Acceptable Use Policy Aup Policy Review: Los Case Study

PAGES
3
WORDS
1251
Cite

Acceptable Use Policy AUP Policy Review: Los Angeles Unified School District

With continuously evolving technologies, it is important for organizations to set up standards that helps mitigate potential liability in regards to staff potentially of using or misusing such technologies. It is obvious that an Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) is a very important policy within modern organizations in order to define what acceptable employee behavior when accessing company resources is. AUP's help provide staff the technological resources that they need, while setting clear limits as to what is off-limits. For the purpose of this evaluation, the Los Angeles Unified School District's AUP in regards to its school computers and networking systems will be analyzed and critiqued in order to provide recommendations for future changes.

Organizations that include technology devices within their operations need to have AUP's second-place to make sure that such devices are not abused or misused in a way that would make the organization liable for misconduct. There is no other environment where this becomes more important than the context of our nation's schools. There is a huge drive to improve the technology used within classrooms and school facilities; yet, at the same time there are issues with how such technologies might be a liability for school districts if misused by either staff or students. For the purpose of this analysis, the AUP policy in regards to computer and network facilities will be examined within the Los Angeles Unified School District, which is one of the largest districts in the country. Essentially, the policy states that "teachers, administrators, and other school personnel should ensure district data systems are used in a responsible, efficient, ethical, and legal manner, and that such use be in support of the districts business and education objectives" (Los Angeles Unified School District, 2012, p 1). The AUP helps provide confidentiality, integrity, and availability within...

...

The primary objective of this AUP is to provide teaching and administrative staff with the innovative and technological tools needed to make the classrooms the most effective, well at the same time limiting potential risk by setting out the clear limitations in use of such technologies. Staff members can only use computers on the clock if it is part of their lesson planning or execution. Yet, they're allowed use the computer facilities on their off periods for limited private use. Separate AUP standards help keep kids working on their schoolwork, instead of being distracted by third-party websites, or even potentially risking the entire network through their online activity. Students are restricted to the use of computers only for activities that augment their learning experience. Both students and staff are restricted from breaking any state or federal laws, including the transmitting of pornography or any other scene material through school-based computers, along with any other crimes that carry punishment under the laws. Additionally, the selling or purchasing of illegal items where the unauthorized use of others' e-mail addresses is also forbidden. Using school computers for any sort of financial benefit or gain is also prohibited in LAUSD's AUP policy.
However, even in the most recent adaptations to the AUP policy made in 2012, there still some missing elements to the policy that would help strengthen and increase its overall success in minimizing misuse of school networks and computers. The AUP policy was adopted in May of 2012, yet oddly enough this adaptation did not include anything regarding social media. Social networking and social media has become the latest trend, with both staff and students most likely participating in one way or another. However, the AUP does not directly define how social media can and should be used on school property. According to King (2012), "social media has many benefits: social media postings violate the law or district policies…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

King, Michelle. (2012). Social media policy for employers and associated persons. Los Angeles Unified School District Policy Bulletin. Web. http://www.lausd.net/lausd/offices/Office_of_Communications/BUL-5688.0_SOCIAL_MEDIA_POLICY.pdf

Mitchell, Bradley. (2011). How to create and AUP: Acceptable Use Policy. Computing: Wireless Networking. Web. http://compnetworking.about.com/cs/intranets/ht/ht_createaup.htm

Los Angeles Unified School District. (2012). Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) for district computer and network systems. Los Angeles Unified School District Policy Bulletin. Web. http://askitd.net/departments/iss/security/aup


Cite this Document:

"Acceptable Use Policy Aup Policy Review Los" (2013, May 04) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/acceptable-use-policy-aup-policy-review-88117

"Acceptable Use Policy Aup Policy Review Los" 04 May 2013. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/acceptable-use-policy-aup-policy-review-88117>

"Acceptable Use Policy Aup Policy Review Los", 04 May 2013, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/acceptable-use-policy-aup-policy-review-88117

Related Documents

Liability of Smallness: What it Means and What Can Be Done in Response The historical record contains few examples of the smaller underdog winning out over larger opponents, with examples such as David and Goliath being the exceptions rather than the rule. This paucity of examples is due in large part to the so-called liability of smallness which suggests smaller firms are more vulnerable to competition, a constraint that is especially

Because the $750.00 was given as a donation to the non-profit organization, it will be viewed as an asset. Since the preparation of the tax return was given in exchange for the donation, it is considered a gift and thus not an asset. Next, one must inquire as to whether the firm of Good and Good's liability should be measured at out of pocket cost, at full costs, or at

An appellate court case that found the employer liable for hostile environment sexual harassment is Kunin v. Sears Roebuck & Co. Under this claim, Karen Kunin was sexually harassed by a male employee based upon the abusive and derogatory language that was used. Kunin did not report any abuse to her employer other than to asking if cursing was harassment. The U.S. Court of Appeals found that an employer must

Laying of benefits that accrue to the student before the court further supports the case. In conclusion, solving issues that dent school's safety is successful if it involves the students, school administration, parents and the community at large. This allows for identification of the root causes of the problem that lead to violent behavior and drug abuse. The school should put in place forums that allow students to raise safety

For example, drunk and disorderly behavior might be a minor infraction in the real world, but a student who continually disrupts the community can be asked to leave it, given the risk he or she poses to other students. But colleges must guard against assuming responsibility for student's hurt feelings -- for example, it is conceivable that having overly stringent hate speech standards that could limit the ability of

It is also a cloudy issue as to whether a company can terminate employment if an individual commits and is convicted of a crime while they are in the employment of the company. If such a crime were a low level crime, that could be thought of as a "gateway" crime such as possession of pornography, soliciting prostitution or prowling, but not a crime sufficient to be made public