Exclusionary Rule in Defense of essay

Download this essay in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from essay:

For example, one provision of the Patriot Act "permitted law enforcement to obtain access to tapping stored voicemails by obtaining a basic search warrant rather than a surveillance warrant," even though "obtaining the former requires a much lower evidentiary showing" and wiretapping more accurately seems to mirror surveillance technology, rather than single-incident searches of the premises for specific items (Fourth amendment, 2009, Wex Law). Another provision of the Patriot Act allowed law enforcement to use sneak-and-peak warrants, which meant that they could "delay notifying the property owner about the warrant's issuance" although this was struck down as unconstitutional (Fourth amendment, 2009, Wex Law).

The Patriot Act itself for many Americans highlighted the fragility of American's rights during times of national fear. It also showed the importance of the exclusionary rule, given how even well-intentioned zeal can result in innocent Americans having their privacy being violated by law-enforcement personnel. As surveillance technology grows increasingly sophisticated, the need for the exclusionary rule has grown. Furthermore, the myriad of exceptions for the exclusionary rule highlight the fallacy that the rule frequently results in individuals being let go simply on legal technicalities. In the real world, protecting American's rights is more of a challenge than trying to prevent an entire case dissolving because of a small legal snafu regarding the exclusionary rule.

Works Cited

Blackstone. (2009). Legal Dictionary. Retrieved May 5, 2009 at http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Blackstone,+Sir+William

Evaluation of the exclusionary rule. (2009). essortment. Retrieved May 5, 2009 at http://www.essortment.com/all/exclusionaryrul_rmlx.htm/

Fourth amendment. (2009). Wex Law. Cornell University. Retrieved May 5, 2009 at http://topics.law.cornell.edu/wex/fourth_amendment

Fruit of the poisonous tree. (2009). Law Encyclopedia. Retrieved May 5, 2009 at http://law.jrank.org/pages/7042/Fruit-Poisonous-Tree.html

Lynch, Timothy. (1998). "In defense of the exclusionary rule."

Cato Policy Analysis: 319. Retrieved May 5, 2009 at http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-319es.html

The U.S. Constitution. (2009). Retrieved May 5, 2009 at http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.table.html#amendments[continue]

Cite This Essay:

"Exclusionary Rule In Defense Of" (2009, May 05) Retrieved December 9, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/exclusionary-rule-in-defense-of-22160

"Exclusionary Rule In Defense Of" 05 May 2009. Web.9 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/exclusionary-rule-in-defense-of-22160>

"Exclusionary Rule In Defense Of", 05 May 2009, Accessed.9 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/exclusionary-rule-in-defense-of-22160

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Exclusionary Rule Within the Scope

    The U.S., however, is the only industrial democracy, common law or otherwise, in which courts must throw out tainted evidence in criminal trials. The U.S. Supreme Court decisions establishing and expanding on this principle have collectively come to be known as the "exclusionary rule." Although the rule had its origins in arguments about the morality of obtaining a conviction while relying on improperly obtained evidence, its primary modern justification

  • Exclusionary Rule Has Become a

    The Court cited language from Boyd in support of its proposition. The Boyd Court had held that the Fourth and Fifth Amendments "apply to all invasions on the part of the government and its employees of the sanctity of a man's home and the privacies of life. It is not the breaking of his doors, and the rummaging of his drawers, that constitutes the essence of the offence; but

  • Import of the Exclusionary Rule

    The nature of the crime the defendant is accused of will also determine the amount of bail. A relatively minor offense will garner a lower sum of money than a serious crime like murder. Q4. State and explain the two (2) types of immunity that might be offered to an individual when that individual is compelled to testify before a Grand Jury. Two types of immunity that exist are use and

  • Criminal Defense Homicide Case

    Criminal Defense Homicide Case Fourth Amendment Searches and Seizures in Contemporary America The conviction of a client charged with murder is threatened by evidence the prosecution holds. There are indications that this evidence was obtained unconstitutionally. Presumably, the exclusionary rule would be the primary vehicle for moving to have this evidence excluded. If the search and seizure was conducted without a warrant and not incident to an arrest, vehicle stop, or hot

  • Federal Rules of Evidence the

    Rule: Any out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted is generally inadmissible as hearsay. (801-802) However, hearsay may be admitted, in a prosecution for homicide or in a civil case, if the declarant, while believing the declarant's death to be imminent, made the statement about its cause or circumstances. (804(b)(2). Application: Here, the defense attorney's objection is premised on the fact that the deceased Sam's statements are

  • Criminal Procedure

    Constitutional Violations Two types of remedies that protect citizens against governmental wrong doing and ensure the projections of the Constitution are the Exclusionary Rule and Defense against Entrapment. The Exclusionary Rule means that any evidence that is illegally obtained (without probable cause, etc.) must not be used when prosecuting defendant. The idea is that any issue, statement or evidence illegally obtained is "fruit of the poisoned" tree and denies Constitutional protections.

  • Troy Stone Is Showing How the Police

    Troy Stone is showing how the police engaged in questionable tactics. This is based upon the fact that they have a witness who identified him. Yet, they were not able to come up with any corroborating evidence to directly link him to the murder. To make matters worse, they violated his constitutional rights in the process. These issues are highlighting how there were questionable tactics used to obtain the

Read Full Essay
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved