Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Special Education Budget Analysis
Special education directors/leaders must sufficiently understand the budgeting process in order to be able to explain why specific numbers have been entered in a budget. To gain some additional understanding in this area, this paper reviews the relevant literature to examine specific line items to determine the theories, legislations, and/or laws that require special educational directors/leaders to spend a certain amount of money. A discussion concerning the discussing the research-based reasoning behind selected line items of a school district budget is followed by an evaluation of those line items that are not aligned with research-based reasoning. Finally, a discussion concerning what can be done to align the items with research and legislation that meets the federal mandates for fiscal management is followed by a summary of the research and important findings concerning the special education budget process in the conclusion.
Review and Analysis
A summary of legislation, laws, and research that covers the budgeting process
A seemingly bewildering array of federal and state laws have been enacted in recent years in an effort to ensure that special educational students are provided with the same educational opportunities as their nondisabled counterparts (DeNisco, 2015). The first such substantive initiative was the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 which was subsequently amended and expanded into the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act or IDEA (Beatty, 2013). In sum, "The central tenet of the IDEA mandates a free appropriate public education (FAPE) for students with disabilities" (Beatty, 2013, p. 530). Pursuant to the IDEA, school districts have a number of responsibilities with respect to the rights of special education learners as well as their parents, including most especially the provision of an individualized education program (or IEP) and opportunities for ensuring optimal classroom placement (Beatty, 2013).
Likewise, the U.S. Department of Education administers two federal laws, Title II of the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 (formerly known as the Higher...
The programs implemented by the U.S. Department of Education are intended to ensure that local and state education agencies provide transparent, accurate, valid, and reliable information concerning their special educational resources, including the number of highly qualified teachers that are employed for budget planning purposes (Steinbecher & McKeown, 2013). Likewise, both No Child Left Behind and IDEA regulations mandate full certification in special education by all special education teachers (Steinbecher & McKeown, 2013).
A resource cost model approach can be used to estimate the monetary costs of a special educational program for budgeting purposes based on its constituent components, including district-level expenses for the following:
Program coordinators or secretaries,
Curriculum development,
Curricular coaches, and,
Professional development planning and evaluation (Augustine & McCombs, 2013, p. 38).
At the school-level, expenses can include the following:
Site managers,
Teachers,
Enrichment providers,
Security guards,
Administrative staff,
Benefits,
Classroom materials,
Field trips,
Student bus transportation, and,
Food (Augustine & McCombs, 2013, p. 38).
Likewise, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) authorizes federal funds pursuant to Part B, Section 611, to support the provision of special education instructional and associated services (Davis, 2016). Such Title VI-allocations are known as "pass through" funds that are provided directly to local education agencies (Davis, 2016). In general, if an initiative includes one or more of the following strategies, schools can include Title VI-B funds as part of the funding sources:
Special education and related services, and supplementary aids and services, provided in a regular class or other education-related setting to a child with a…
References
Allowable and unallowable expenses. (2016). sNew York Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.p12.nysed.gov/accountability/consolidatedappupdate/allowunallowable / expensesiii.html.
Augustine, C. H. & McCombs, J. S. (2013). Getting to work on summer learning: Recommended practices for success. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
Beatty, M. L. (2013, Spring). Not a bad idea: The increasing need to clarify free appropriate public education provisions under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Suffolk University Law Review, 46(2), 529-533.
Davis, B. (2016). Special Education Programs, Title VI-B Funds. Arkansas Department of Education. Retrieved from http://arkedu.state.ar.us/commemos/static/fy0405/2180.html.
Title I. (2016). U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs / titleiparta/index.html.
More importantly, our appreciative and participatory stance with our co-researchers has allowed us to witness and learn about the cutting edge of leadership work in such a way that is and feels qualitatively different from other research traditions we have used in the past, because it is built on valuing. Even though it is challenging at times (Ospina et al. 2002), our inquiry space is enhanced by our collaboration
Budget Analysis for the City of Lakeland: Executive Summary In order to understand how a new performance-based budgeting process could be utilized by the City of Lakeland, it is essentially to conduct a review of the City's Annual Budget, with a detailed description of how the budgeting process works from beginning to end. Lakeland's budgeting process is divided up into parts, with each part being designated a specific amount of time (in
Schools are pressed in terms of their funding, and cannot always provide as much individualized education as is necessary to help students in the classroom. The results of this study support the notion that preschool intervention can be extremely valuable for helping children with autism, even before the children enter kindergarten. Unfortunately, early intervention programs are struggling to find financial support even more so than standard public schools. Furthermore, children
country's public schools are experiencing dwindling state education budgets and increased unfunded mandates from the federal government, the search for optimal approaches to providing high quality educational services for students with learning disabilities has assumed new importance and relevance. In an attempt to satisfy the mandates of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, a growing number of special educators agree that full inclusion is the optimal approach
Special Education Since the introduction of PL-142 the Special education system has received both praise and criticism. Special Education Programs are an essential component to our educational system. The current special education system has aided many people but improvements are desperately needed as rates of enrollment increase and the number of special education teachers' decrease. The growth in the number of special education students is the topic of conversation among
Inclusion Special education as a concept is historically shrouded in controversy. (Seligmann, 2001, p. 1) Additionally the demand for special education funding and implementation has only increased as the number of students recognized as needing special services has continued to grow exponentially within the past forty years. (Macht, 1998, p. 1) The cultural awareness of the challenges and concerns of developmentally delayed students has also increased exponentially since the time when