Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Research Paper:
Models of leadership and management
Comparison and contrast of leadership models
Application of leadership model: Case of Mark Zuckerberg
Table 1- Leadership Table
Leadership in public and private sector businesses is important for the growth of these businesses. Of late, many researchers have thoroughly investigated the role leadership in promoting businesses. Researchers have also tried to explore the common characteristics of global business leaders that have led their businesses to successful heights. Different models of effective leadership in corporations have also been drafted. One major aspect of leaders being explored in their ability to inspire people surrounding them and use this inspiration to achieve results that could be achieved without having complete trust of followers. While followers might be hard to make for a leader, and yet harder to retain, few researchers have put forth consolidated models of inspirational leaders that effectively make and retain followers. Two such models that will be used to describe the leadership qualities and relevant model of leadership are those presented by Goffee and Jones (2001). The other leadership model was presented by Drucker (2004). Both these models aim at [resenting some common attributes and modus-operandi of successful inspirational leaders that displayed exceptional skills and ability to make followers in their respective professional field.
In this paper, two models of leadership will be discussed, those presented by Drucker (2004) and Goffee & Jones (2001). The main elements of these models will be discussed in section II of this paper, followed by enlisting comparison and contrasts elements of both these models of leadership. Section III of this paper will apply these models to one of the internationally recognized business leader from the U.S. Mark Zuckerberg has been selected as the leader whose style of leadership will be discussed in light of the two leadership models being discussed earlier. Section IV will include a table that outlines the main differences in leadership style based on aforementioned models. The table will also include leadership qualities of Zuckerberg and their coherence with leadership models discussed earlier. After going through these details, the paper will include a concluding statement as well.
II- Models of leadership and management
In addition to traditionally quoted leadership qualities of energy, authority, and strategic direction, Goffee & Jones (2001) have identified four additional qualities of being an inspirational leader. These four qualities have been summed up as follows.
Revealing weakness: Goffee and Jones have observed that an inspirational leader is one who is able to share or reveal any of his/her weakness. This is said to promote human side of leadership and management function. The leader by admitting that he/she is weak in an area admits in front of followers that he/she is also a human. This provides a reason for the followers to connect to the leader. Nonetheless, the authors do not fail in noting that weakness being revealed by the leader should be a non-essential one, otherwise the leader may appear unprofessional. In the words of researchers, "don't expose a weakness that others see as fatal." [footnoteRef:2] Becoming sensor: The researchers argued that developing a sense of reading subtle cues and information not directed towards the leader is also an essential quality that inspirational leaders need to have. Thus, an inspirational leader should be good at making educated guesses. Tough empathy is also one quality that inspirational leaders have in common. This implies that leaders should have the quality of providing growth opportunities to their followers. "Real leaders empathize fiercely with their followers and care intensely about their people's work." [footnoteRef:3] Being different A leader should capitalize upon what is different and unique in him/her. This allows the followers to get inspired from the leader in developing a bond. This quality also sets the leader apart from the crowd. Goffee and Jones (2001) based their inspirational leadership model on these qualities i.e. sharing weakness with followers, becoming good at sensing things, displaying concern about employees through tough empathy, and remaining somewhat unique as compared to others. [2: Goffee & Jones (2001). Why Should Anyone Be Led by You? IEEE Engineering Management Review. ] [3: Ibid. P-1. ]
Peter F. Drucker in his article "What Makes an Effective Executive" sets out eight simple rules that effective leaders follow in addition to traditionally acknowledge leadership qualities of being strategic thinker and visionary. 1- Ask what needs to be done? This implies that a true leader is only concerned with important things while disregarding those that are unimportant for the organizational to do. The example of Jack Welsh as CEO of General Electric (GE) is cited to substantiate that as Jack closed down all businesses of GE that did not have the potential of becoming number one or two. [footnoteRef:4] Thus, a leader focuses efforts on what could make it number one on respective profession. Second rule for a leader is to ask what is right for the enterprise. Thus, rather than focusing on one stakeholder of enterprise, that may be the owners or employees, the leader does what is best for the whole organization progress and survival. Converting knowledge into action plans is also one of the most distinguishing rules that effective executives follow. This implies that effective leader is action oriented utilizing the knowledge he/she has. Owning responsibility through fixing accountability is also another rule that effective leaders follow. Communication is one action that leaders take effectively. From goal setting to need assessment, executives take responsibility of communicating with others. Opportunities hunting are more attractive to leaders rather than problem solving. The meetings held by effective leaders are only productive meetings having clear goals. And lastly, effective leaders are those who believe in teamwork rather than individuals. We not I is the main rule that drive efforts of leaders as they prioritize group over individual need. [4: Drucker, P.F. (2004). What makes an effective executive? Harvard Business Review. P-15. ]
Comparison and contrast of leadership models
Goffee and Jones (2001) have adopted a more 'tacit' and 'informal' method to highlight the basic qualities of an inspirational leader. Their emphasis is more on charisma and charm of a leader than the actual results that the leader is expected to deliver. This does not imply that charismatic and inspirational leaders, as proposed by Goffee and Jones (2001) are not good at delivering results but it is that the main emphasis of these leaders is in empowering others. The qualities set out by the authors are also more intangible than tangible. For instance, sharing weaknesses and being sensitive to surrounding information is an informal and intangible quality that an inspirational leader possesses. On the other hand, Drucker (2004) presented a model of 'effective leadership' rather than one that also generates thousands of followers. The eight rules that Drucker presented are more tangible and objective in nature as compared to the ones presented by Goffee and Jones (2001).
III- Application of leadership model: Case of Mark Zuckerberg
It seems that each business leader fits into more than one leadership model. Mark Zuckerberg is one of the most successful business leaders that recent history has produced. He is the co-chairman, founder, and CEO of Facebook at age 29 and ranks 36 in Forbes 400 billionaires list with an estimated worth of $13.3 B. [footnoteRef:5] Mark Zuckerberg was deeper and systematic in admitting his weakness and that was regarding the management experience. Zuckerberg acknowledged this weakness by bringing in Sheryl Sandberg as Chief Operating Officer (COO) of Facebook. [footnoteRef:6] By bringing in Sheryl in Facebook, Zuckerberg also displayed the second quality observed by Goffee & Jones and that was sensing. Mark Zuckerberg sensed well that if Facebook needs to resist the hostile bidding of companies such as Yahoo [footnoteRef:7] and others and also bring strategic direction, it will have to rely on industry experts. Following is a table drafted by placing leadership factors presented by Drucker (2004) as well as Goffee and Jones (2001). Mark Zuckerberg also displayed the fourth element called 'being different' of Goffee-Jones model. By dropping out of Harvard Graduation as a junior, [footnoteRef:8] Zuckerberg was able to develop the 'face-mash' idea into Face-book. It was plainly being 'different' from rest of the college graduates and trying his luck with entrepreneurship. The first rule of Drucker model (Ask what needs to be done) was followed by Zuckerberg when he decided to bring in a senior management expert in form of Sheryl Sandberg. Since he knew that all cannot be accomplished by Zuckerberg alone, a seasoned management expert was brought into the company. The knowledge base of Zuckerberg was converted into action plans since the start. Zuckerberg firstly launched 'facemash' as a test website and after the success developed codes for 'Face-book'. This implies he has been an avid action oriented leader. He has also set up an exceptionally empowered team at Face-book; this represents his leadership style of developing people, being tough empathic regarding employees, [5: Forbes. (2013). The World's Billionaires: Mark Zuckerberg. . ] [6: Brio, M.M. (2013). Think like Zuck: How…[continue]
"Leadership Research Models Of Leadership And Management" (2013, July 12) Retrieved October 23, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/leadership-research-models-of-97870
"Leadership Research Models Of Leadership And Management" 12 July 2013. Web.23 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/leadership-research-models-of-97870>
"Leadership Research Models Of Leadership And Management", 12 July 2013, Accessed.23 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/leadership-research-models-of-97870
Leadership, according to La Monica (1938), is when a person has authority that is recognized by others, and the person has followers/subordinates under them, who believe that the person will assist them in attaining certain goals (carrying out specific objectives for the followers). Furthermore, anyone that is willing to assist and help others could be referred to as a leader (p.8) Leaders see what others do not Most leaders have
Leadership is an essential element of management within an organization because of the ability of the element to address the needs and preferences of the shareholders and stakeholders within the context of the market of operation. Leadership depends on effective and efficient communication elements and mechanisms thus the need by the management to address the issues relating to the concept within any organization. My workplace faces diverse management issues in
Leadership Priorities and Practice in Organizational Management The enterprise software industry is going through a series of disruptive innovations that are disrupting the economics of the industry while also shifting the balance of power away from the Chief Information Officer (CIO) to the line-of-business leaders including the Vice Presidents, General Managers and Directors of Business Units. As this balance of power shifts throughout enterprise software, many long-standing approaches to developing, delivering,
However, the sum total of the organization's output extends beyond the realm of the quantifiable. Qualitative measures also exist, and they can impact on the quality of the organization's output as well. It can be argued that even qualitative outputs will eventually impact on quantitative outputs. Ford's loss of reputation as the result of the Pinto scandal, for example, cannot be quantified but the sales and profit decreases that
Evidence-Based Practice & Transformational Leadership Change Model Transformational leadership may be defined as an innovation as it is not in wide or general practice across the medical and healthcare fields. An innovation must, by definition be characterized by benefits that are accrued only through adoption of the innovation into practice or general use. Transformational leadership has been shown to have benefits for patients and patient care, as well as for those practice
Leadership Self-Analysis Amber Leadership has been one of the most studied, researched and theorize topic which has been evaluated, discussed and described by many theorists and scholars. Whereas the truth is that it's no theoretical phenomenon or rocket science. We all act as leader in different situations. Also, we all have different leadership styles and tactics of handling situations. Furthermore, as a leader, we are required to show different leadership skills as
Leadership in Organizations Transformational Leadership in the 21st Century It is often said a manager is what one does, and a leader is who one is. Leadership theorists, experts and practitioners agree that leadership, especially the turbulent 21st century, is more driven by unanticipated change that strict, formal execution. Leaders who are effective today have the ability to keep their organizations agile, goal-focused and moving forward to attaining challenging objectives despite