Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … reason
What is the raison d'etat ( reason for the existence of the state)? Compare and contrast the views presented by theorists on the purpose, role, and existence of governments: Jean Bodin, Jacques Bossuet, James II, Thomas Hobbes, and John Locke. Discuss how political views reflected evolving views on human nature, humanity's place, and the Glorious Revolution.
The concept of human liberty and the purpose of the state in Western Civilization have evolved over time. Jean Bodin, the French philosopher and jurist, was one of the first philosophers to advance the idea that as well as the loyalty the populace owed to the sovereign, the sovereign likewise had an obligation to educate the population in kind. Bodin wrote in his Six Books of the Commonwealth (Republique): "those who have written on the duties of magistrates and other similar books are wrong to support the idea that the Estates of the People [Estates General] are more important than the prince. Such ideas make obedient subjects revolt when they should obey their sovereign prince […] These notions are absurd (absurdes) and incompatible (incompatibles) (translated by Tuchetti 2010). Bodin opposed the idea that...
This moderate view stands in stark contrast to Jacques Bossuet's philosophy and its advocacy of the divine right of kings. To resist the sovereign was to resist God as well as the ruler, according to Bossuet. The reason for the state's existence was to mirror the relationship between God and humanity in the earthly relationship between the king and humanity.
Not all advocates of strong monarchical authority were advocates of divine right, however. Thomas Hobbes took a very practical and deflationary view of religion. Hobbes denied that human beings had free will, for example, which was an important part of religious orthodoxy at the time. He believed that reason for the existence of the state was to promote social order. Life in the absence of state control, would be nasty, brutish and short. Even if monarchs might be tyrants, their reign was better than the alternative, which would be chaos (Duncan 2009).
In contrast, John Locke took…
References
Duncan, Stewart. (2009). Thomas Hobbes. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Retrieved November 4, 2011 at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hobbes/
Turchetti, Mario. (2010). Jean Bodin. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved November 4, 2011 at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/bodin/
Uzgalis, William. (2008). John Locke. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Retrieved November 4, 2011 at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke/#SecTreGov
This belief came in response to the realities of the time that saw corruption and lust for riches as the main interests in the political life. Both Gandhi and Machiavelli saw self restrain as an important quality, even though the reasons deferred. In today's political life, there is more and more evidence of the applicability of the concepts advocated by Machiavelli centuries ago. The constant use of the notion Machiavellian
More precisely, the sovereignty promoted by the realists acknowledges the fact that the state has the right to accept or refuse to take part in a regime. Therefore, event the regimes promoted by institutionalism still depend on the actual will of the states. The United Nations represents a valid example in this sense. Therefore, its structure was indeed created on the basis of the idealist line of thought, giving equal
The lack of action over Rwanda should be the defining scandal of the presidency Bill Clinton. Yet in the slew of articles on the Clinton years that followed Clinton's departure from power, there was barely a mention of the genocide." The UN, pressured by the British and the U.S., and others, refused to use the word "genocide" during the event, or afterward when it issued its official statement of condemnation