How the attachment theory accounts for differences in the development of social relationships in aging adults?
The attachment theory is one of the common theories in the specification of child development and growth in the world. Indeed, several influencing factors are concerned with the generation and establishment of the relationship that exists between parents and their children in the society. According to psychological understandings and studies in the world, there is a common feature of child growth and development that can be developed within the parameters of assumption and specification. For instance, it becomes very possible to have children growing and developing within the parameters and precepts set by their parents or caregivers. The attitudes and treatments from the caregiver appear to have innate influence on the general growth and development of the child (Sigelman & Rider, 2011).
According to the growth and development of the attachment theory, children are part of the regenerative entities in the human society. This is also applicable in the animal world. In a study involving monkeys, it is evident that all living creatures exhibit tenderness to the young. Evidently, it is becomes possible to have elements of concern that are directed at influencing the general growth and development of a child. Children have a tendency to copy from their caregivers. This is also a trend in the general growth and development of the child to the stages of adulthood.
The development of aging relationships in aging people has been explored by the application of the attachment theory in the world. Aging people are part of the categories of people that appear to be in special need. The needs of the children are related and common within the performances and precepts of the aging people. Adults have a common scale of measurement that appears to be at the forefront in depicting the strength of influence and mechanistic performances in the society. According to the studies related to the attachment theory in the world, there is a possibility of influencing positive contribution from the related terms and conditions in the society. It is possible to have adults behaving and being taken care like the young and developing children. Evidently, it is possible to influence growth and development within the parameters of development in the society (George & West, 2012).
What differentiates the way in which individuals conduct social relationships?
People are social beings in nature. They are bound within the need to be specified and put in different societies. No person or animal can survive alone within a given society. Therefore, there is much reputation of dwelling within a social stratum in the society. The society exists as a body that helps to host differing avenues of social stratifications. The social nature of the people appears to push them to urge for change and recognition of the available avenues of growth and development in the society. There are all chances of dwelling within a specified social stratum in the society. Therefore, the social nature of the individuals in adulthood appears to push them to exhibit avenues of relaying social differences in the society (Holland, 2004).
There are specified social groupings that make a difference between different entities or people in the society. Evidently, there are defined approaches different from one another but relevant to the social attributes of the people. People have or come from different social classes. This makes them a depiction of the different characteristics of the social setups where they live. In most cases, it becomes hard to find a scenario where all the available avenues of management and control of the attachment theory are within the different social differentials in the society. Therefore, people will behave according to a society or social exemplification that has been part of their lives. This has occurred to children where the specified characteristics and teachings of the caregiver later become the attributes of the general trends of child growth and development in the society.
The social groups have different methodologies of giving their teachings in the society. As part of relaying the immediate teachings and avenues of growth and development within these teachings, such people will supposedly assure their part of life to be within these teachings. The diversification of these teachings makes them employ differing avenues of relaying their social characteristic and complications in the society. No common avenue through which people can exemplify the different trends of performances in the society exists.
The teachings obtained from the different social groups are part of the mechanism differences in their social relationships. This is what makes the innate difference between the different parameters of control and the general avenues of developing a good platform for maintaining the traditional teachings within a social group. There is every possibility of dwelling within a good platform that assures people of their innate characteristics and future trends in behavior. For instance, the attachment theory advocates for a common avenue of relaying the common characteristics that are accrued from the perception of the parents or adults in accordance to the specified avenues of teachings in the different social groups. The social groups are part of the challenging statements that offer a vivid state of managing the existing trends of management in the society.
Individuals try to be unique in the society as inspired by the different teachings within it. The different social groupings are characterized by different teachings and specifications that are driven to be part of the social trends on the society. These people are directed at influencing their general lives through the daily practices and activities of common concern. It does not take longer than usual to have the attachment theory dwell on reflecting the difference and similarities between the children and the teachings that they acquire from their caregivers. This is also common when the relation between adults and the teachings of the social are reflected in the final stages of life in the society.
Why one person behaves differently to another
According to the common trends and conclusions made by the attachment theory, there are different scales or parameters from which people can be perceived to be very different in the society. The common scales of operation are directed at influencing positive attributes towards the normalized avenues of influencing change in the society. In order to be a full force in the society, these changes are treated with the utmost respect between different members in the society.
The different social settings exist within a given avenue of competition in the world. This trend influences a positive scale of competition with the different parameters of change being seen within the social characteristics. Many attributes of change and recognition are communized within the social trends of living. Different people exist while influencing their own attributes as dictated by the society they hail. In many occasions, many of these people will try to foster the strength and availability of their own avenues of success without having to consider those of others in the society. In many situations, it becomes hard to find different sense trying to influence the success within a single avenue of performance in the market. In the end, people appear to be different in their avenues of exercising change and other attributes of the society in their daily activities (Whitbourne et al., 2011).
At old age, it becomes difficult to integrate different social teachings and behaviors as projected by the proposers of the attachment theory. According to the attachment theory, there are certain attributes that become hard to be recognized and changed the moment many people have been influenced to exist within a given trend of performance in the society. These attributes appear to strike certain levels of differences when it comes to management of the available avenues of growth and development in the society. Attributes among the old people dictate the immediate differentiation between two and many cultures in the society. For instance, the change of behavior is not a common happening that influences positive attributes among the old in the society.
The common avenue of performance and behavior among the old is directed at influencing positive change and attribution in the society. In most cases, it becomes hard for the social stratifications to be directed at influencing positive change and attribution in the society. There is no possible way of having certain group of people dominate the others in the society. There is a personal stake in maintaining the existing trends of performance within certain or wholesome avenues of social establishment in many societies. In order to be part of the major changes and attributes in the society, it pays a lot to reflect in the personalized avenues of personal growth and development in the society. Therefore, the social trends that have been established enable people to subdue to their innate social stratifications and classes in the world.
Is it fair to suggest that development through childhood plays a role in this?
The general growth and development of a child is subject…