Family Discrimination Laws States Like Connecticut, New Essay

Family Discrimination Laws States like Connecticut, New Jersey, and Alaska are taking the lead when it comes to passing laws protecting employees from discrimination based on family responsibility. These anti-family responsibilities discrimination (FRD) laws are designed to protect workers, but whether they are a good idea is a matter of opinion. There are concerns that these laws may be abused, and that employers may end up bearing the brunt of missed days and dissatisfied customers because employees are missing too much work time to be with their families (Pynes, 2013). Personally, I do support the idea of anti-family responsibilities discrimination laws. I think that work is very important, but there should be a good work-life balance. Most people do not have that anymore, because they know they will likely risk being fired if they want or need to miss any work time to spend with their family. People should not have to choose between their job and their family. The two do not need to be mutually exclusive, but more employers appear to be moving...

...

Workers who never get to spend any time with their family and fear being fired if they take a day off for a family medical issue or an important life event are not as productive, overall (Reeves, 2006). These workers can feel drained, unhappy, exhausted, and like they really do not have any personal or human value to their employer (Pynes, 2013). They become just another number at that point, which is incredibly unhealthy and can lead to burnout, worker fatigue, and problems with the quality of their work. At the same time, their family life is suffering because they are stressed out from work and do not get enough time to relax and enjoy the company of loved ones.
Further legislation should cover everyone, and not just state employees. While one can see why state employees would be…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Pynes, J.E.(2013). Human resources management for public and nonprofit organizations: A strategic approach (4th ed.). CA: Jossey-Bass.

Reeves, T.Z. (2006) Cases in public human resource management. NY: Thomson/Wadsworth.


Cite this Document:

"Family Discrimination Laws States Like Connecticut New" (2014, February 17) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/family-discrimination-laws-states-like-connecticut-182985

"Family Discrimination Laws States Like Connecticut New" 17 February 2014. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/family-discrimination-laws-states-like-connecticut-182985>

"Family Discrimination Laws States Like Connecticut New", 17 February 2014, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/family-discrimination-laws-states-like-connecticut-182985

Related Documents

Though the employee's husband did spend nearly four weeks being involved in the healing ministry, "nearly half of the trip was spent not in faith healing, but visiting friends, family, and local churches" (FEPG). The bottom line is that the FMLA won't permit employees to take leave when it is a vacation with a "seriously ill spouse" -- even if caring for the spouse is an "incidental consequence" of bringing

The way that this relates to the work place, is that any kind of slight variation in the quota system can open the flood gates for these kinds of suits to occur. Then, when the court does not provide consistency in their rulings it creates even more confusion. When you look beyond the quota system, it is clear that this basic principal, of taking something away from one group and

Not all people who own guns are criminals nor will they end up using their gun, but it does feel better to know that in a worst case scenario situation, one will be able to fight back on even grounds. Gun regulation is not about banning guns, but about controlling who has access to them. As proposed by the President, background checks are essential when it comes to being able

One hypothesis is that many African-Americans yielded to the intimidation of the time and simply did not want to risk their safety and the safety of their families. 6. Poll Taxes A poll tax is a tax of a fixed amount charged each person to register to vote. (Webster's New World Law Dictionary.) as discussed previously, poll taxes were outlawed by the Twenty First Amendment. The practical effect of poll taxes

..In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word 'marriage' means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word 'spouse' refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or wife." (Smith, 2004; p.5) Smith relates that a

Gay Foster Children
PAGES 10 WORDS 2982

homeless and runaway young people is viewed by many authorities as a human rights condition that grows out of poverty and victimization, often right in their family settings, and later, in the street (Farrow 1992) where they are further exposed to violence and other forms of dysfunction.. The International Perspective on the Health Needs of Homeless Youth uses the terms "street children" to refer to those below 18 years old