Sociology Theorist From What I Essay

PAGES
3
WORDS
1072
Cite
Related Topics:

The third reason that I chose Marx is the apparently cyclical nature of change and restriction. The last century has seen some tremendous social changes. The 1960s Civil Rights Movement and the Sexual Revolution changed the face of modern America. However, there seems to have been a pendulum swing back to more restrictive behavior. It is now considered more appropriate to be openly sexist and racist than it was in the 1980s. In fact, propaganda has promoted the idea of the white, middle-class, Christian male as being the target of discrimination, even though this group still maintains almost all of the status-related privilege that it had prior to either of those movements, still getting more opportunities and greater benefits, as a group, than racial minorities, women, or religious minorities. One example of this is a chain e-mail I received that said something along the lines of "Dear God, why is there violence in schools?" God's reply was, "Don't ask me, I'm not allowed in schools." Emails like this perpetuate the myth that there has been an attack on religious freedom, despite the fact that there has never been any federal judgment outlawing any type of individual prayer in schools; on the contrary, judgments have prohibited group prayer that would infringe upon religious freedom. The attitude seems to be that any behavior that inhibits the right of the majority group to set standards and mores for the entire society is somehow discrimination. This pendulum swing seems to occur after ever civil rights advance.

...

Moreover, I think there is an important distinction between social conflict theory and communism, which many people ignore because Marx openly linked social conflict to capitalism. "Capitalism's dirty secret is that it is not a realm of harmony and mutual benefit but a system in which one class systematically extracts profit from another. How could this fail to be unjust? Yet it is notable that Marx never concludes this, and in Capital he goes as far as to say that such exchange is 'by no means an injustice'" (Wolff, 2010). This is a very interesting perspective because Marx the scholar has oftentimes been confused with Marx with political activist. "Many of his expectations about the future course of the revolutionary movement have, so far, failed to materialize. However, his stress on the economic factor in society and his analysis of the class structure in class conflict has had an enormous influence on history, sociology, and study of human culture" (Kreis, 2008).

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Kreis, S. (2008). Karl Marx, 1818-1883. Retrieved March 2, 2012 from the History Guide

website: http://www.historyguide.org/intellect/marx.html

Vissing, Y. (2011). An introduction to sociology: Ashford University discovery series. San Diego: Bridgepoint Education, Inc.

Wolff, J. (2010). Karl Marx. Retrieved March 2, 2012 from the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy website: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/marx/


Cite this Document:

"Sociology Theorist From What I" (2012, March 02) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/sociology-theorist-from-what-i-54711

"Sociology Theorist From What I" 02 March 2012. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/sociology-theorist-from-what-i-54711>

"Sociology Theorist From What I", 02 March 2012, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/sociology-theorist-from-what-i-54711

Related Documents

The economy is society's base structure. This does not mean, however, that everything that occurs in history stems from the economy. Finally, the "materialism" of "historical materialism" is rooted in the idea that the capitalist mode of production is largely contingent on the behavior of participants in the market economy. To sum up, historical materialism is based on a series of principles. The first of these is how humans interact

Sociology: Changing Societies in a Diverse World (Fourth Edition) George J. Bryjak & Michael P. Soroka Chapter One Summary of Key Concepts Sociology is the field of study which seeks to "describe, explain, and predict human social patterns" from a scientific perspective. And though Sociology is part of the social sciences (such as psychology and anthropology), it is quite set apart from the other disciplines in social science; that is because it emphasizes

Theorist: Emile Durkheim Emile Durkheim was a significant contributor to the field of Sociology. In fact, he is considered by many to be the father of Sociology. Durkheim was a proponent of functionalism in that he believed that the individual was not as important as the social structure in determining behavior. Further, functionalists believe that Sociology is a science (positivism) and that society is built "around a value consensus and social

11). Perhaps the most major and identifiable sociological theorist is Emile Durkheim. He literally helped formulate the ideas and theories of modern sociology, and many of the criminal justice theories are based on his ideas. Durkheim developed many of the modern theories of criminality, such as cultural disintegration, which can lead to an individual's gradual disassociation from society, with no bonds or commitments to a society that is dissolving around

Sociology: Deviant Behavior 'Instead of Fighting Deviance, Americans Just Get Used to It" an Analysis According to the article "Instead of Fighting Deviance, Americans Just Get Used to It" Richard Starr suggests that deviance has become so much the norm that people in America are becoming desensitized to it. Starr begins with a re-cap of two news stories which tell of injuries to children wounded by gunfire and another of police breaking

And as we have gained greater scientific, medical, technological and ideological diffusiveness, theorists from every discipline concerning human matters have required their own lens for examination. For instance, the text by Conrad & Gabe (1999) focuses the whole of its discussion on the relationship between social systems and our ever-growing body of knowledge on systems specific to the physical makeup of the human being. Indeed, the authors provide an