No Child Left Behind NCLB Term Paper

Download this Term Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Term Paper:

The belief that the achievement of students in the United States schools was falling behind other countries led politicians in the 1970s to instigate a minimum competency testing movement to reform our schools. States began to rely on tests of basic skills to ensure, in theory, that all students would learn at least the minimum needed to be a productive citizen (Amrein & Berliner).

In 1983, the National Commission of Education released a Nation at Risk, the most influential report on education in the past several decades. A Nation at Risk called for an end to the minimum. The competency testing movement and the beginning of the high-stakes testing movement that would raise the nation's standards of achievement drastically. This was a direct result of the perception that America was falling behind other nations in the education of their youth.

In discussing current high-stakes testing practices, test scores were often promoted as diagnostic tools useful for identifying a student's achievement deficits and assets; they were rarely used for such purposes when they emanated from large-scale testing programs. Two major problems were the cause of this. First, test scores were often reported in the summer after students exited each grade and second, there were usually too few items on any one topic or area to be used in a diagnostic way. As a result of these factors, scores on large-scale assessments were most often used simply to distribute rewards and sanctions. This contributed to the corruptions and distortions predicted by the uncertainty principle.

The researchers discussed results from the scores of the ACT, SAT, AP and NAEP. One outcome that the researchers found was that states that did not have high-stakes testing performed better on the ACT and SAT than states that did have high-stakes testing. Overall, the researchers found the effects of high-stakes, high school achievement tests had a negative effect on ACT, SAT, AP and NAEP performance.

Cronin, et al. (2005) conducted a study on the impact of the NCLB Act on student achievement and growth. This study applied the idea of scientifically-based research to the impact of the law itself. NCLB was a very complex law with aspects as diverse as content standards and school choice. This study was a scientifically- based investigation of the impact of NCLB on student achievement and growth.

The results of this study showed that mathematics and reading scores had improved over the past two years under NCLB. Student growth scores decreased since NCLB was implemented. Students in grades with state tests had higher achievement and growth than student who were not. Changes in performance in mathematics were greater than those in reading since NCLB was implemented. Student growth in every ethnic group had decreased slightly since NCLB was implemented. Finally, achievement growth of Hispanic students in every grade and subject area tended to be lower than the achievement growth of White students with exactly the same initial score.

Popham (1999) conducted a study on why standardized tests did not measure educational quality. The researcher stated that these days if a school's standardized test scores were high, people thought the school's staff was effective. If a school's standardized test scores were low, people saw the school's staff as ineffective. In either case, because the wrong yardstick was measuring educational quality, those evaluations were apt to be in error.

The researcher suggests a three-pronged attack on the problem. First, the researcher thinks that one needs to learn more about the viscera of standardized achievement tests. Second, one needs to carry out an effective educational campaign so that educational colleagues, parents of children in school, and educational policymakers understand what the evaluative shortcomings of standardized achievement tests really are. Finally, the researcher states that one needs to arrange a more appropriate form of assessment-based evidence.

Lombardi and Burke (1999) conducted a study on whether or not to test students. This study examines the use of standardized achievement testing in West Virginia. Participants were students and teachers in Mineral County. The researches results revealed that, in general, all grades improved when the scores of students with individualized educational programs (IEPs) were eliminated. For the most part, general educators felt that too much emphasis was being put on one type of assessment, were very concerned about the inclusion of special education students' scores in aggregate test results, and were concerned that they had not received adequate support to effectively teach special education students in their general classes. Special education teachers indicated that they were under pressure from general educators to exclude standardized testing on students' IEPs.

Gibson (1997) conducted a comparative study of achievement on ninth-grade students who passed and failed sections of the Ohio Ninth Grade Proficiency Test. This study sought to find out if the previous classroom grades were just as useful a tool in identifying those students likely to have trouble passing the Ohio Ninth[continue]

Cite This Term Paper:

"No Child Left Behind NCLB " (2008, April 01) Retrieved October 24, 2016, from

"No Child Left Behind NCLB " 01 April 2008. Web.24 October. 2016. <>

"No Child Left Behind NCLB ", 01 April 2008, Accessed.24 October. 2016,

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • No Child Left Behind NCLB

    E. ELL students in public schools. Data provided in the literature demonstrates that by 2030, more than half of all students in American public schools will speak a language other than English (Devoe, 35). In some schools the total number of students whose first language is not English is much higher. Specifically, Devoe reports that in Lawrence, Massachusetts more than 90% of all children enrolled in public schools are ELLs.

  • No Child Left Behind

    For Bush, the "formation and refining of policy proposals" (Kingdon's second process stream in policymaking) came to fruition when he got elected, and began talking to legislators about making educators and schools accountable. Bush gave a little, and pushed a little, and the Congress make its own changes and revisions, and the policy began to take shape. The third part of Kingdon's process stream for Bush (politics) was getting the

  • No Child Left Behind President

    Many states don't want to lower their standards, including Minnesota, New Hampshire and Hawaii, and legislators have seriously debated withdrawing from NCLB, even though it would mean they would lose federal money that is tied to it. However, as the first national suit points out, no funding except the promised NCLB funding is supposed to be tied to it; the Education Department has apparently been making its own interpretation

  • No Child Left Behind Act School Reform

    No Child Left Behind: Promises and Practical Realities The Background of No Child Left Behind year before "No Child Left Behind" (NCLB) became the law of the land, President George W. Bush set the tone for the emerging legislation, saying it would be "the cornerstone of my Administration." He also stated that "too many of our neediest children are being left behind." And when Bush signed NCLB into law on January

  • No Child Left Behind

    Growth models are more reliable in NCLB research because: a) status models depend on data that is "vertically scaled" (measuring from one grade to the next); b) status models can be linked to "individual students or schools over time"; and c) status models sometimes employ "hierarchical linear modeling" -- a more sophisticated and potentially esoteric technique (Azin, p. 74). Meanwhile, growth models are more effective in evaluating the success of

  • No Child Left Behind Act Impact of

    No Child Left Behind Act Impact of the "No Child Left Behind Act" in California Schools The Federal "No Child Left Behind Act of 2001" which President Bush signed into law in January 2002, has been an issue of debate across the country for the last two years. Its impact on public education has varied from state to state. According to the "No Child Left Behind Act of 2001," every state must

  • No Child Left Behind and Black Males

    No Child Left Behind and Black Males No child left behind No Child Left Behind: Cause and Effect Essay The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) was passed in 2001 in order to improve overall students' performance and to decrease the performance gap between minority and mainstream students. However other effects have emerged since its implementation. Through this cause and effect essay, author sheds light on effects of the NCLB. It has been

Read Full Term Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved