Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from essay:
There is no question, the dying process is one of consummate emotional and physical loss for the individual dying and the individual(s) who is left to repair the life they have put on hold to lovingly usher their loved one out of this world. The situation is often so extreme that care providers see and do things that in life would have seemed improbable if not impossible and the dying patient can be left feeling debased and completely helpless to do anything about it. For the dying patient not having the ability to spare the care provider from having recurring remembrances of this gory and debasing existence, rather than the remembrances that are reflective of the individuals life can and often is emotionally devastating.
Opponents of the right to die demonstrate an unwavering expression of the need for individuals to have as much time as they can with loved ones to express dying wishes, say goodbye, and follow every coarse of treatment offered by the medical community, so family will be left knowing that everyone did everything they could, an attempt to remove the normal stage of guilt from death and grief.
Woodman 110) This attempt to lesson the blow, no matter how idealistic can end in a painful affirmation of loss that can be carried with the living to their own deaths, rather than avoiding anything they are adding to the burden of loss and in the heroic medical system of today they are usually adding countless wasted dollars to their burden. Opponents would also like to remove responsibility from the physician, as if it is not the work of a physician to make life and death decisions and to help patients do so with dignity.
Woodman 110) They call upon the Hippocratic oath, even though it has so contorted the physicians ability to deal comfortably with the concept of giving up and embracing the inevitable that it has placed an extreme undue burden on the system and the individual.
Palmer 124) Palliative care, is sometimes not even discussed as an option and looked at by the medical community as something to avoid, even though such care, the care supporting comfort after the terminal state is accepted, has been found to be exceedingly helpful to all involved.
Having experienced end of life decision making, within my own family, and as a medical professional the variation is extreme and yet most people will acknowledge that the challenge is formidable. Most, including myself contend that the thing they wish for the most is the ability to actually ask, and get a response, from the individual dying. Euthanasia offers this opportunity as it can be an intervention that occurs prior to the individual being to ill to react or respond to questions. Some would argue that the right to take one's own life is subject to legal and ethical barriers that should never be bridged, and yet every individual will eventually die and in an individualistic society the right to do so as one chooses does not seem that far fetched.
The value of assisted suicide, should be recognized by those who have the power to do so. Reasons for this are many, but the greatest common denominator is that individuals should be allowed to make conscious decisions about the most personal of experiences, death. Death is the end of ones life, and everyone will eventually experience it and yet in the nature of heroic allopathic medicine there is a modern sense of being able to cheat death, to prolong life through technology and knowledge to such a degree that its abilities are highly overvalued and rated. The individual dying patient is simply seeking to manage the closing of their life in a manner that reflects the living of their life, through self-determination and dignity.
Kamisar, Yale. "Physician-Assisted Suicide: The Problems Presented by the Compelling, Heartwrenching Case." Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 88.3 (1998): 1121-1146.
Palmer, Larry I. Endings and Beginnings: Law, Medicine, and Society in Assisted Life and Death. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, 2000.
Salem, Tania. "Physician-Assisted Suicide." The Hastings Center Report 29.3 (1999): 30.
Woodman, Sue. Last Rights…[continue]
"Euthanasia In All Its Forms" (2009, March 19) Retrieved October 22, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/euthanasia-in-all-its-forms-23812
"Euthanasia In All Its Forms" 19 March 2009. Web.22 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/euthanasia-in-all-its-forms-23812>
"Euthanasia In All Its Forms", 19 March 2009, Accessed.22 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/euthanasia-in-all-its-forms-23812
" This action according to Humphrey allows personal responsibility for family decision making to be broadened to a reasonable level. Humphrey also lays strong claims for the medical responsibilities of euthanasia because of the overemphasis on life-support to prolong human suffering rather than allow certain and peaceful death. Humphrey's believes that the medical community needs be an example to individuals by stopping making decisions for the family based on technological progress
He argues that if society were to allow the terminally ill to commit suicide, then it would be a small step to allow other members of society -- like the handicapped -- to do so as well. This is not a completely trivial argument for two reasons: first, it is the point-of-view held by the majority of the Christian right -- a powerful political force in the Untied States;
If a person is incapacitated, the family should be allowed to make whatever decision they feel will cause the least harm. All such decisions should be underlined with full consultation with legal and medical professionals. I believe the best solution is therefore to firstly adhere to the four principles mentioned above. These principles should be underlined by legislation, and include ethically challenging issues such as euthanasia. To prevent indiscretionary approaches
Euthanasia Is Illegal Euthanasia otherwise known as assisted suicide refers to the painless extermination of a patient suffering from terminal illnesses or painful or incurable disease. According to Cavan & Dolan, euthanasia is the practice or act of permitting the death of hopelessly injured or sick individuals in a painless means for the purpose of mercy (Cavan & Dolan 12). The techniques used in euthanasia induce numerous artifacts such as
euthanasia, including whether to legalize it or not. Today, euthanasia is one of the most controversial and emotional issues in the medical field because of arguments for and against the practice. It is the practice of ending a life in order for terminal patients to escape incurable diseases and intolerable suffering. Doctors have saved the lives of many patients with the latest discoveries in medical care; however, they are
Euthanasia (active and Passive) A Moral Philosophy Paper Euthanasia is the practice of ending a person's life for the sole purpose of relieving the person's body from excruciating pain and suffering due to an incurable disease. The term euthanasia is often referred as mercy killing or the 'good death' as derived from the Greek. Euthanasia can be classified into four categories. In active euthanasia, a person's life is terminated by a doctor
Euthanasia is a Moral, Ethical, and Proper Social Policy When it is carried out with a competent physician in attendance and appropriate family members understand the decision and the desire of the ill person -- or there has been a written request by the infirmed person that a doctor-assisted death is what she or he desired -- euthanasia is a moral, ethical and proper policy. It offers a merciful end to