thomas, 2009, What and Why… Section, ¶ 4). The Question of Interest What type of research design should the researcher use? To answer the study's critical research