U S Banking/Financial Sector Legislation in Essay

Download this Essay in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Essay:

190). The Act also helped to create a "too-big-to-fail" mindset (Walter, 2004) that would have profound implications during the economic downturn of 2008 and beyond.

6.

Why did you include this piece of legislation in your list? The Act is described by Sammin (2004) as being "the biggest revision in financial services law since the Great Depression" (p. 653).

Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994

1.

What were the problems/conditions giving rise to the legislation? Rapid consolidations among the nation's banks were creating the potential for diverting needed banking resources from communities (Rose, 1997).

2.

What were the major provisions of the Act? The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (hereinafter "the Act") contained the following major provisions:

A. Bank holding companies that are adequately capitalized and managed can acquire a bank anywhere in the United States one year after this law is enacted. However, no banking firm can acquire another banking firm in a different state if the resulting institution controls at least 30% of the insured deposits held in the state involved (though a state may waive or alter this limitation if it wishes) or as much as 10% of nationwide insured deposits. The states can protect new banks from acquisition by out-of-state firms for up to five years.

B. Interstate bank holding companies that are adequately capitalized and managed may consolidate their affiliated banks acquired across state lines into branch offices via merger unless the states act to outlaw interstate branching activity. An individual state may enact laws permitting interstate branching prior to June 1, 1997, and a host state that contains a branch office of an out-of-state bank can examine and take enforcement action against that branch office.

C. If a state elects to prohibit interstate branching, banks headquartered in that state may not engage in interstate mergers.

D. For those states involved in the interstate banking system, their regulatory agencies will be permitted to set up cooperative agreements to supervise multistate depository institutions.

E. Federal banking agencies must consult with community organizations before closing a branch office owned by an interstate banking company if the branch is located in a low- or moderate-income area.

F. A federally insured bank can branch de novo into a state where it has no existing office but only if state law expressly permits de novo entry via branching. States can tax branches of out-of-state banks as if they were full-service banks operating in that state (Rose, 1997, p. 43).

3.

What were the significant effects or outcomes arising form the legislation? Following the passage of the Act, well-capitalized and well-managed bank holding companies were permitted to acquire banks in any state in the country (Rose, 1997). According to Walter (2004), one of the most significant effects of the Act was to increase merger premiums by approximately 35% as a result of the deregulation that resulted from the enactment of the Act because it eliminated geographic restrictions for bank operations in the U.S. (Walter, 2004).

4.

Did the legislation fix the problem or condition that it was intended to fix? As a result of deregulation, in the number of banks in the U.S. has been reduced by half due to consolidation, and banking markets have become more competitive in the years following the passage of the Act (Feinberg & Reynolds, 2010).

5.

Were there any significant unintended consequences of the Act? According to Rose, the Act introduced the potential for bank holding company acquisition nationwide by overriding state laws that only allowed the entry of banking companies if they were headquartered in certain states or regions of the nation (Rose, 1997).

6.

Why did you include this piece of legislation in your list? Like the other two pieces of legislation, the Act was widely regarded as one of the most important pieces of financial services and banking industry regulation in recent years. For example, Feinberg and Reynolds suggest that, "The 1994 Riegle-Neal Act ushered forth a new era in banking deregulation" (2010, p. 624).

Conclusion

The research showed that the past 50 years have witnessed the passage of a number of laws that have had an enormous impact on the banking and financial sector history in the U.S., with three of the most important being the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999 and the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994. The research also found widespread agreement among analysts that these laws were among the most important in the nation's history with profound implications for the banking and financial services industries that will continue into the foreseeable future.

References

Alexander, K., Dhumale, R. & Eatwell, J. (2006). Global governance of financial systems: The international regulation of systemic risk. New York: Oxford University Press.

Coustan, H., Leinicke, L.M., Rexroad, W.M. & Ostrosky, J.A. (2004). Sarbanes-Oxley: What it means to the marketplace; from support to apprehension, accounting professionals express their thoughts. Journal of Accountancy, 197(2), 43-44.

Feinberg, R.M. & Reynolds, K.M. (2010). An examination of entry and competitive performance in rural banking markets. Southern Economic Journal, 76(3), 624-625.

Gup, B.E. (2003). The future of banking. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

-. (2000). The new financial architecture: Banking regulation in the 21st century. Westport,

CT: Quorum Books.

Mccarthy, E. (2004). Tips for the Sarbanes-Oxley learning curve: The Act has brought more complexity to firm management; Here's some broad-based help. Journal of Accountancy,

197(6), 36-37.

Moberly, R.E. (2007). Unfulfilled expectations: An empirical analysis of why Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblowers rarely win.…[continue]

Cite This Essay:

"U S Banking Financial Sector Legislation In" (2010, December 08) Retrieved December 10, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/us-banking-financial-sector-legislation-11646

"U S Banking Financial Sector Legislation In" 08 December 2010. Web.10 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/us-banking-financial-sector-legislation-11646>

"U S Banking Financial Sector Legislation In", 08 December 2010, Accessed.10 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/us-banking-financial-sector-legislation-11646

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • U S Macroeconomy Forecast GDP 2010 2011

    The U.S. economy is currently downshifting. Real GDP appears to be growing nearly 2% annualized -- at most -- in the current quarter. This rate is down from 3% during the first half of 2010 (before impending downward revisions), and 4% during the second half of 2009. Weakening support from the monetary and fiscal stimulus, the fading inventory rotation in manufacturing, and the consequences from Europe's debt crisis are an

  • Banking Regulation Captain You Do See

    Banking Regulation Captain -- You Do See That Blinking Light, Don't You? An apocryphal story about an unnamed navy captain goes like this. The ship in question is sailing at a not insignificant clip on a very overcast night close to shore in preparation for docking. A number of sailors who are above deck see a blinking light in the distance that clearly -- to them -- appears to be a lighthouse.

  • Robert Reich Formal U S Secretary

    Thirdly, health care costs were rising. "The number of people without any health insurance climbed to 15.9% in 2005 from 14.2% in 2000, and the share of people with employer-provided health insurance dropped to 59.5% from 63.6% over the same period, according to the Census Bureau data released in 2006. The number of uninsured Americans is now the highest since 1998" (Middle Class in Turmoil). Finally, the debts were rapidly increasing.

  • 5th Fleet in Bahrain and the U S

    5TH FLEET IN BAHRAIN AND THE U.S. AND EU OIL EMBARGO IN IRAN ROLE OF THE U.S. 5TH FLEET IN BAHRAIN AND THE U.S. AND EU OIL EMBARGO IN IRAN Role of the U.S. 5th fleet" in Bahrain Role of the U.S. 5th fleet" in Bahrain foreign aid to Bahrain, where the U.S. Fifth Fleet is centered, constitutes directly to the U.S. Government's aims to maintain safety in the Persian Gulf. Bahrain is the

  • Offshore Tax Havens by U S

    The other side of this is that the companies have to spend finances in areas of language training or job training when they outsource. However, over the years, many U.S.-based companies haven't been discouraged by these additional costs because the overall costs of outsourcing with the job training session and language teaching and outplacement requirements are still far less when compared to the costs that they would have to endure

  • Budget Cycle of the U S

    S. Government to make future or immediate monetary outlays. In the second subcomponent, the reporting and outlay phase lasts for the duration until the funds are canceled or until the funds are totally disbursed. One should note that these cancellations are in no way connected with cancellations that are connected with budget reductions. These are a separate congressional activity (ibid). Sometimes spending adjustments are needed during the fiscal year. They may

  • Financial Reform in 2009 A

    Bank of America and Merrill Lynch would have to be separated and Goldman Sachs could no longer be a bank holding company. "Commercial banks would take deposits, manage the nation's payments system, make standard loans and even trade securities for their customers -- just not for themselves. The government, in return, would rescue banks that fail. On the other side of the wall, investment houses would be free to


Read Full Essay
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved