Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
Erin Brockovich directed by Barry Sorenson. Specifically it will discuss technological systems and ethics throughout the film, and their implications for society. Erin Brockovich is a disturbing drama about ethics and ethical issues in society. It clearly illustrates how these issues can break down society if it allows them to. What is more disturbing is the issues in the film were essentially true and did occur. Ethics in America and American business is still a contentious issue today, and you cannot trust big business to always do what is right for the people, as this film shows. This film ties in closely with the violations so many businesses and business leaders have used in the past to line their own pockets while systematically destroying their companies. These violations were ethically and morally wrong, but greed became more important than common sense and common decency. Ethically, it seems people are easily swayed by money and power, and this is the main cause of ethics violations here and around the world.
Because this even actually occurred in the 1980s, there is surprisingly little technology employed throughout the film. There are cell phones (with no signal), some computers, but most of the lawyers office depends on file clerks such as Brockovich to comb though an excess of records and make sense of them. The technology gets about as advanced as a photocopy machine. PG& E. uses outmoded technology at their plant, too. The holding ponds should have been lined to prevent groundwater contamination, but they were not. Therefore, PG& E. placed people in jeopardy because of old, outmoded technologies. The implications of this lack of technology are quite clear. The people of Hinkley, CA might have gone on dying and never blamed PG& E. However, a humble file clerk just happened to stumble upon evidence and acted on it. This means that sometimes technology is unnecessary and common sense is the most important technology available in certain situations.
This film is literally full of ethical concerns for society and for individuals. The film opens with Brockovich trying desperately to land a job she is not qualified for. She will tell the doctor just about anything if he will give her the job. Her main concern is feeding and housing her children, and she will stop at little to accomplish that. The courtroom scene where the high-paid lawyer defends his doctor client also sets the stage for the ethical violations to come. It does not matter if the low-paid wage earner was in the right; the doctor has enough money to defend himself and his erratic driving. It is a classic case of money beating out ethics, and the same thing would have happened with PG& E. And the people of Hinkley if Brockovich had not dug deeper into the real estate files. The ethics lesson here is that in most societies, those with money hold most of the power. It is rare that the underdog can win out against a massive "$28 billion company" as PG& E. Usually their money and their power can buy them out of most problems before they become public. The ethics of this is simple. The people do not matter to the company. Only their profits and own security matters. It seems like the ethics of post-Katrina New Orleans, when it was dog-eat-dog and every person out for their own survival. If society continues in this vein than it cannot survive, for there is no reward for ethical behavior and there is no trust between any of society's members.
As noted, this film contained a long line of ethical dilemmas and solutions. Brockovich left her children with "the chicken fat lady" because she could not afford alternative health care. Her boss grudgingly gave her a job, but with "no benefits" when he knew she had three children to support. Her boss fired her for not reporting to work without anyone bothering to find out what she was really doing. She relied on a near stranger to take care of her children when "the chicken fat lady" disappeared. This woman dumped off three children with no one to look after them. The list of ethical dilemmas goes on and on. What the film illustrates is that people face thousands of ethical dilemmas every day, and that…[continue]
"Erin Brockovich" (2005, September 22) Retrieved October 28, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/erin-brockovich-67597
"Erin Brockovich" 22 September 2005. Web.28 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/erin-brockovich-67597>
"Erin Brockovich", 22 September 2005, Accessed.28 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/erin-brockovich-67597
Chromium 6 is a Class A carcinogen only in "extremely heavy occupational exposure, as when manufacturing it or using it in welding; the exposure in these cases was through inhalation. That explains why the two cancers connect to Chromium 6 are "parts of the body with which air makes direct contact during inhalation," while it is a Class D (no link) carcinogen for ingestion through the water supply (Fumento,
Unfortunately, as noted by Thomas Dye (2002), the relative power of interest groups in Washington D.C. is not determined by the sheer numbers of the members, but upon the social makeup of the interest group. Interest groups made up of the elite members of society, with the 'right' education and professional connections have more influence with more powerful politicians. One of the most transgressive aspects of Erin's persona is that
Erin Brockovich Did you come away from the movie convinced that the company had done wrong and that Masry and Erin had performed a beneficial service? If so, why did you reach those conclusions? Yes, the company had been involved in wrongdoing and Masry / Erin performed a beneficial service. This is because PG&E was buying up homes that were contaminated (based on their waste management practices). They would then destroy these
She shows why courage is important and how courage can impact a large number of people. In the action/thriller/dark comedy Kill Bill, the protagonist called simply The Bride exhibits courage of a different sort. Although The Bride does demonstrate moral as well as physical courage due to her sense of righteousness regarding her ex-boyfriend, The Bride emerges as a purely physical hero. The Bride undertakes physical challenges that Tarantino portrays
Erin Brokovich Made famous by her eponymous movie, Erin Brockovich is a consumer rights advocate whose work has exposed the weaknesses inherent in organizational behavior. The 2000 film was about Brockovich's fight for social and environmental justice. Pacific Gas & Electric had been blatantly poisoning groundwater with Chromium 6, a toxic agent related to a host of health issues. Brockovich's determination to expose the injustice led to a successful litigation against
Even when citizens ban together to form a lobbying group and the group's influence should theoretically not exceed the numbers of the group's membership, quite often the faction's ability to have influence depends upon the financial and social status of its membership. However, it is not enough to merely blame interest groups. The fact that Erin Brockovich was able to succeed demonstrates that the American political process can work. The
Erin Brockovich & Corporate Ethics Deviant Behavior Eric Brockovich, a film released in 2000, is a dramatization of a true story of a woman who became a legal assistant through the sheer force of her personality -- and after discovering evidence that people were being poisoned by toxins from a Pacific Gas and Electricity (PG&E) plant -- nearly single-handedly -- successfully brings a lawsuit against the company ("IMDB," 2011). The film provides