Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Suffrage
Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Amelia Bloomer were all instrumental in shifting the status of women in American society. Their writings reveal the personalities, assumptions, and values of the authors. Each of these women took incredible personal risks by challenging the underlying assumptions in the society that women were not valid, valuable members of society. The place of women in American society prior to suffrage was no better than domestic servitude. Anthony forever aligns herself with the likes of Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr., by using the technique civil disobedience to achieve social justice. Each of these women recognized the connection between slavery of African-Americans and slavery of women. They each fought for abolition as well as suffrage, and therefore understood that women's rights were human rights.
When Anthony, Stanton, and Bloomer fought for equality, they did so in a time when more than fifty percent of the population was denied civil rights. They each saw clearly the problem with not upholding the values of the Constitution, as each of these activists draw from American history to prove their point. Anthony, for example, spoke on behalf of freedom and liberty when she stated, "I not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizen's rights, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by the National Constitution, beyond the power of any state to deny," ("On Women's Right to Vote," 1872). Bloomer (1895) expressed similar sentiments. As with Anthony, Bloomer stated that it is impossible...
"No one who claims to be a republican or lover of freedom at heart can dispute these positions. They are in substance the principles promulgated in the Declaration of Independence, and they form the common basis upon which our national and state governments rest," (Bloomer, 1895). Likewise, Stanton pointed out that the core values of American politics and society were being thwarted by sexism. When Stanton (1898) called for " Liberty to all; national protection for every citizen under our flag; universal suffrage, and universal amnesty," she spoke on behalf of all the oppressed citizens of the United States -- as she was also an abolitionist. Anthony, Stanton, and Bloomer understood that civil disobedience was necessary in order to create a more perfect union.
Based on their ability to organize and coordinate meaningful political action, Anthony, Stanton, and Bloomer understood the American political process even while they were systematically and formally excluded from it. It was not enough for Anthony to disobey the law by voting, for example. If she only did that, she might not make a strong enough statement that would lead to massive and meaningful social and political change. Anthony understood that she had to garner support for her position by organizing large groups of people, both men and women. She needed to transform the values and norms of society. Likewise, Bloomer's work shows a desire to transform social norms as well as the political process. Bloomer's writing…
Similar protests launched in the United Kingdom around the same time period. And the results were altogether similar as well. In 1918, the British Parliament passed the Eligibility of Women Act, which allowed women to be elected into the Parliament. In 1928, the Representation of the People Act granted women across the nation voting rights as equal to those as of the men. This was a major milestone achieved by
Women's History Throughout the history of Western civilization, cultural beliefs allowed women only limited roles in society, such as mothers and wives, and it was believed that women were intellectually inferior to men (Women's pp). Women shared the same disadvantages with the majority of working class men, since many social, economic, and political rights were restricted to the wealthy elite (Women's pp). During the late eighteenth century, political theorists and philosophers
Women Activists Dilemma to support or Oppose the 15th Amendment as evidenced by the split in the Women’s suffrage Movement Introduction After the Civil war, three amendments were passed which massively transformed the women’s rights movement. These were the thirteenth, fourteenth and fifteenth amendments. The thirteenth amendment approved in the year 1865 declared slavery illegal (Parker, 1849). Thus, all the women who were previously enslaved became free and acquired protection by human
U.S. AFTER 1865 DYNAMICS OF GENDER POLITICS IN THE 1910S AND 1920S In the period during World War 1, the place of the women was in chemical plants, steel foundries, and munitions factories as a way of serving their country. After the creation of the Army Corps of Nurses, many women went abroad as nurses, and this gave them strong moral arguments for their voting rights. Women tactics and immoral way of
Women's Rights In Saudi Arabia Despite recent media attention stemming from Saudi Arabia's recent legislative decision to allow women the right to vote and run in the 2015 municipal elections, the truth remains that Saudi Arabian women remain some of the most tightly-controlled and oppressed populations in the world in terms of legislation and cultural practices -- both of which prohibit them from having the same rights as men. In viewing
The authors further point out that at the time, NWSA did not accept male membership as its focus was firmly trained on securing the voting rights of women nationwide. As their push for the enfranchisement of women at the federal level became more and more untenable, NWSA shifted its focus to individual states. In so doing, it planned to create a ripple effect that could ease the attainment of