Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Like the nature vs. nurture debate, the most likely answer to this question is most likely a combination of both conclusions. "If guns disappeared tomorrow, violence would surely continue. But it would probably be less devastating, especially for such at-risk groups as the young and African-Americans" (Spitz 64).
Conclusion Rossi and James D. Wright. Under the Gun: Weapons, Crime, and Violence in America. New York: Aldine Publishing, 1983.
The research showed that in spite of gun control opponents' claims that "guns don't kill people, people kill people," the fact remains the in American households with guns, the incidence of homicide and suicide far exceeded those without guns. Notwithstanding the guarantees set forth in the Second Amendment, the time has clearly come for a reexamination of just what a "well-regulated militia" is, and who should be regarded as being a part of it for the purposes of gun ownership in the United States.
Works Cited
Bailey,.
Bogus, Carl T. (2001). What Does the Second Amendment Restrict? A Collective Rights Analysis. Constitutional Commentary, 18(3):485.
Kopel, David B.
The Samurai, the Mountie, and the Cowboy: Should America Adopt the Gun Controls of other Democracies? Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1992.
LaFollette. Hugh. (2000). Gun Control, Ethics, 110, 266 in Stell 2001:31.
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.
Sanford, Levinson. (1989). The Embarrassing Second Amendment, Yale Law Journal, 99, 637.
Spitzer, Roberst J. The Politics of Gun Control. New York: Chatham House Publishers, 1998.
Stell, Lance K. (2001). Gun Control and the Regulation of Fundamental Rights. Criminal Justice Ethics, 20(1):28.
Utter, Glenn H. Encyclopedia of Gun Control and Gun Rights. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press, 2000.
Vizzard, William J. (1995). The Impact of Agenda Conflict on Policy Formulation and Implementation: The Case of…
Works Cited
Bailey,.
Bogus, Carl T. (2001). What Does the Second Amendment Restrict? A Collective Rights Analysis. Constitutional Commentary, 18(3):485.
Daly, Kathleen, Peter H. Rossi and James D. Wright. Under the Gun: Weapons, Crime, and Violence in America. New York: Aldine Publishing, 1983.
Kopel, David B.
Guns Control Gun control Gun control is a law or policy passed with the aim of limiting the possession and use of guns or firearms by private citizens. Gun and firearm control have been a subject of extensive debate in the U.S. The establishment of a balance between the personal rights of individuals to own and the government's commitment to maintain law and order has proved a tricky affair. The ownership of
Gun ownership is constitutionally protected in the United States, embedded in the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which reads, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed," (Bill of Rights, 1789). The interpretation of this constitutional right has become the topic of heated debate in the United States. As the Library
Persuasion is the cornerstone of advertising. Using the classic rhetorical devices of pathos, ethos, and logos, advertisers create emotionally powerful campaigns designed to change the ways consumers—or voters—think, act, and feel. The goal of advertising is ultimately behavioral change. With public service announcements like those for gun control, advertisers use the same principles used to market goods and services. As with commercial product advertising, public service announcements are created to
Proposition Non-Sense Crime Drugs: A Policy Guide Proposition #24: Attempts to ban the possession of handguns, or certain kinds of guns, are not a viable option for reducing crime. According to sociologist Samuel Walker: "People intent upon committing a crime are particularly motivated to obtain a gun. In short, it is not very efficient or sensible to try to control ownership of guns by the public at large when the real problem is
The Second Amendment to the Constitution states, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed,” (United States Constitution). Because few contemporary gun owners would describe themselves as being part of a “well regulated militia,” the relevance of the Second Amendment becomes increasingly spurious. Mass shootings, firearm accidents, and other gun-related deaths
People can no longer decide on their selves, and there the rulers of the country must intervene. The measures proposed will have as finality the reduction in violent attacks, and more tranquil life in American cities and ghettos. The feasibility of the legislative intention is also demonstrated with logical arguments, which would deter the behavior of individuals with an aversion to violence. The violence is a sign of weakness, both