Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y, Open Systems Theory, and in general a recognition of the complexities of what fosters and supports greater productivity on the part of people.
At this point the evolution of organizational theories begins looking at how the factors of the distribution of knowledge, the integration of process for knowledge management, and in general the recognition of personal productivity as the basis of competitive advantage. This specific phase in the evolution of organizational theories is so fundamentally disruptive to previous theories that the effects are found in global economic theories, including the theory of comparative advantage. One of the thought leaders in the area, Dr. Michael Porter (1990, pp. 32-78) whose groundbreaking analysis of productivity pointed to individual's ability to fundamentally re-order processes would eventually surface in the 21st century as a Business process Management (BPM) revolution. When one considers the evolutionary shift from seeing assets as the primary means of productivity to personal worker productivity, the corresponding growth in organizations' cultures also begins to grow in importance (Cordes, 2007, pp. 747-767). Cultures and their ability to quickly assimilate and create a shared knowledge base, a collective memory if you will, is becoming increasingly critical.
Oliver, Kondal, Kandadi, 2006, pp. 6-24). Also attributable to this specific evolutionary aspect of organizational theories is an increasing reliance on using technologies to manage and quickly access the shared memory of the organization. In fact the use of technology to further support the use of collective knowledge is beginning to have a reciprocal effect on organizational theory (Volkoff, Strong, Elmes, 2007, pp. 832-848), forcing more selective and targeted divisions of labor and a more decentralized delegation of authority. This has also lead to line and staff authority being more aligned to the individualized needs of projects and less hierarchical, centralized than had been the case in previous phases of organizational theory evolution. From the perspective of personal productivity being the dominant form of lasting competitive advantage as defined by Porter, the balance of power has begun to shift from authoritarian-based theories to more developmental and in highly skilled occupations, democratic approaches to management. Organizational theories now reflect the more heterogeneous aspects of cultures, systems, and processes for managing knowledge. In short, organizational theories have now become the most critical aspect of how organizations' structures evolve and grow over time. The emergence of contingency and systems theories are illustrative of this latest evolution of organizational theories. No longer is it enough to concentrate on simply one aspect or area of an organization, the combined effects of the integrative processes are what matter most today. Across these integrative aspects is a common core orientation on how to enable employees to attain the highest levels of performance possible.
Contemporary organizational theories are indeed a product of a series of evolutionary processes, as this paper illustrates. The progression of organizational theories has in fact grown to become more reciprocal with other factors than ever before, as the shift from capital and equipment to individuals' contributions has proven to be the new foundation for lasting competitive advantage.
Christian Cordes. "The Role of "Instincts" in the Development of Corporate Cultures." Journal of Economic Issues 41.3 (2007): 747-764. ABI/INFORM Global. ProQuest.13 Jan. 2008
Gerald F. Davis. "Mechanisms and the Theory of Organizations. " Journal of Management Inquiry 15.2 (2006): 114-118. ABI/INFORM Global. ProQuest. 15 Jan. 2008
Anil K. Gupta, Paul E. Tesluk, M Susan Taylor. "Innovation at and Across Multiple Levels of Analysis. " Organization Science 18.6 (2007): 885-897,1022-1023. ABI/INFORM Global. ProQuest;14 Jan. 2008 www.proquest.com
Michael G. Jacobides. "The architecture and design of organizational capabilities. " Industrial and Corporate Change 15.1 (2006): 151. ABI/INFORM Global. ProQuest. 13 Jan. 2008
James a Kitts, Paul T. Trowbridge. "Shape up or ship out: social networks, turnover, and organizational culture. " Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 13.4 (2007): 333-353. ABI/INFORM Global. ProQuest 12 Jan. 2008
Alistair Mutch. "Organization Theory and Military Metaphor: Time for a Reappraisal? " Organization 13.6 (2006): 751-769. ABI/INFORM Global. ProQuest. 12 Jan. 2008
Stan Oliver, Kondal Reddy Kandadi. "How to develop knowledge culture in organizations? A multiple case study of large distributed organizations. " Journal of Knowledge Management 10.4 (2006): 6-24. ABI/INFORM Global. ProQuest. 11 Jan. 2008
Michael Porter - the Competitive Advantage of…[continue]
"Organizational Theories As A Product" (2008, January 16) Retrieved October 28, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/organizational-theories-as-a-product-32862
"Organizational Theories As A Product" 16 January 2008. Web.28 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/organizational-theories-as-a-product-32862>
"Organizational Theories As A Product", 16 January 2008, Accessed.28 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/organizational-theories-as-a-product-32862
Organizational Theory #1 Create a code of ethics for an organization of your choice. For each point in the code of ethics, describe an ethical dilemma that would be resolved using the code of ethics. All employees will conduct business honestly and ethically. We will constantly improve the quality of our services, products and operations and create a reputation for honesty, fairness, respect, responsibility, integrity, trust and sound business judgment. (Provides a
Organizational Theory #2 What core competences give an organization competitive advantage? What are examples of an organization's functional-level strategies? Core competencies are those capabilities that are critical to a business achieving a competitive advantage in the marketplace. Typically, core competencies can be identified by certain common characteristics -- offering a benefit to the customer, difficult to imitate, uniquely identify the organization and easily leveraged to create many products or operate in many
Organizational Analysis: General Health Products The organization that I've selected for consideration is called General Health Products. The company specializes in a range of bandages, lotions and other materials used for the treatment of individuals with open wounds, bed sores or deep skin tears. The assessment below considers the outlook for General Health both as a consequence of internal realities and external forces. Chart of Organization's Domain Products Specific Forces General Forces Important Forces Bandages, wound care
Organizational Theory Organizations Environment Each perspective examines organizations perceived relationships environment differently. Describe differences. What enacted features organization's (U.S. Postal Service) environment ways features displayed perceived consistent perspectives? Text: Organization Theory by Mary Jo Hatch. Each perspective examines organizations and their perceived relationships to the environment differently. For this discussion, describe these differences. Contingency theory stresses the fact that an organization's decision-making processes are in constant dialogue with the environment. An organization's policies
The theory sees human organizational behaviors and conceptions culturally bound, rather than natural, unlike advocates of systems theory. Systems theory has been more influenced by sociology and linguistics than the natural sciences. Analyzing symbolic interpretations may be more useful in organizations serving diverse populations: if a public health organization wants to alleviate the prevalence of diabetes in an area, it is not enough to more effectively disseminate information through the
The goal is approached through three distinct channels -- (1) a bottom up approach, focused on the individual administrator; (2) a top down approach focused on organizational culture, and (3) the approach to values from a functional and practical angle. The conclusions can easily be extrapolated to the totality of entities, public or private, to reveal how an incremental emphasis is being placed on culture, ideologies, reform and efficiency. The
At the same time, this already discovered knowledge can be shared with the existing employees on a common forum and then implemented by each in part under the form of imitation. As we can see, with positive impacts, innovation and imitation can be successfully implemented internally, within the organization, and can help in maximizing the organization's activity. As we can see, organizational behavior helps, to some degree, shape the organization's