Disobeying the Law Have Always Term Paper

Download this Term Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Term Paper:

By developing military weapons that can hurt a large percentage of people if deployed, what the country is doing is the exact opposite of what it is required to do. If I am not getting the benefits I expect, this means I can disobey the law if the moral need to do so arises.

Gratitude then becomes a vague term. I am grateful to the state for something such as property on which I live, rights that I have had, access to education and healthcare I have enjoyed. In exchange for these, I am expected to obey the law. Fair enough! But if obedience of law hurts my rights or rights of some other person, should I still follow the law? This is the question that we need to ask ourselves. There is more than one case where we might actually end up hurting the moral rights of someone while obeying the law. For example a sick woman who is in critical condition needs to be taken to the hospital but we realize that the law does not permit breaking the signal in a state of hurry. In case I break the signal to get that woman to the hospital in time without endangering the lives of anyone else, am I committing an offence? Isn't disobedience of law in such cases a more desirable moral solution that obeying the law. Rawls puts it in these words:

shall assume, as requiring no argument, that there is, at least in a society such as ours, a moral obligation to obey the law, although it may, of course, be overridden in certain cases by other more stringent obligations. (Rawls 1964, p. 3)

There are thinkers who claim that obedience of law is directly connected with the concept of fair play. If I follow the law and you benefit, then you must follow the law so I can benefit. Important among these thinkers was Hart who claimed:

when a number of persons con! duct any joint enterprise according to rules and thus restrict their liberty, those who have submitted to these restrictions when required have a right to a similar submission from those who have benefitted by their submission. (Hart 1955, p. 185).

The concept of fair play is undoubtedly interesting but lacks power to influence or convince us of its validity. If the only reason I should follow the law is so others can benefit, can we also argue that I am allowed to disobey the law if I know others would benefit. The exchange of benefits is the key in this argument. So if the means to achieve this end turns out to be different, do they have a solid argument against my actions? As mentioned in the case of signal violation- if I decided not to break the signal even if it results in the death of the sick woman, how is that benefiting the woman? The woman is obviously one of those who expect exchange of benefits then why should I let her die when she is clearly the more deserving person because of her immediate need than all those vague faces out there that are not expecting an immediate return from me.

Disobedience of law is never desirable but there are times when this is the morally correct thing to do since we cannot always buy the claim that the law represent "the moral judgment of the majority and its sense of justice." While most laws are created in strict moral framework, what we fail to understand is the variability of moral situations. There are so many occasions where our moral duty to disobey becomes overwhelming powerful compared to our natural duty to obey the law. These are the situations, which cannot be clearly outlined in the law, but it is important to provide for expectations when the basis of an exceptional action was grounded in morality.

References

Rawls, J., 'Legal obligations and the duty of fair play,' S. Hook ed., Law and Philosophy (New York: N.Y.U. Pr., 1963)

Hart, H. 'Are there any natural rights,' Philosophical Review 64 (1955)

Ross, W. The Right and the Good (Ox! ford:…[continue]

Cite This Term Paper:

"Disobeying The Law Have Always" (2006, October 30) Retrieved December 8, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/disobeying-the-law-have-always-72796

"Disobeying The Law Have Always" 30 October 2006. Web.8 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/disobeying-the-law-have-always-72796>

"Disobeying The Law Have Always", 30 October 2006, Accessed.8 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/disobeying-the-law-have-always-72796

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Enforcement of International Law the

    Because there are costs of transaction during the negation process, the international laws will influence the bargain. In changing the agenda and focus of nations and also other actors in handling conflicts and the transitions that results from the conflicts, international law might have lifted expectations to be so high that. The law has succeeded in situations where moral idealism, economics and politics have failed to provide solutions to the

  • Socrates and the Law

    Socrates In Plato's Crito, Socrates engages the title character in a dialogue about the nature of law, justice, and ethics. Crito wants to break Socrates out from prison, making various arguments in favor of the escape. For one, Crito tells Socrates that it is not ethical to abandon his children if he can help it. Second, Crito repeatedly refers to his own honor and ego, not wanting to be viewed as

  • Functions of the Law Examples

    Facilitating planning and the realization of reasonable expectations Examples of facilitation of planning are often seen on the local level: laws about when individuals can take their trash to the curb, recycling, and acceptable noise limits create a more positive community environments through the setting of reasonable expectations. Without such formal standards, communities would be far more chaotic and setting goals and priorities for the community would prove difficult. Budgeting deadlines set

  • Philosophy Rejecting the Law and

    This means that if someone has a problem with a law, there is an opportunity for that person to take action that can result in the law being changes. This is an opportunity that Socrates had. As noted, he was aware that he was disobeying moral laws. However, he also acted as if the laws did not exist and failed to recognize the reality of them. In doing so,

  • What Makes the Rule of Law Legitimate

    Rule of law Legitimate? 'The Rule of Law is to be Legitimate because the issue of law is not a simple, but a highly complex one, and it involves the analysis of numerous important issues." Law is not as simple as something that can be forced upon or coerced out of an individual or a group because of several reasons. One is that when it is a criminal statute, for

  • Natural Law in Apology Crito Plato Presents

    Natural Law In Apology Crito, Plato presents Socrates a staunch defender law, sense respect legal orders polity a basic obligation citizenship. What important reasons Socrates position defense Athenian law? If accept Lewis' critique emotional subjectivism (Gaius Titus' position) Abolition Man sound, interpret Socrates' actions result subjective feelings. Plato's "Apology" and "Crito" and C.S. Lewis' concept of Natural Law: Where both pagan and Christian philosophies meet in agreement One of the most striking actions in

  • Force in Law Enforcement the

    During the 1960's and 1970's, violent contact with the police, resulting in force occurred during anti-war, labor and civil rights demonstrations, during a politically tumultuous time. It is safe to conclude that excessive force was used during these clashes. Deaths and injuries were the results of political clashes at the Republican Convention in Chicago, during campus riots held at several universities, during political demonstrations held in public places and in


Read Full Term Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved