Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Discuss with your peers the issue of whether the protection of the 4th Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures has been seriously eroded by all these exceptions? Explain, in detail, why or why not?
(1) Search Incident to Lawful Arrest permits police to search persons who are lawfully arrested. This is a practical exception that does not seriously erode 4th Amendment protections, mainly because it does not interfere with the rights of citizens unless or until the other constitutional protections against unlawful arrest have been satisfied. In practical terms, lawfully arrested persons cannot be permitted to enter into the custody of the state without first ensuring that they are not in possession of weapons or other contraband.
(2) Search by Consent permits police to conduct searches of persons or property if they first obtain consent from subjects of those searches. Technically, consent obtained must be given freely and voluntarily and when that is the case, there is no violation of constitutional rights. However, in practice (i.e. "in the field"), consent may not always be properly obtained, such as where police ask in intimidating ways or by intimating that there might be negative consequences for refusing consent. In those cases, the particular facts (and not the concept of consent search) may violate the 4th Amendment.
(3) Emergency/Exigent Circumstance/Hot Pursuit is an exception based on the common sense of not requiring police to obtain a search warrant to follow a fleeing suspect into or onto...
Since the police would be entitled to do so, if they happen to notice contraband or witness a crime on those premises, there is no violation of 4th Amendment rights when they seize that contraband or execute a lawful arrest for any crime they observe in the process of their lawful entry. (This exception is closely related to another, the Plain View exception.)
(4) Automobile Exception permits police to conduct searches of vehicles based on probable cause without first using that probable cause to obtain a warrant from a judge of magistrate, as is ordinarily required in other circumstances. Provided that police adhere to the requirements "in the field" pertaining to their initial justification for initiating traffic stops and provided they genuinely have probable cause, this exception makes sense and does not violate 4th Amendment protections because vehicles are so mobile that requiring a search warrant based on probable cause at the scene of traffic stops would be impractical as well as require violating other rights pertaining to the reasonableness of the maximum amount of time that subjects may be detained during traffic stops.
Sources Consulted
Akers, R.L. And Sellers, C.S. (2004). Criminological Theories: Introduction,
Evaluation, and Application. California: Roxbury Publishing Company.
Schmalleger, F. (2009) Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Text for the 21st
Century. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Sources Consulted
Akers, R.L. And Sellers, C.S. (2004). Criminological Theories: Introduction,
Evaluation, and Application. California: Roxbury Publishing Company.
Schmalleger, F. (2009) Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Text for the 21st
Century. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Criminal Procedure Book Review Criminal Justice Criminal John Ferdico's Criminal Procedure for the Criminal Justice Professional The purpose of this work is to thoroughly and comprehensively review the work of John Ferdico entitled "Criminal Procedure for the Criminal Justice Professional. According to Ferdico the law of criminal procedure can be described as "rules designed to balance the important government functions of maintaining law and order and protecting the rights of citizens." Chapter One in
D.). Armed robbery is an offense carried out while in possession of a drawn weapon like gun despite of whether it was fired or not. Plea negotiation or bargaining is usually conducted in order to lessen trial expense and involves the provision of a lesser sentence by the prosecutor in exchange for admission of guilt. Pre-trial conference involves discussions between the defense, prosecutor, and judge to ascertain the need for
The defendant is presented with a written accusation dealing the facts of the crime and his or her involvement in the crime. The written accusation may be presented by a grand jury, a prosecutor or a police officer. If the defendant enters a not guilty plea, a date for trial is set. Bail is either set or the defendant is required to be detained, kept in jail until the
Criminal Justice System: Ethics in Criminal Procedure Ethics refers to the principles of morality that govern an individual's behavior. Ethics, therefore, provides the basis through which an individual defines, and distinguishes between the good and the bad. This implies that it is ethics that provides the framework for the duties and responsibilities an individual owes to himself, and to the community. Today, ethics define how corporations, professionals, and individuals relate with
4. Identify what issues the judge would take into consideration when setting bond for John Judges consider a number of factors as well as issue prior to setting bail. These factors include but they are not limited to the severity of the offense committed, John's ties to the community, his criminal record as well the probability of his absconding. The fact that John does not have any prior arrests could work
These may include dismissals and mistrials, as well as appeals. The chapter details some of the notional elements around double jeopardy, including the situations in which same offense can be defined as such. Essay Gilbert Law Summaries on Criminal Procedure is another excellent book from the Gilbert Law Summaries series. The first thing that needs to be mentioned is that this book comes as close as possible to being an overly