Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Contracts
The author of this response is asked to answer to three high-level scenarios, with a few sub-scenarios and questions thrown in. The first one regards a "fine dining" restaurant, the second speaks of distant deal making and the third refers to cover charges and any associated gratuity provisions. These questions will be addressed one at a time.
The first question pertains to a restaurant where the nascent stages of the dinner are started including water, bread/butter and such. However, looking at the menu reveals that the subject cannot afford what is on the menu. The assignment then asks whether the subject has an obligation to pay. The answer would probably be no unless there is a clear and define charge associated with entering the restaurant, taking a sweet or from the water/bread itself. If, instead, something is ordered and no mention...
Short of that, there is likely no financial obligation.
As for the cover charge/gratuity question of whether the charges apply even if the fine print is not seen or read, the charges would generally apply so long as the person is given the menu. The menu, in most ways, is the "contract" and just because a person does not read said fine print does not mean it does not apply. It is akin to people who blindly accept the terms and conditions of a software program. Just because it wasn't read does not mean it wouldn't be enforced should the need arise.
It would be better if the waiter/waitress clearly stated the terms in…
Contracts Scenario On June 15, Peters orally offered to sell a used lawn mower to Mason for $125. Peters specified that Mason had until June 20 to accept the offer. On June 16, Peters received an offer to purchase the lawn mowe for $150 from Bronson, Mason's neighbor. Peters accepted Bronson's offer. On June 17, Mason saw Bronson using the lawn mower and was told the mower had been sold to
Production Case Study PRICE NEGOTIATION MEMORANDUM (The prenegotiation objectives establish the Government's initial negotiation position. They provide parameters that will be used in the contracting officer's final determination of a fair and reasonable price. They should be based on the results of the acquisition team's analysis of the offeror's proposal, taking into consideration all pertinent information including field pricing assistance, audit reports and technical analysis, fact-finding results, independent Government cost estimates, and
Wendy Wanderer Most states have an 'attractive nuisance' clause, which stipulates that homeowners must ensure that their property does not contain 'attractive nuisances' that can encourage children to engage in dangerous behaviors. But an attractive nuisance is usually thought to be a swimming pool that is not fenced in vs. general rubbish. Prior to 2001 Ohio, Vermont, and Maryland were the only states without some version of the "attractive nuisance" doctrine"
Ergonomics Minimum standards for private sector pension plans and health care plans were established under ERISA, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. In addition to the basic provision for pension plans, the Act also requires information sharing and a degree of transparency for participants. For example, ERISA mandates the availability of information regarding plan features, funding, and fiduciary responsibilities as well as offering participants information about legal rights related
Durable Power of Attorney Executed by JOHN STANDRIDGE, Social Security number: 123-45-6789 I JOHN STANDRIDGE, residing at 123 Little Lane in Huntsville, Alabama 35804, hereby designate JANE STANDRIDGE, 123 Little Lane in Huntsville, Alabama 35804,, to serve as my agent/attorney in fact. The following terms and conditions apply until such time that it is revoked by me in writing, and are otherwise irrevocable, even in the event of my death or disability: Authority
Mr. Leiber will be eligible to claim $1,000.00 for each of those pieces as the difference between the contract price and the actual current price is approximately a difference of $1,000.00. If however, that price changes during the course of arbitration the difference in price should be changed in order to reflect that difference. Further according to article 50, should Satel have to ultimately pay for the 30 non-counterfeit