They are never useful in the solving of the disputes by invoking worldly views. They are indeed a complex set of legal traditions since they do succeed in the reconciliation of otherwise different theoretical views. The second source of information is facts. Multivalence is an important factor in the explanation of the various contemporary issues that affect our complex societies. A society that consists of different groups of people who have multiple legal claims. There are also various legal traditions as well as identities that do overlap in extremely close proximity. There are also several conflicting principles. The conflicting principles do lead to a general weakening of the state legal system. The multivalent though does provide a way of reconciling the various legal traditions, family law, succession and potential status in a way that is considered nonviolent. The concept of multivalence within the given tradition is indeed an inherent limit to the process of external expansion. The existing internal ambiguity does create doubts regarding the process of external expansion. The main questions on this regards the nature of what is to be expanded and the reasons as to why it is necessary to competing the internal views as well as the external ones. Such doubts are welcome in the multivalent thought and d represents various truths such as:

Religious

Ecological

Ethical and Rational ones.

Each of these is a representation of enormous efforts that extends over a protracted amount of time. Each and every major complex tradition does provide a different thing to the world that is not provided by another. The fact that the legal theme does persist and therefore the traditions too persist. They are a perfect reminder of the fact that we must qualify as well as limit ourselves. Each of these therefore is important in ensuring that diversity exists (Anton, 1995).

The sustenance of diversity means...

We are also put in a situation that demands that we see the traditions as being mutually independent so that the loss of any of them implies the loss of the rest. One also has to see the traditions as their own in certain circles since each of them are dependent of each other. It implies that we have to consider the western bivalent thought as being inadequate and then subsequently abandoning them
The attainment of diversity in law is meant to have positive impact in the legal process since it leads to an improved level of communication between the various layers of the world. This in turn enhances the prospects of peaceful settlements of disputes in order to enhance peaceful missions. The individualistic traditions may therefore borrow and utilize informal notions of normatively in order to complement themselves. The collective tradition on the other hand may borrow and utilize the instruments of self-empowerment in order to complement them too.

The recognition as well as the acceptance of the rather diverse nature of the legal traditions of this world has major implications for various identities which people in this world do accord them. The recognition of the tradition of others is in a way a person's way of adhering to these traditions.