Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Free Will and Determinism
What is free will, according to philosophic interpretations? What is determinism -- and how is it different from free will? What do philosophers say about free will and determinism? These questions will be answered in this paper, along with issues that dovetail and provide additional clarification and understanding.
Trinity University's C. Mackenzie Brown, professor of religion, explains one definition: an action is "free" if and only if it's cause is internal to the agent, not external. But, Brown argues, a sneeze has an internal cause, but it's not a free action. So perhaps an action is free only it if is caused by the agent's beliefs and desires" (Brown, 2001). As for determinism: "everything has a sufficient cause," he succinctly states; and a "sufficient cause" is one which is sufficient to ensure that the event in question will indeed take place.
Jean Paul Sartre believed that there is "an internal relation existing between what is free and what is transcended by freedom and is not free" (Cox, 2006, p. 64). His quote here requires some deep thought: "Human reality is a perpetual surpassing towards a coincidence with itself which is never given" (Cox, 64). What does that mean? His reasoning is based on his belief that to be free will, it has to be "for-itself" and not "in-itself"; that is, each person's free will is part of a person being "towards the future," Cox explains. "Man is, before all else, something which propels itself towards a future and is aware that it is doing so" (Existentialism and Humanism, Sartre, p. 28) (quoted by Cox, 64). According to Matthew Eshleman's essay, Sartre believed because freedom has such an "unlimited nature" it is impossible to "judge individual agents or groups to be more or less free than any other (Eshleman, 2010, p. 43). So if it's impossible to know...
Later in his work Sartre abandoned "all claims to the unlimited nature of freedom," Eshleman writes. Clearly, confusion can arise when trying to decipher Sartre's views.
Walter Terence Stace makes an argument that free will and determinism are "compatible positions," according to Dr. Ned Beach, philosophy instructor at the University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire. Stace believes free will "in a weak sense" is consistent with determinism. What is a "weak sense"? Beach references Stace's example: if Gandhi went on a hunger strike for ethical reasons, the typical way to describe it is that he did that of free will (using the weak sense of "freedom"). At the same time, Stace would probably admit that Gandhi's act was not really "free" in the "strong sense" because there were internal causes to the strike (Gandhi's "…habits, tendencies…" and political motivations) (Beach, 2007, pp. 2-3). In his book Religion and the Modern Mind, Stace writes:
"…If there is no free will there can be no morality. Morality is concerned with what men ought and ought not to do" (Stace, 1980, 413). As to determinism, he writes, "If human actions and volitions were uncaused, it would be useless either to punish or reward… for nothing that you could do would in any way influence them. Thus moral responsibility would entirely disappear… [and] if there were no determinism of human beings at all, their actions would be completely unpredictable and capricious, and therefore irresponsible" (Stace, p. 418).
Richard Taylor doesn't accept "compatibilism" (that free will and determinism are…
Works Cited
Beach, Ned. Walter Terence Stace "The Problem of Free Will" / Richard Taylor "Freedom
and Determinism." University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire. Retrieved June 20, 2011, from http://www.uwec.edu/beachea/philstudy2answers.htm.
Brown, C. Mackenzie. "Free Will and Determinism." Trinity University Department of Religion.
Retrieved June 20, 2011, from http://www.trinity.edu/cbrown/intro/free_will.html. 2001.
2011, from http://www.suite101.com/content/plato-on-freedom-platonic-philosophy-and-free-will
Hospers, John. "The Meanings of Freedom." Retrieved June 20, 2011, from http://johnhospers.com/Articles/TheMeaningsofFreedom.pdf.
Zombie Argument v. Physicalism: In the field of philosophy, zombies are imaginary creatures that are used to illuminate problems regarding consciousness and its relation to the physical world. As compared to those in witchcraft or films, zombies are exactly like human beings in every physical aspect but without conscious experiences. However, zombies behave like humans and some of them even spend considerable amount of time discussing consciousness. While few people believe
Zombies The possibility of a zombie apocalypse or outbreak has been especially popular recently, in both popular culture and more serious fields. This is because while the actual threat posed by zombies in film and television is not real, in many important ways a potential zombie outbreak mimics the kind of pandemics and disasters that public health officials seek to prevent and plan for. In fact, zombies serve as a such
Zombies in the Haiti Culture In the last two decades, zombies have gained popularity in the Western world, becoming a metaphor for persons who lack consciousness and threaten social structures. Many other parts of the world have accepted this kind of thinking. There are, however, a few differences with regards to the treatment of the figure -- in terms of zombification and the wider inferences to bias inherent in the practice.
One of the reasons that zombie films have endured for as long as they have is because they help people to get a glimpse of what the future may possibly hold. By obtaining such insight into a possible future, people are able to better prepare for it and to not fear it as much as they might without such movies. One of the implications of the zombie meme's tendency to
Consumerism Zombies Culture of Consumerism Much of the Western World has been transformed into a Cult of Consumerism and grounded in Fashionable Consumption. As the Limitations of the Natural World become more clear, something must be done to Challenge Consumerism It can be hard to pinpoint a definition for consumerism. However, generally the term is used to describe people that conflate wants and needs. For example, some people might identify the new iPhone
Zombie Management Add on Richard Richard, I appreciate your comments and strongly resonate with your ideas about the individual and his responsibility to save himself. I think others need to adopt the approach the we have taken on this idea and derive a new idea of the word community. To me community is should be more liberal and voluntary that what is presented in today's culture. This is unfortunate but allows