Recycling Americans Work Too Hard Research Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
951
Cite

As of now, there are significant "barriers" in place preventing millions of Americans from having access to convenient recycling (American Beverage Association). The warrants substantiating the claims are straightforward. For one, America is in the midst of an economic recession. Many Americans have lost their jobs and can barely afford to pay for their rent, food, and medical bills. If it will cost Americans money to recycle items like televisions, then Americans are simply going to rebel. Second, Americans cannot be expected to sort their garbage. The process is dirty, it takes up too much time out of the day, and it requires Americans to actually read the packages they are buying. Americans need a simpler solution, but none has been found yet. In one locality, a custodian was "left sifting through waste, trying to pull out recyclables and garbage mixed in the wrong bins," (Carberry). This shows that recycling is proving to be a more complicated task for Americans than was previously believed by city governments. The children's book Garbage and Recycling by Rosie Harlow makes recycling seem simple. Recycling should be that simple for adults, who are the property owners paying the bills. Finally, it can be inferred that because millions of Americans do not have access to curbside recycling that those Americans are disadvantaged and discriminated against. Americans living in areas without curbside recycling would actually have to carry or drive their garbage somewhere. This costs money, which substantiates the first warrant in the argument. This is also complicated, as even when the consumer...

...

Even if curbside recycling were extended to all Americans, it is likely that many would still find it too complicated and too time consuming to carry out.
Therefore, recycling is an activity that is too complicated and too time-consuming for Americans. Americans cannot afford to recycle if it costs extra money or if extra driving is required. Americans cannot read the labels on their plastic or be expected to tell the difference between magazines and newspapers. Instead, Americans should put random pieces of garbage in a bin and hope for the best.

Works Cited

American Beverage Association. "Independent Survey of Communities Shows Recycling Access Widespread With Room for Growth." 30 Oct. 2009. Retrieved online; http://www.ameribev.org/minisites/recycling/news-and-resources/readmore.php?id=174

Carberry, Libby. "Taking out the trash: New recycling initiative tackles lack of enviornmental action at South." The Lion's Roar. Retrieved online: http://thelionsroar.com/news/3476/

Granger, Trey. "To Electronics Questions." Earth911. Retrieved online: http://earth911.com/news/2010/03/29/your-top-electronics-questions/

Harlow, Rosie. Garbage and Recycling. Kingfisher.

Heimlich, Joe E. "Recycling." Ohio State University Fact Sheet CDFS-108-98. Retrieved online: http://ohioline.osu.edu/cd-fact/0108.html

McNatt, Marissa. "What NOT to Put in the Bin." Earth911. Retrieved online: http://earth911.com/news/2010/03/22/what-not-to-put-in-the-bin/

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

American Beverage Association. "Independent Survey of Communities Shows Recycling Access Widespread With Room for Growth." 30 Oct. 2009. Retrieved online; http://www.ameribev.org/minisites/recycling/news-and-resources/readmore.php?id=174

Carberry, Libby. "Taking out the trash: New recycling initiative tackles lack of enviornmental action at South." The Lion's Roar. Retrieved online: http://thelionsroar.com/news/3476/

Granger, Trey. "To Electronics Questions." Earth911. Retrieved online: http://earth911.com/news/2010/03/29/your-top-electronics-questions/

Harlow, Rosie. Garbage and Recycling. Kingfisher.
Heimlich, Joe E. "Recycling." Ohio State University Fact Sheet CDFS-108-98. Retrieved online: http://ohioline.osu.edu/cd-fact/0108.html
McNatt, Marissa. "What NOT to Put in the Bin." Earth911. Retrieved online: http://earth911.com/news/2010/03/22/what-not-to-put-in-the-bin/


Cite this Document:

"Recycling Americans Work Too Hard" (2010, December 06) Retrieved April 27, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/recycling-americans-work-too-hard-11672

"Recycling Americans Work Too Hard" 06 December 2010. Web.27 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/recycling-americans-work-too-hard-11672>

"Recycling Americans Work Too Hard", 06 December 2010, Accessed.27 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/recycling-americans-work-too-hard-11672

Related Documents

Recycling and Trash Collection in Modern Countries Garbage becomes a community problem in many countries. The household contributes a big part of the national municipal solid waste, but indeed the bigger part comes from the industry and business operations. For the U.S., this waste product has hit a very astonishing count. Goldstein, N. And Madtes, C. (2000) claimed that the states had produced around 409,029,000 tons of municipal solid waste in

About.com. 2011. Some facts about the actual costs of recycling vs. traditional disposal expenses is presented by this article, and is certainly worthy of examination: a) a well-run curbside recycling program costs between $50 and $150 per ton; b) typically a trash collection and disposal program costs between $70 to $200 per ton. When New York City discovered that it was losing money on its recycling program in 2002, it eliminated

Recycling in the Household
PAGES 4 WORDS 1628

Solution for Recycling in Households Providing Convenient and Accessible Solutions to Recycling, Identifying what Motivates People to Recycle and Policies that May Stifle Recycling Recycling has become an important aspect of environmental protection. When people use material that has been recycled it reduces energy and resources spent on deriving products from raw materials. This is especially true of aluminum and paper. Most modern countries have taken a step to increase recycling. Some

Mobile phones, computers, and similar electronics are now recyclable and people need to find means of sending such materials to be recycled properly. Batteries are among the most damaging materials for the environment as they are made out of metals, acids, and other materials which are very polluting. Most countries have recycling bins for objects with a high rate of pollution within the reach of mainly all of their people.

This growth rate will be influenced by several factors: droughts; stringent EPA regulations on waste and potable water; growing public awareness; and "upcoming replacements of current wastewater systems." Works Cited Industry News. "Don't Throw Out the Bathwater." Pollution Engineering 38.4 (2006): 8-8. Marshall, Jessica. "From Coffee Cup to Compost." New Scientist. 193.2598 (2007): 9-9. Reilly, Michael. "Recycled plastic to get clean bill of health." Scientist. 194.2603 (2007): 58-58. Schussler, Stefan. "Recycling Fluorescent Bulbs Now Cool."

It is to encourage less consumption: that is all. Remember that during wartime, eggs, butter, sugar, coffee, and other products were rationed as well. Will the beef industry suffer? Of course -- but the sad truth is that if we continue as we are, Americans in the future will suffer far worse. Additionally, people in other agricultural-related industries will benefit from the ban because of increased consumption of other products. Another