Curtiss-Wright Symbolic Communication And Deaf-Blindness: Research Paper

Bennett, K., Griffin, H., Powers, J., Williford, K., Young, C., Jensema, C., Kane, K., & Jones, C. (1995). Delivering effective instruction to students with deaf-blindness and/or other severe disabilities. Raleigh: North Carolina State Department of Public Instruction.

Bixler, E., Calvecchio, S., & Cohan, A. (1997). Enabling and supporting independence through communication. In The individual in a changing society: The proceedings of the National Conference on Deafblindness, June 6-9 (pp. 77-86). Reno, NV: Hilton Perkins Program in cooperation with the Conrad Hilton Foundation.

Bloom, Y. (1990). Object symbols: A communication option. North Rocks, NSW: North Rocks Press.

Bruce, S.M. (2005). The impact of congenital deafblindness on the struggle to symbolism. International Journal of Disability, Development, & Education, 52(3), 233-251.

Bruce, S.M., Mann, A., Jones, C., & Gavin, M. (2007). Gestures expressed by children who are congenitally deaf-blind: Topography, rate, and function. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 101(10), 637-652.

Dalby, D.M., Hirdes, J.P., Stolee, P., Strong, J.G., Poss, J., Tjam, E.Y., Bowman, L., & Ashworth, M. (2009). Characteristics of individuals...

...

Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 2, 93-102.
Goode, D. (1994). A world without words: The social construction of children born deaf and blind. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Miles, B. (1995). Overview on deaf-blindness. D-B-Link. Monmouth, OR: National

Information Clearinghouse on Children Who Are Deaf-Blind.

Munroe, S. (2001). Developing a national volunteer registry of persons with deaf- blindness in Canada: Results from the study, 1999 -- 2001. Port Morien, Nova Scotia: Canadian Deafblind and Rubella Association.

Siegel-Causey, E., & Wetherby, A. (1993) Nonsymbolic communication. In M. Snell

(Ed.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (pp. 290-308). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Stremel-Campbell, K. & Matthews, J. (1988). Development of emergent language. Monmouth, OR: Communication Skills Center for Young Children with Deaf-Blindness Teaching Research Division.

U.S. Department of Education. (1995). To assure the free appropriate public education of all children with disabilities: Seventeenth Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Alvares, R., & Sternberg, L. (1994). Communication and language development. In L.

Sternberg (Ed.), Individuals with profound disabilities (pp. 192-229). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

Bennett, K., Griffin, H., Powers, J., Williford, K., Young, C., Jensema, C., Kane, K., & Jones, C. (1995). Delivering effective instruction to students with deaf-blindness and/or other severe disabilities. Raleigh: North Carolina State Department of Public Instruction.

Bixler, E., Calvecchio, S., & Cohan, A. (1997). Enabling and supporting independence through communication. In The individual in a changing society: The proceedings of the National Conference on Deafblindness, June 6-9 (pp. 77-86). Reno, NV: Hilton Perkins Program in cooperation with the Conrad Hilton Foundation.


Cite this Document:

"Curtiss-Wright Symbolic Communication And Deaf-Blindness " (2011, July 07) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/curtiss-wright-symbolic-communication-and-43145

"Curtiss-Wright Symbolic Communication And Deaf-Blindness " 07 July 2011. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/curtiss-wright-symbolic-communication-and-43145>

"Curtiss-Wright Symbolic Communication And Deaf-Blindness ", 07 July 2011, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/curtiss-wright-symbolic-communication-and-43145

Related Documents

Those that are in favor of closing these schools only consider the costs of operation of the school that is being closed. They do not consider the additional expense to the local school district and community. This was the case as legislators continue to consider legislation disbanding special education facilities to service deaf students in that state (Hopkins, 2007). They are only looking at one side of the budgetary

Is there, after all any comparison between ordinary schools and those meant for the deaf? If, after all, the parent of a deaf child decides to remove the child from a failing school and wants to enroll him in a public school, where, normally, there is no provision for the deaf, then what will be the next step? As far as the question of student assessments is concerned, each school

Deaf Education
PAGES 2 WORDS 789

educating the deaf. It deals primarily with the video "Dreams Spoken Here" and the ability to teach deaf people to communicate orally and therefore learn in a non-segregated environment. Deaf Education Until relatively recently, deaf education occurred in specialized settings designed specifically to meet the needs of deaf children, according to John Luckner. He further adds that many methods were utilized to educate deaf children depending on the needs of the

"Co-enrolled classrooms," they advise, "represent a promising additional possibility for increasing student social access to peers, as well as increasing achievement. A co-enrolled classroom typically consists of an approximately 2:1 ratio of hearing and Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing (DHH) students. A team of two teachers, a general education teacher and a teacher of DHH students, collaborate to provide instruction. In many CE classrooms, the teachers and students frequently use both

Laurent ClercLaurent Clerc was an important figure in the history of Deaf education in America. He was born in 1785 in a small village in France. When he was just a year old, he fell off a chair into the fireplace in the kitchen. He was badly burned on his face and his sense of smell and hearing were totally damaged. The accident left him Deaf (Laurent Clerc Biography).Laurent grew

Deaf Community and Its Need
PAGES 13 WORDS 3490

Equally destructive is the attitude that communicating with the Deaf person may involve more time and effort than one wishes to expend" (Zieziula, 1998, p. 193). Moreover, and perhaps one of the most important challenges related to this issue, a large percentage of deaf individuals do not trust the hearing society. "Historically, the dominant hearing culture has relegated deaf people to social categories such as "handicapped" and "outsider." The history