Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
Monopolistic and Oligopolistic Competitions
Comparison between monopolistic competition and oligopolistic competition
Monopolistic competition is a market structure where large number of firms sells differentiated products that are highly substitutes to one another but not perfect substitutes. There is a free entry and exist in the monopolistic competition, and the firms demand curves are downward sloping. Examples of a monopolistic competition are the firms producing clothing, toothpaste, restaurants etc. On the other hand, oligopolistic competition is a market structure where there are few firms competing among one another. There is a barrier of entry because of the economic of scale, patent, and the technology involved in setting up the firm and the presence of few firms give the firms advantage to make excess profits. Examples of oligopolistic competitive market structures are automobiles, steel, aluminium, petrochemicals, and electrical equipments. While there are few firms in the oligopolistic market, there are still competitions among firms. Example of the interest rates that the banks charge on loans reveals the competitive nature of the oligopolistic markets.
Interest rates are the prices that the banks charge for lending money to borrowers.
In the oligopolistic competitions, the interests rates that the bank charges large corporations for the short-term loans are called the prime rate. The changes in prime rates cause interest rates in the money markets to rise or fall substantially. The changes in the prime rates will make major banks to follow suit by changing their rates. The reactions of the major banks will make other banks to follow suit within few days. Changes in the interest rates will make the active banks to enter the market and non-active bank to exit the industry. (Totzek, 2011). In the long run, the firms in the oligopolistic market may form collusion to continue enjoy higher profits. For example, the interest rates charged by the commercial banks are very similar. The higher profits enjoyed by the commercial banks may not be affected with the change in the interest rates because major commercial banks charge the same interest rates on the money borrowed by customers.
However, in the monopolistic competitions, the increase in the interest rates will make the weaker firms to exist the market and strong firms to enter the market. In the contemporary business environment, many firms depend on the bank loans to raise capital. Since there are fierce competitions among firms in the monopolistic competitive markets, firms will likely to raise capital from banks to satisfy the market obligations such as advertising, packaging etc. With increase in the interest rates, many weak firms will be forced to exit the market.
Under the monopolistic competition, change in the consumer income has different impact on product prices. In the short run, when entry into the market may not be possible, the increase in the consumer income make the demand for the products to be less elastic because firms will charge high prices for their products, and thereby making abnormal profits. From the illustration in Fig 1, in the short run, firms make profit when MR= MC and the MR < P. There is an also downward sloping demand of monopolistic competition where the demand is relative elastic because of the good substitutes.
Fig 1: Monopolistic Competition in the Short run and Long run
However, in the long run, more firms will enter the markets because firms in the monopolistic competitive market are making higher profits, thereby leading to tougher competitions among firms. To attract more customers, firm will decrease their prices leading to the decrease in profits. The weaker firms will exit the market because of the decrease in profits.(Tarasov, 2011). From the illustration in the Fig 1, there will be no economic profit because P = AC and more firms are attracted to the industry which makes the price to fall.
Likewise the behaviour of the monopolistic competitive markets, the changes in the consumer income also makes the firms in the oligopolistic markets to charge higher prices in the short run. For example, if there is increase in the consumer income, the oligopolistic firms will increase the price of their products to make higher profits since there is increase in the purchasing power of consumers based on the increase in wages. Unlike monopolistic market competition where weaker firms exist market in long run when there is decrease in…[continue]
"Monopolistic And Oligopolistic Competitions Comparison Between Monopolistic" (2011, September 02) Retrieved December 8, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/monopolistic-and-oligopolistic-competitions-51971
"Monopolistic And Oligopolistic Competitions Comparison Between Monopolistic" 02 September 2011. Web.8 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/monopolistic-and-oligopolistic-competitions-51971>
"Monopolistic And Oligopolistic Competitions Comparison Between Monopolistic", 02 September 2011, Accessed.8 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/monopolistic-and-oligopolistic-competitions-51971
Microeconomics: Differentiating Between Market Structures in an Organization Microeconomics Electronics Industry The electronics industry has become one of the largest and fastest growing industries which generate billions of dollars every year. The major products of this industry include personal computers, laptops, mobile phones, televisions, digital cameras, music players, telephones, speakers, recording media, and all types of accessories for these products. The operations, performance, and profitability of the participants of electronics industry is affected
The consumer's indifference curve would be on a lower budget line against their preference but this would have effects of its own beyond individual consumers (below). On the other hand if we shifted the good on the X axis to "rent" and called that at its possible minimum to begin with (i.e. without substitute outside the model), then a cut in SNAP that decreased purchasing power for both goods
market structures and the pricing strategies which are specifically related to each of them. The introductory section of the paper gives an overview of the four major types of market structures and explains the main features which draw distinguishing lines between them. These major types of market structures are perfect competition, monopolistic competition, monopoly, and oligopoly. The second section discusses the pricing strategies which are used by competitors in
market structures in detail and analyses the pricing strategies that the firms have to undertake when they operate in different regimes. The case study on Toyota is considered next, which indicates that firms competing in various structures does not only have to focus on price and quantity ceteris paribus, they also have to consider external and internal variables that have a bearing on these decisions. Introduction to Market Structures Market structures
The intersection determines the amount of investment in education / productivity factors by all individuals and institutions. The major criticisms to the Neoclassical model come from the assumption competition holds, namely that individuals act to maximize profit in all scenarios; factor mobility is unlimited; marginal returns to labor don't increase with wage rates, and other simplifications which rarely hold true in the workforce. Nor are all workers the same to
Managerial Economics Get the financial data for a company or organization for five years. From the balance sheet and the income statement for the company or organization develop regression line formulae for each line item and predict those line item revenues and costs over the next five years. Don't do prediction for any item in the statement less than 10% of the total sales on the incomes statement or 10% of
Metricum International Business Management Review of International Strategy at Metricum Overview of the Metricum Company Metricum is an SME manufacturer of materials handling equipment and intelligent handling systems. It has been based in the east of England for the last 28 years and has been catering to clients in several parts of the world. The company exports equipment to 40 countries around the world and has manufacturing facilities in Sweden and China in addition