Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … tagged along with the burning issue of slavery in those years preceding the American Civil War, expanding American territory would redound to the best advantage of its people and further enhance its economic and political objectives and gains.
The principle of manifest destiny could be invoked, whereby the people of those days had the power and duty "to overspread and to possess the whole of (the Northern American) continent, which Providence has given (them) for the development of the great experiment of liberty." This tenet, introduced and made popular by journalist John L. Sullivan in 1845, which maintained that it was the American nation's destiny as well as duty to conquer the West and to expand its limits "in the name of God, nature, civilization and progress." Reminding both Northerners and Southerners, whether pro-or anti-slavery, about this divine right and supreme responsibility could incline their minds to the necessity of expanding American territory in those days. Both factions must be helped into viewing this destiny as benevolent and dignifying as well as magnanimous to these territories to be won.
In the process of expanding territorial jurisdiction, new acquisitions should be strictly categorized and examined, whether as a free state or a slave state, as in the case of Texas. There should be a new set of rules to govern territories considered slave states, while free states should be immediately incorporated into the Union with full rights, responsibilities and privileges.
Maintain the "common-property doctrine" whereby these newly acquired free state-territories, won by wars or by any other means, should become the common property of all states, and not the property of the federal government. This would mean that the federal government would not interfere with the right of private citizens of any such free states from emigrating with their 'slaves" or property.
Revitalize the policy of popular sovereignty associated with then Northern Democrats headed by then Senator Stephen Douglas in pushing for the passage of the Nebraska Act of 1854 which, in turn, repealed the Missouri...
Move that the people of a territory or state should have the autonomy to tackle the slavery issue for itself without interference from the government. Whatever the differences and gaps between the Northerners' and Southerners' concepts of popular sovereignty should be bridged, not by compromise, but a majority vote.
If this argument were raised before the 19th century, the 1789 Constitution should be invoked, particularly Sections 9 to 10 of Article 1, which prohibited Congress from interfering with the slave trade prior to 1808 and which taxed each slave at a maximum of $10 each. Expansion at that time was greatly encouraged and the slave trade was controlled only by taxes.
There would be no compromises, as compromises had proved to breed greater strain and more conflicts.
If this argument were presented after 1808, an amendment to this section of the Constitution could be sought to encourage expansion, but move for the importation and emigration of slaves for a limited period, states or territories, volume and at a higher tax. There would be an entirely different set of laws for Black states and territories which would encumber so as to restrain them from rebellion and other acts inimical to the Union.
Pursuant to popular sovereignty, the doctrine of states' rights should be stressed, whereby those states, which desired to welcome expansion and slavery and the federal government should acknowledge their inherent rights to do so without interference. It could furthermore be argued that expansion would be healthy to the Union, whether in the North or South. Increased boundaries in the South would mean a stronger agricultural economy, as 66% of the union's income came from the South.
Take the Compromise of 1850 by Henry Clay as a rallying point. This nullified the Missouri
Compromise and moved actions and decisions on slavery to each state. Remind the audience of the violence that broke out as a consequence of the failed Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854.
Or use the Dred Scott Court decision, which affirmed the rights of white owners of slaves to…
Andrew Jackson's Presidency: A View to Defining the Good and Bad Andrew Jackson is lauded by many as one of the greatest generals and presidents in United States history, and is vilified as one of the most damaging of all time. The fact is that he had some incredible successes in his career that were accompanied by dramatic failures, at least in the minds of some. Jackson himself had so much
This system is stated to be flawed as "The school board members have a vested interest in the success of the existing local school system and are reluctant to introduce a competitor into the marketplace, said charter school supporters." (O'Donoghue, 2010) Summary and Conclusion It is very likely that laws will be changed and policy reformed relating to charter schools in the state of Virginia as to do otherwise means to
African-Americans and Western Expansion Prior to the 1960s and 1970s, very little was written about black participation in Western expansion from the colonial period to the 19th Century, much less about black and Native American cooperation against slavery. This history was not so much forbidden or censored as never written at all, or simply ignored when it was written. In reality, blacks participated in all facets of Western expansion, from the
So who is an American and what an America can or cannot do are questions which are critical to the issue of legalizing immigrants. Does being an American mean you cannot show allegiance to any other country? The images of people raising and waving Mexican flag had enraged many but it need not have. It should be accepted that people who come from different countries would forever hold in their
Nixon before the presidency Military Congress & Senate seat Vice Presidency The election 1972 election and illegal activity Pardon and Conclusion Richard Nixon holds the distinction of being the only United States president to resign the office. Had he not done so, in all likelihood he would have been impeached and forced out of the White House. While in office President Nixon performed a myriad of activities which were at the very least immoral, but often
In 1837, Lincoln took highly controversial position that foreshadowed his future political path. He joined with five other legislators out of eighty-three to oppose a resolution condemning abolitionists. In 1838, he responded to the death of the Illinois abolitionist and newspaper editor, Elijah Parish Lovejoy, who was killed while defending his printing presses from a mob of pro-slavery citizens in Alton, Illinois. In a statesmanlike manner, Lincoln gave a cautious