Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
Religion and Politics
Uses and Abuses of the Concept of Orientalism
There have been many uses and abuses in regard to the cultural and social concept called Orientalism. "Unlike the Americans, the French and British -- less so the Germans, Russians, Spanish, Portuguese, Italians, and Swiss -- have had a long tradition of what I shall be calling Orientalism, a way of coming to terms with the Orient that is based on the Orient's special place in European Western Experience. The Orient is not only adjacent to Europe; it is also the place of Europe's greatest and richest and oldest colonies, the source of its civilizations and languages, its cultural contestant, and one of its deepest and most recurring images of the other. In addition, the Orient has helped to define Europe (or the West) as its contrasting image, idea, personality, and experience. Yet none of this Orient is merely imaginative. The Orient is an integral part of European material civilization and culture. Orientalism expresses and represents that part culturally and even ideologically as a mode of discourse with supporting institutions, vocabulary, scholarship, imagery, doctrines, even colonial bureaucracies and colonial styles." (Said, 1978)
The renowned Palestinian-American intellectual Edward Said's 'Orientalism' has laid claims to being the most significant and influential books on cultural studies since it hit the bookshelves in 1978. The book provided an insight into perceived tactics of Orientalism for western imperialism against third world states and has made Said the resident expert on the topic. One of the root causes for the positive and negative applications of Orientalism has been associated with our western culture's constant need to come to terms with our own history.
Today's Orient represents a system that has been linked by ever changing political forces that have exposed Orientalism into our western learning system. The western cultures have consistently operated under the opinion throughout history as if the Orient was in existence solely for the west's objectives and to expose and utilize it as needed.
It is a mirror image of what is inferior and alien ("Other") to the West. Orientalism is "a manner of regularized (or Orientalized) writing, vision, and study, dominated by imperatives, perspectives, and ideological biases ostensibly suited to the Orient." It is the image of the 'Orient' expressed as an entire system of thought and scholarship." (Said, 1978) Orientalism was a coordinated media attack based on a structure of lies and myths.
A good marketing campaign based on false advertisement would be similar to the Orientalism campaigns that have historically labeled whole nations as underachieving or simply heathens. Orientalism can be seen as an indicator that the western nations held something of an advantage over the third world nations. Today, the Arab world has also been associated with Orientalism. Western cultures have historically seen Islamic laws as a flawed belief structure because these laws were affiliated with what was then considered a false religion. Today's reasoning has been modernized in the sense that the Islamic laws are now considered flawed because there is an assumption by the western cultures that the Islamic laws reject human rights. There is one consistency in the west's beliefs from past and present -- Western reasoning is superior to eastern reasoning.
It will be clear to the reader...that by Orientalism I mean several things, all of them, in my opinion, interdependent. The most readily accepted designation for Orientalism is an academic one, and indeed the label still serves in a number of academic institutions. Anyone who teaches, writes about, or researches the Orient -- and this applies whether the person is an anthropologist, sociologist, historian, or philologist -- either in its specific or its general aspects, is an Orientalist, and what he or she says or does is Orientalism." (Said, 1978)
The uses and abuses of Orientalism have been based on the Orient's unique point in European and Western occurrences. Asia and the Orient were historically the western culture's more significant colonies and therefore a steady source for resources and wealth. The Arab world today could be considered similarly as a significant resource as the demand for natural resources like oil continues grow at a staggering pace.
The early Orientalists made an effort to understand eastern cultures. "It seems evident, therefore, why many of the Company recruits who went to India were predisposed to adopt the basic tenets of Hastings's Orientalism. This is not to argue that they were necessarily influenced by European thought or that Orientalism was simply an intellectual extension of the West on Indian soil. At the other extreme, to argue that civil servants became Orientalists wholly as a result of their Indian experience, or that Orientalism was derived only from conditions of European rule in Asia, is to give too shallow an explanation for too complex a phenomenon. (Kopf, 1969)
Former colonies of the European powers are on a long list and can be divided into distinctions to demonstrate if the Powers settled in the lands or managed from a distance. Settler nations were countries like Australia and the United States and non-settler nations consisted of countries like India and Jamaica. With these colonies came an ever increasing nationalism. With the increase of Nationalism, the west came to see themselves as more superior. It's most important that the Orient was considered a material source of wealth and labor. The West did not wish to purchase resources from the East. The intention was to conquer, colonize, or exploit the nations of the Orient. The westerners then attempted to rationalize their actions so as not to be seen as imperialists.
Related to this academic tradition, whose fortunes, transmigration's, specialization's, and transmissions are in part the subject of this study, is a more general meaning for Orientalism. Orientalism is a style of thought based upon ontological and epistemological distinction made between "the Orient" and (most of the time) "the Occident." Thus a very large mass of writers, among who are poet, novelists, philosophers, political theorists, economists, and imperial administrators, have accepted the basic distinction between East and West as the starting point for elaborate accounts concerning the Orient, its people, customs, "mind," destiny, and so on.... The phenomenon of Orientalism as I study it here deals principally, not with a correspondence between Orientalism and Orient, but with the internal consistency of Orientalism and its ideas about the Orient.. despite or beyond any correspondence, or lack thereof, with a "real" Orient." (Said, 1978)
Reviewing the history of the British colonization of India can demonstrate a good example of the way Orientalism was refined by the imperialistic nationalism. In the early stages the Indian culture was seen, as an equal with the outsiders but after a few years was later considered inferior to British rule after 1800. The Orient has been a major wellspring that has helped in defining the west. Orientalism should therefore convey or represent a positive part of western history. "The differences between the Orientalist and Westernizer alternatives to modernity may seem small. One critic has gone so far as to argue that Orientalism was not so much alternative to as it was an alternative of Westernization. The only difference here between Anglicists and Orientalists is that the Anglicists went farther than the Orientalists in importing Western values wholesale and were less sympathetic to Oriental culture and to the need of integrating the new values smoothly into the old fabric." (Kopf, 1969)
What actually is Orientalism? "Orientalism, is a political vision of reality whose structure promoted the difference between the familiar (Europe, the West, 'us') and the strange (the orient, the East, 'them'). (1) As the "strong" and the "familiar" entity, the West finds it automatic and, at times, imperative that "the Oriental is contained and represented by dominating frameworks." (2) The frameworks of containment and representation take various forms and apply different techniques. Among the major frameworks are historical presentations and re-presentations. (3) According to this logic, the Orientalist historiography of Eastern civilizations expresses an imperial desire: to subject the "other" and the "other's" past to the imperial will, and to come out with a new "world history" in which the Western power becomes the historical necessity in a "new world order." (Said, 1978)
Today, Orientalism is an attempt to control and exploit the East. Orientalism can be considered a type of thinking based upon the Orient and the Occident. Many writers accept the distinctions of east and west and from those distinctions concoct an elaborate account of the people and customs of the Orient. "Unsophisticated generalizations about the outer world as seen from the West were in fact also the major component of the Orientalism so severely criticized in recent years. Overtly simplified messages about Asia's democratic deficiencies are contained in everyday language and common prejudices and reflected in popular literature and journalism." (Bruun, 2000) And as the west has historically seen the orient as inferior, Orientalism as a philosophy of conquering has spread. The Islamic law nations have become the new Orient.
Is there a justification for Islamic law…[continue]
"Religion And Politics" (2003, May 10) Retrieved October 22, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/religion-and-politics-148243
"Religion And Politics" 10 May 2003. Web.22 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/religion-and-politics-148243>
"Religion And Politics", 10 May 2003, Accessed.22 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/religion-and-politics-148243
Religion and Politics All religions aim to provide a code of life for mankind. Apart from other tenets, this code establishes laws that govern all areas of man's life. Thus the laws established by the religion Islam are termed as Shariah. The term Shariah means all of the Islamic Laws and is derived from four basic sources. These sources are The Holy Quran, Sunnah, Ij'ma (consensus) of the Companions (Sahabah) and
Examples where religion has become intersected with politics are present throughout the entire history, and in more recent years, include the debates on same sex marriages or on abortion. A more specific look at the relationship between politics and religion has revealed at least three points of intersection -- the role of churches, the evolution of human rights and the emergence and impacts of religious conflicts. In terms of the
This means that there must be some correlation between religion and politics. Indeed Keddie (2003) asserts that there is an aversion to the word secular and that most countries that try to embrace this idea are not content. According to Carroll (2003) this inevitable link between religion and politics forces the question of whether or not the world would be better off without religion. The author asserts that misconceptions about
Race factored in creates a shift in the view which can be correctly applied to that which affects voting and as well globalization has created its' own impact on voting choices made by the American individual. BIBLIOGRAPHY Campbell, David E. (2004). Acts of Faith: Churches and Political Engagement. Political Behavior, 26 (2), 155-180. Clawson, Rosalee a. And Clark, John a. (2003). The Attitudinal Structure of African American Women Party Activists: The Impact of
This time period also marked a great deal of expansion for different European nations. This expansion occurred through the conquering of certain territories. Machiavellian Leaders Machiavelli believed that great leaders had to possess certain attributes. He asserted that a "leader needs an analytical attitude without a sense of shame or guilt. Political calculation is required to control, rather than be victimized by events (Deluga, 2001)." In other words, a Machiavellian leader
Even though the lines may be quite bold between democrats and republicans, the BBC found that 65% of Americans believe "churches should not endorse candidates," and 51% agree that "churches should express views on political matters" (Greene 2002-2008, graphics box). IV. Summary/Conclusion The question of whether or not a candidate's personal religious beliefs should be used on the campaign trail is a problematic one, with two equally valid points-of-view. Those who
This of course is easier said than done as currently most ethnic and sub-ethnic groups are simply seeking recognition and voice of their own identity, one that was subverted by the British colonial dictates of an organized and orderly nation, able to be easily run from just a few regional seats. Higazi notes that in central Nigeria another example of an age old social and political tradition previously serving to