Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
" He also appointed two individuals to distribute the grain, and like all political appointments during this time period, only individuals who met with Augustus' approval had any enforcement power. Thus he gave the appearance of being concerned with the people's welfare, of not wanting to be a dictator, yet gained more political and popular power.
Augustus' power was derived from a popular, if not an electoral mandate that extended even to the histories written about him after his death. For example, in what seems like a blatant contradiction, although Augustus substantially increased the territory of Rome, it was said: "he never made war on any nation without just and due cause" by Cassius Dio. Augustus was beloved because he restored many ancient works of art, because he spoke highly of Rome's great past, and commissioned many public acts of beautification and public works. He was also willing to delegate some authority to make the city safer for the citizens, and even allowed some exercise of republican elections for local officials, as a kind of safety valve for popular discontent that might arise regarding his absolute authority: "He divided the area of the city into regions and wards, arranging that the former should be under the charge of magistrates selected each year by lot, and the latter under 'masters' elected by the inhabitants of the respective neighborhoods. To guard against fires he devised a system of stations of night watchmen, and to control the floods he widened and cleared out the channel of the Tiber." Also in keeping with the popular will, Augustus disbanded unpopular guilds, burned old debts, and used his authority in a way that was absolute but merciful in the eyes of the common Roman populace. He both honored republican tradition, and did away with republican traditions to make a show of his love of the people. The city also functioned more effectively because of his projects and his wise spending of public money, and he did allow some local elections to ensure the people's immediate needs were honored.
However, even the great Augustus met with some resistance when he tried to be overly prescriptive regarding Roman citizen's personal lives. When he became concerned about the falling Roman birthrate of legitimate citizens "he revised existing laws and enacted some new ones, for example, on extravagance, on adultery and chastity, on bribery, and on the encouragement of marriage among the various classes of citizens. Having made somewhat more stringent changes in the last of these than in the others, he was unable to carry it out because of an open revolt against its provisions, until he had abolished or mitigated a part of the penalties, besides increasing the rewards." Romans were sufficiently guarded about their sexual lives that even a popular leader like Augustus could not and would not be allowed to intrude.
Augustus would not engage in the excesses of the later Caesars like Tiberius or Nero. But his restructuring of Roman governing authority enabled these future tyrants to exercise absolute control over the empire. Rome under his watch effectively became a power governed by an emperor, not legislative authority, although the Senate still existed as a body. Augustus upon his death assumed godlike status and a month was named in his honor. This veneration in the eyes of the Roman people may have been due to Augustus, but later generations would regret this emperor-worship, when later emperors came to power who were less deserving of such praise and authority.
Cassius Dio. Roman History. Translated by Earnest Cary. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge:
Harvard University Press, 1927. Complete text available February 21, 2009 at http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/home.html
Suetonius. "Life of Augustus." Translated by J.C. Rolfe Translation. Loeb Classical Library.
Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1914. Complete text available February 21, 2009 at http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Suetonius/12Caesars/Augustus*.html
Suetonius, "Life of Augustus," Translated by J.C. Rolfe, Loeb Classical Library, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1914), p 165, complete text available February 21, 2009 at http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Suetonius/12Caesars/Augustus*.html
Cassius Dio, Roman History, Translated by Earnest Cary, Loeb Classical Library, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1927), p. 279, complete text available February 21, 2009 at http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/home.html
Cassius Dio, 277
Cassius Dio, p. 285
Cassius Dio, p.285
Suetonius, p. 153
"Reign Of Augustus In What" (2009, February 21) Retrieved December 10, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/reign-of-augustus-in-what-24637
"Reign Of Augustus In What" 21 February 2009. Web.10 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/reign-of-augustus-in-what-24637>
"Reign Of Augustus In What", 21 February 2009, Accessed.10 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/reign-of-augustus-in-what-24637
And besides, Suetonius had access to Augustus' personal correspondence and so had a better glimpse into the character of the man himself -- habitual grammatical lapses and all -- than we do. His vices and eccentricities are here along with his virtues. So where is the coherent coverage of the civil wars? It may simply have been a casualty of Suetonius' "grammatical" biographical approach, which organizes its material along thematic
Octavian and Roman Empire Roman Empire witnessed the rise and fall of so many emperors that it is hard to decide which one of them had the greatest influence on the empire. But historians have still made an attempt to found out just which ruler proved to be most influential in consolidating the empire and they unanimously agree that Octavian was the man who can be called the greatest emperor because
It evolved into a major part of the very fabric of society. Ambassadors from these provinces would report their sacral worship and elaborate religious practices when visiting Rome. Often, these rites and practices were woven into the religious system. The religious system in Rome and in the provinces in the time of Augustus, or Rex Gestae, was steeped in his achievements. He ordered the inscription of these achievements on
Jewish Monotheism Historians of Judaism actually date the strong Jewish emphasis on monotheism somewhat later than expected within Jewish history. The archaeological discovery of idols and artifacts indicating cultic participation from the time of Israel's presence in Canaan has seemed to indicate a relative laxity in actual practice before the Babylonian captivity, while textual criticism seems agreed that most of the Torah's foregrounded statements of strong monotheism date from textual recensions
Conventional literature would come to see Cleopatra as an exploitive whore, responsible for the downfall of virtuous men like the Ptolemies, Julius Caesar and, inevitably, Marc Antony as well. So is this reported by historical accounts such as that by Cassius Dio who reflected that "Indeed she so enchanted and enthralled not only Antony but all others who counted for anything with him that she came to entertain the hope that she would rule the
It provided for fast proceedings, encouraged debtors to reschedule their obligations rather than liquidate and helped creditors recover their claims against bankrupt estates. The 1994 Act also created the National Bankruptcy Commission, charged with investigating further modifications of the bankruptcy law. Latter laws, however, disregarded many of the Commission's recommendations. In April 2005, President George W. Bush signed the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005. Many
In the later years of Marcus Aurelius' reign he made his son, Commodus, co-emperor. Father and son fought together briefly in an effort to forestall another German invasion in 177. The father-son co-rule was short-lived, however, as Marcus Aurelius died in 180 after ruling for 19 years. Although Marcus Aurelius was a competent political leader and successful military leader, as well, perhaps his greatest contribution was in area of philosophy. As