Criminal Justice Process a Felony Term Paper

Download this Term Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Term Paper:

A plea-bargain is frequently attained at this time in order to circumvent a trial. In the event that a plea-bargain is reached, the case does not move forward to a trial but failure to offer enough evidence to establish a plea bargain will mean that the case goes on to trial (Criminal Justice System Handbook, 2009).

The trail

Trials consist of a sequence of proceedings where the prosecutor presents evidence which will be used to prove the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. In felony cases, the defendant is given chances to admit their innocence but there are also times where they are presented that they may dispute the validity of evidence that has been presented by the prosecutor. Felony cases normally entail the services of a jury who listen to the case proceedings together with the judge and then after careful assessment of the evidence that is presented; they make judgment on whether the person accused is guilty of committing the crime or not (Steps in the Criminal Justice Process, n.d.).

The opening remarks which are read at the arraignment are read again before the hearing begins. The presentation of evidence includes such things as direct evidence from key eyewitness as well as evidence that is obtained from the site of crime. This is all presented to the judge and jury. Likewise, circumstantial evidence is presented which connects the defendant to the crime. The constitution affords protection for the accused in the event that the evidence is tampered with by either members of the government or the public. "Any form of contamination of the evidence results in nullifying the evidence such that members who carry out investigations need to be cautious so as not to tamper with any relevant evidence" (Steps in a Trial, 2012).

Additional evidence is then presented by cross and direct examination of witnesses where both sides ask questions to the witnesses which are not leading unless during the cross-examination. The fifth amendment of the United States constitution stops a person from testifying against themselves so they are usually not questioned during the hearing. State law says that after all witnesses have presented their evidence to the court that both sides come together without the jury in order to go over the details of evidence that has been provided. This is all done in the presence of the judge. "If one side is not satisfied with the proceedings, rebuttal of the defense begins where witnesses comment and provide more evidence on the evidence which is presented by the defense. The jury is also given a chance to go over the evidence and at some point the judge gets to hear the verdict of each juror such that they are able to obtain the opinion of each one of them" (Steps in a Trial, 2012).

Sentencing of felony criminals

Sentencing is frequently left to judges who may ask for reports form probation officers. This helps in explaining the behavior and conduct of the accused. Felonies require mandatory sentencing but the judge in charge of the case has the final say in what sentence gets imposed depending on the convicted person's statement during sentencing. Felony cases require a sentence that lasts for at least one year although the judge may seek the alternative of probation depending on past actions of the person. Nonetheless, some sentences also include a fine, probation, a period of incarceration and close supervision for a period of time (Steps in a Trial, 2012).


Appeals are utilized to retry a case on the argument that there were errors in the judgment but it does not apply to instances where the defendant thinks he was unjustly sentenced. These kinds of cases are filed by the individual lawyers but the case is handled by an appellant judge who reassesses the case while no new witnesses or evidence is presented (Criminal Justice Process, n.d.). Appeals by the prosecution after a verdict are not usually permitted for the reason that the U.S. Constitution prohibits a person from being tried twice for the same crime. This is known as double jeopardy. Criminal defendants convicted in state courts have an additional protection in that after they have used all of their rights of appeal at the state level, they may file a writ of habeas corpus in the federal courts in an effort to show that their federal constitutional rights have been violated. "An appeal is not a retrial or a new trial of the case. The appeals courts do not typically consider new witnesses or new evidence. Appeals in criminal cases are typically based on arguments that there were errors in the trial's procedure or errors in the judge's understanding of the law" (Steps in a Trial, 2012).


The criminal justice process of trying a felony is quite complex and it offers very few occasions for a defendant to save themselves from going through the entire process. Even though, at the beginning stages there are quite a number of chances to avoid the harsh sentences that are associated with committing felonies, most state and federal laws call for strict measures in order to decrease the rate of anxiety in society. The multifaceted system therefore, provides a very wide-ranging investigation stage in order to look into the committed crime in order to figure out who did it and punish them appropriately. The entire system allows for many checks and balances in order to make sure that only guilty people are convicted and innocent people are set free.


Criminal Justice. (n.d.). Retrieved from y_legal_guide/chapter_14.authcheckdam.pdf

Criminal Justice System Handbook. (2009). Retrieved from

Criminal Justice Process. (n.d.). Retrieved from

Steps in the Criminal Justice Process. (n.d.). Retreived from

Steps in a Trial. (2012). Retrieved from


The Criminal Justice Process. (2012). Retrieved from


The Process of Criminal Justice. (2012). Retrieved from


Cite This Term Paper:

"Criminal Justice Process A Felony" (2012, June 15) Retrieved October 27, 2016, from

"Criminal Justice Process A Felony" 15 June 2012. Web.27 October. 2016. <>

"Criminal Justice Process A Felony", 15 June 2012, Accessed.27 October. 2016,

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Criminal Justice Process Considerable Attention

    Does the criminal justice system discriminate? Provide support your position with reference to the various components of the process, and give an explanation for either why the system discriminates, or why it appears to discriminate. Yes, the criminal justice system discriminates. African-American males are overrepresented in every part of the criminal process, though there has been no good evidence to show that they actually engage in criminal behavior at rates

  • Criminal Procedure The Criminal Justice

    D.). Armed robbery is an offense carried out while in possession of a drawn weapon like gun despite of whether it was fired or not. Plea negotiation or bargaining is usually conducted in order to lessen trial expense and involves the provision of a lesser sentence by the prosecutor in exchange for admission of guilt. Pre-trial conference involves discussions between the defense, prosecutor, and judge to ascertain the need for

  • Criminal Justice System the American

    Appeals If the defendant is acquitted by the jury or by the judge in a bench trial, the 5th Amendment government prohibits the government from trying the defendant for the same crime. Although there are is no constitutional right to appeal convictions, every state has passed its own laws which allow a convicted defendant to appeal a conviction after trial. The defendant may appeal to an appellate court below the state supreme court

  • Criminal Justice Management and Administration

    Criminal Justice Management and Administration The objective of this work in writing is to describe the historical and theoretical development of organizational management and to list and summarize the most common positions, functions and positions in various Criminal Justice Organizations. The work of Stojkovic, Kalinich, and Klofas (2008) reports that criminal justice administration Management "has come a long way since the President's Commission in 1967 called for a closer look at the

  • Criminal Justice System Normally Refers to the

    Criminal justice system normally refers to the compilation of the prevailing federal; state accompanied by the local public agencies those pacts with the crime problem. These corresponding agencies procedure suspects, defendants accompanied by the convicted offenders and are normally mutually dependent insofar as the prevailing decisions of the single agency influence other supplementary agencies (Cole & Smith, 2009). The fundamental framework of the underlying system is normally granted through the

  • Criminal Justice System Can Be Described as

    Criminal justice system can be described as a collection of state, federal and local agencies which are concerned about problems of crimes. Such agencies assist to process convicted offenders, defendants and suspects. They are also interdependent as the decision from one agency is capable of affecting the other agencies. Their primary framework of their system has been provided by the judicial, legislative and executive branches of government. The Legislature: Both federal

  • Criminal Justice Theory and Policy

    The reduction occurs through allowing the counties to acquire other methods of jailing apart from the prisons. This includes out-of custody rehabilitative treatments, which could serve in reducing the number of the criminals taken to the prisons. However, the AB109 criminals must be individuals whose crime are not violent and not that serious as provided by the law. This means that that jailing of the A109 criminals in other

Read Full Term Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved