Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
Much as in Mary Shelly's Frankenstein, the Monster has no memory of who he was in parts, only of who he is as a whole distinct person, although that abnormal brain certainly didn't help his feedback system.
Shelly, not our Shelly but Frankenstein's', reminds us that human beings are not just machines and trying to simply piece them together as if the parts are the only concern rarely works out well. However, is Frankenstein the ubermensch that Neitize talked about? If so there are certainly some problems. Of course this is metaphorical, in our experiment Smelly has been pieced together a bit, but more from a teleological standpoint in trying to ascertain the meaning of personality rather than the meaning of life. But in a sense there is also some reality to this metaphor. The scientific breakthroughs in cloning organisms and genetic manipulation, as well as this Smelly situation, certainly put the traditional view of God out to pasture in many ways. If human beings can take hold and shape their own destinies from the womb and before, recently only God's country, than perhaps the concept of a divine being needs to be readjusted to fit more in line with reality. Here is where religion and science often split their perspectives on the divinity and sacredness of life. Is God Dead? Certainly in this modern world the belief in God as the master controller of the universe is under a certain amount of circumspection. But is Neitze's Superman the replacement for God? No. As scientist are often fond of saying that human being are composed of star dust, then, the ultimate conclusion of religion is that everything is divine in nature and the spark of divinity is in us all. Is it the spark of divinity in us all that is our ultimate soul? Does that divinity express itself in Smelly as well as any cloned or naturally occurring organism? Of course it does.
One of the key words in the shaping of this argument is organism, and not just organism alone but organism-environment, there is no one without the other and both shape the personality into what it will ultimately become. So Smelly is the ultimate product of her organism-environment complex of experiences. From simple to complex functions one cannot describe and action without describing the organism and its environment. Walking, for instance, requires the organism to walk and the environment to walk on, i.e. walking down the hall, etc. There is no one without the other, and this holistic system is what Smelly as a finally product must reflect, as do all living things.
But then what about memories of the past? Is Smelly like an amnesia victim who can speak and has intellectual faculty, but no memory of who she is? Certainly not, Sam's memories are now a part of this new, or should one say refurbished, organism. Sam's past would certainly play a large part in the creation of this new person. But would they dominate this new personality structure. Also the fact that Sam has lived all of his previous life as a male will certainly play a part in this development. But Shelly's body is a biologically correct female, right down to the production of hormones. Hormones can certainly play a dominating role when it comes to the emotional part of a personality. Instinctual as well as gender biases must come into play and Sam's intellectual personality will certainly have to blend with these in order to become a fully functioning organism.
But now we have the final dilemma, will Smelly want to be Smelly? If we posit that the ultimate goal and destiny of any human being is all about choice, will Smelly be able to continue as Smelly. Will there be a battle between the intellectual personality of Sam and the body image personality of Shelly, or will they blend into a single Smelly? Perhaps the fact that Sam and Shelly are not strangers and more, that they have been friends for several years will give the blended Smelly some footing to base this longer term relationship upon. Friends tend to take on certain characteristics of each other over time and perhaps all friends have something of a Smelly relationship intrinsic within…[continue]
"Relationship Of Mind And Body" (2007, December 19) Retrieved November 30, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/relationship-of-mind-and-body-33151
"Relationship Of Mind And Body" 19 December 2007. Web.30 November. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/relationship-of-mind-and-body-33151>
"Relationship Of Mind And Body", 19 December 2007, Accessed.30 November. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/relationship-of-mind-and-body-33151
Mind and Body A review of the required literature, Robert Thurman's "Wisdom" (Thurman), Karen Armstrong's "Homo Religiousus" (Armstrong), and Oliver Sacks' "The Mind's Eye: What the Blind See" (Sacks), gives significant insights into how the mind and body must work together to create our lived experience. Though the three authors may initially appear to discuss somewhat different topics, they have vital commonalities. The readings will lead the thoughtful reader to a
As a result, each substance can have multiple attributes. In fact, an entity with an infinite essence will, by definition, have infinite attributes. Spinoza builds upon the idea of an infinite God by going further and stating that absolutely infinite substance is indivisible. This is because, if it were divisible, and if each part would retain the nature of the infinite substance, which would result in there being more than
Mind-Body Problem- Descartes The discussion over the relationship between mind and body that has been intriguing philosophers for a long time is divided into two broad categories: dualism and monism. According to dualism mind and body are two separate substances. There are several types of dualist views including parallelism, epiphenomenalism, occassionalism and interactionism. John Locke and Rene Descartes are among those who laid the foundation of this idea. Whereas Locke and
Homelessness remains a problem in San Francisco because of the lack of affordable housing, incomes below subsistence levels, and behavioral, mental and physical problems (SFDPH). Racial disparities are another social determinant of health (SFDPH, 2003). While White households in the subject State of the report earned more than $75,000, African-American and Latino households earned less than a quarter of that level. According to the California Budget Project, a family with
Mind and the Brain There are several theories that have been proposed for explaining the relationship between one's mind and brain. If truth be told, it can be said that it is one of the most talked about philosophical fields. Mind vs. Brain Mind and brain are interrelated. For a majority of people, there is no difference between the two. Many scientists and philosophers hold the belief that the brain and the mind
In other words, like Plato, the body is inferior and its substance is irrelevant for true and certain knowledge. The intellect with its faculties (judgment, imagination, memory, free will, etc.) is most important. The sixth meditation is the crucial one. He shows the body as "an extended, non-thinking thing" (VII: 78). This is accepted as being close to who he is, but not as close as the mind part. "And
Armstrong arguing mind . brain disticntion a distinction a difference (akin a distinction a kleenex a tissue)? Does adequately explain human conduct? Armstrong - mind theories There is much controversy regarding the difference between mind and brain, as while some support the belief that the mind has nothing to do with the brain because there is nothing physical about the former's functioning, others consider that the mind and the brain are