Abilene Paradox: Reflection of Communication Dysfunction
The Abilene Paradox provides a framework for understanding communication dysfunction within an organization or group of individuals. The parable relates the tale of individuals who agree to do something that independently no one wants to do. The end result is frustration, anger and disillusionment. The Abilene Paradox is nothing more than a parable, derived from true to live experiences that attempt to explain how individuals reach or fail to reach agreement (Deiss, 1999).
There are those that argue the paradox explains how people believe they reach agreement, with "believe" being a matter of interpretation up for analysis (Deiss, 1999). The parable suggests that when everyone simply agrees on an issue to appease others rather than satisfy their own needs, dysfunction occurs. Many use the parable to describe what is often called group...
Also, they may have new but valuable information that members of the core group of decision makers lack. To encourage all workers to feel free to openly speak their mind in public rather than in private (another symptom of the paradox), an organization must make free expression part of its public culture. Routinely soliciting criticism and comments from everyone creates an idea that speaking up is encouraged, rather than discouraged.
305). A person's expected role is the formal role that is defined in a job description and the signals that other members of a work unit send as they teach newcomers how to perform their jobs. An individual's expected role, however, may differ from his or her perceived role. A perceived role is the set of activities that an individual believes he or she is expected to perform. The
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now