NATO's Controversial Relationship in Afghanistan Research Paper

Download this Research Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Research Paper:



European states generally backed NATO and the U.S. In the fight against terrorism. However, the EU appeared to be skeptical a propos the principal aims of the war and highlighted the fact that they were only willing to assume responsibility for their own actions in Afghanistan, claiming that they were primarily interested in defending the concept of peace through eliminating the terrorist threat. In an attempt to support the Afghanistan intervention, the EU has focused on investing as little finances as possible concomitantly with committing an effective strategy meant to guarantee that its mission would not be impeded.

NATO authorities acknowledged the fact that Russia assistance should not be ignored and that the country played an essential role in the Afghanistan Intervention. Considering Russia's complex military system and that the country was close to the Middle Eastern strategic point, it seems natural that NATO was dedicated to have Putin join the Afghanistan war.

While the relationship between Russia and the U.S. was tensioned as a result of George W. Bush's decision to abandon the anti-ballistic missile treaty signed in 1972, matters were resolved in November 2001, at the time when George Robertson (then NATO's Secretary-General) suggested that Russia should be provided with a status of equality with the nineteen members of NATO, thus having the right of decision in regard to the various topics emerging along with plans adopted for the Afghanistan war. Putin was interested in changing the way Russia was perceived by most of the world at the time and realized that one of the most excellent methods of doing so was to support NATO and the U.S. In the struggle in opposition to terrorism and as a consequence in the Afghanistan war.

While Russia is generally perceived as an equal partner in the fight against terrorism and in the Afghanistan intervention, critics have expressed uncertainty regarding this topic. Liberal authorities in Russia are apparently inclined to believe that their country did not actually benefit from its involvement in the Afghanistan war and that the U.S. And NATO basically used it as a tool. Putin was aware that he could use the situation as a means to benefit the overall condition concerning Russia's international relationships. Even with that, he did not want to behave similar to Yeltsin or Gorbachev, who were believed by the majority of Russians to be peons in the hands of the U.S. And one of the main reasons for which their country had lost prestige in the recent years. There were several critiques coming from Russian individuals on the topic of the Afghanistan war, relating to how the U.S.'s approach was exaggerated and that the North American country was merely trying to impose its supremacy as a world superpower through behaving as a principal actor in the fight against terrorism and by denying other countries the right to get equally involved in the state of affairs.

Bibliography:

Cross, S. Russia's Relationship with the United States/NATO in the U.S.-led Global War on Terrorism, the Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 19: 2, 175 -- 192, p. 180.

Duffy, H. The "war on terror" and the framework of international law, Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 133.

Sloan, S.R. NATO, the European Union, and the Atlantic community: the transatlantic bargain challenged. Rowman & Littlefield, 2005, p. 267.

H. Duffy, the "war on terror" and the framework of international law, Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 133.

S. Cross, Russia's Relationship with the United States/NATO in the U.S.-led Global War on Terrorism, the Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 19: 2, 175 -- 192, p. 178.

S. Cross, Russia's Relationship with the United States/NATO in the U.S.-led Global War on Terrorism, the Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 19: 2, 175 -- 192, p. 178, p. 179.

H. Duffy, the "war on terror" and the framework of international law, Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 193.

H. Duffy, the "war on terror" and the framework of international law, Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 193.

Ibid.

S.R. Sloan. NATO, the European Union, and the Atlantic community: the transatlantic bargain challenged. Rowman & Littlefield, 2005, p. 267.

S. Cross, Russia's Relationship with the United States/NATO in the U.S.-led Global War on Terrorism, the Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 19: 2, 175 --…[continue]

Cite This Research Paper:

"NATO's Controversial Relationship In Afghanistan" (2010, November 08) Retrieved December 2, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/nato-controversial-relationship-in-afghanistan-6979

"NATO's Controversial Relationship In Afghanistan" 08 November 2010. Web.2 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/nato-controversial-relationship-in-afghanistan-6979>

"NATO's Controversial Relationship In Afghanistan", 08 November 2010, Accessed.2 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/nato-controversial-relationship-in-afghanistan-6979

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Afghanistan Is a Natural Crossroad

    The Karzai government adopted a five-point plan for accountability. It refused amnesty for gross violators of human rights abuses. An action plan was created by Afghan officials and the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission, with the support of the United Nations and the international community. The plan consisted of a five-part strategy for peace, justice and reconciliation in Afghanistan. It contained measures to concretely recognize and remember the sufferings

  • European Union s Common Foreign and

    To achieve these various purposes, NATO embarked on a series of interlocking efforts during the 1990s that were intended to provide some aspect of an overall concept of security. A series of initiatives resulted in NATO accepting new members with the possibility of still further additions in the future, crafted the Partnership for Peace and created the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council; entered into a Founding Act with Russia and a Charter

  • War in Afghanistan Following the

    Fallout A section of commentators have taken issue with the manner in which the federal government denied suspected terrorist the due process of law as stipulated under the constitution. The government even commissioned the establishment of a torture chamber in Guantanamo Bay. This amounts to gross violation of human rights and civil liberties. There is another clause in the patriot act dubbed "enhanced surveillance procedures," which allows federal authorities to gather

  • Consecutive Executive George W Obama

    Kant was no exception to the paradigmatic priorities (i.e. objectivity as knowledge) of the era, and brief reference to the episteme is serves accuracy in discursive analysis of this heritage within American politics and policy thought. For instance, Kant's Critique of Judgment is enormously influential in establishing a connection between judgment and political and moral precepts to conduct in communities. Intellectual lineage to Kant's model of Enlightenment 'reason" combines

  • 2012 Presidential Election President Barack Obama vs Governor Mitt...

    Presidential elections in the U.S.A. The United States Presidential election that was held on 6th November, 2012 was the 57th in the United States history. Such elections are held after every four years. The Democratic Party nominee was President Barack Obama while his running mate was Vice-President Joseph Biden. Both were re-elected for a second term in office. Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney and his running mate Paul Ryan were President

  • Presidency and the Congress From

    Other Congressional Democrats too are withdrawing their support of the president, including Senator Paul Kirk, Jr. Of Massachusetts. Health care reform too has seen a parting of the ways for some Democrats and the president. Health care reform was one of the primary issues President Obama focused on during his campaign. The historic vote in the House of Representatives brought him one step closer to seeing this reform come to

  • Maritime Piracy and Terrorism in

    This is to note that "Trinidad and Tobago alone account for 80% (1st quarter 2004) of all U.S. LNG imports, up from 68% in 2002. Therefore, any incident involving an LNG tanker along the Caribbean routes could harm not only U.S. energy security but also the economies of the Caribbean islands, affecting tourism and other industries." (Kelshell, 1) Such a trajectory has all the markings of an Al-Qaeda styled


Read Full Research Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved