Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
His byword was "force and prudence," and he believed that demonstrating a combination of these two things is the mark of an effective leader. Kotter may agree that prudence is a valuable characteristic in a leader, but disagrees with the outdated principle of force, saying that change cannot be forced, it must be incorporated into one's life and future:
Change sticks only when it becomes "the way we do things around here," when it seeps into the very bloodstream of the work unit or corporate body. Until new behaviors are rooted in social norms and shared values, they are always subject to degradation as soon as the pressures associated with a change effort are removed (Kotter, 1996, 14). Although he is forward thinking and utilizes the principles of Rousseau's "natural man" in that democratic principles are useful at work and the employee is not to be seen as an underling, Kotter does not go far enough in explaining the bases of his belief system. It is true that Kotter bases his books on his personal experiences in the field and utilizes actual research on his theories. Some believe that he is a great thinker, but while his books evolve into ever more democratic principles, they are simply summarizing concepts which have been adapted from past theorists and have been in place in the organizational marketplace for centuries. True, there are corporations which are run by dictators and there are corporations which are micromanaged, that is easy to see. Perhaps it is time for someone like Kotter to step forward and state the obvious, that neither of these is desirable and in the end they are self-defeating, that a power which comes from the diverse and interdependent body is most successful.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau was an influential philosopher, artist and thinker during the 1700s, and was influential in creating a new way to formulate political bodies. He discussed the inherent goodness of humanity in his Discourse on Inequality, in which he says "natural" or "savage man" is able to refuse to be an animal, to perfect him or herself and improve his/her situation physically and environmentally. He saw civil society as being evil, with its competitiveness, vanity, hatred and power-seeking. But compassion and drive for perfection leads mankind to improve its condition. He believes that one's ability to think of him or herself as free and to make choices raises mankind above the animal kingdom. This discussion of the theories floating about in the 17th Century espoused by Hobbes and Locke, helped the populace to think of themselves as more than lower class laboring masses and to strive for mastery of their fates in forming democracy and overcoming monarchs.
Kotter's ideas are thus compared to the Confucian, Machiavellian and "natural man" theories which have preceded it and it is obvious that he has learned something from each of these.
Works Cited
Kotter, John. Biography. Harvard Business School, 2007. Website: http://drfd.hbs.edu/fit/public/facultyInfo.do?facInfo=bio&facEmId=jkotter&loc=extn.
Kotter, John. Leading Change. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press, 1996.
Kotter, John. Power and Influence. New York: Simon & Schuster Free Press.1985.
Works Cited
Kotter, John. Biography. Harvard Business School, 2007. Website: http://drfd.hbs.edu/fit/public/facultyInfo.do?facInfo=bio&facEmId=jkotter&loc=extn.
Kotter, John. Leading Change. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press, 1996.
Kotter, John. Power and Influence. New York: Simon & Schuster Free Press.1985.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau Section From Confessions The primary confession that Jean Jacques Rousseau makes in this excerpt from his work of literature entitled Confessions is the fact that he was inadvertently responsible for the death of his mother. Evidently, his mother died during or shortly thereafter giving birth to him, because the author writes, "I was born, a poor and sickly child, and cost my mother her life. So my birth was
Jean-Jacques Rousseau Personal Background Jean-Jacques Rousseau was born on June 28th 1712, in Geneva, a French-speaking city-state within Switzerland. He received little formal education and, in 1728, left Geneva to live an unsettled existence, travelling throughout Europe. Although mainly self-taught, Rousseau became a respected novelist, composer, musicologist, and botanist, in addition to his most commonly recognized contribution, as a moral, political and educational philosopher. He first came to prominence as a writer
" Rousseau on Political Representation, Democracy, Law, and the Need for Legislators: In Book II, Chapter 3, Rousseau expresses the position that a representative form of democratic government undermines a true democracy where each individual maintains his own point-of-view without aligning himself with any sub-group or political party, because: when factions arise, and partial associations are formed at the expense of the great association, the will of each of these associations becomes general
Jean-Jacques Rousseau is one of the European theorists who has been cited as an inspiration for the Founding Fathers as they wrote the U.S. Constitution and created the American form of government. In some ways, however, they were using what Rousseau wrote as a beginning point and then finding a governmental form to refute some of Rousseau's concerns for what representative government might become if not controlled. The authors of
Martin Luther King can also allude to Rousseau in the formation of the concept of civil disobedience. As Scott notes, "Rousseau argues that civil society is based on a contractual arrangement of rights and duties which applies equally to all people, whereby natural liberty is exchanged for civil liberty, and whereby natural rights are exchanged for legal rights." Legal rights are a natural extension of natural human rights. If
For Smith, however, the development of a commercial and economic society leads to the existence of a social structure. This social structure is furthermore divided into three classes - the landowners, the capitalists and the laborers. This is considered by Smith to be the three great constituent that exist in every single civilized society. For him, the introduction of social structures like government and economic classes are the major causes