It is also a cloudy issue as to whether a company can terminate employment if an individual commits and is convicted of a crime while they are in the employment of the company. If such a crime were a low level crime, that could be thought of as a "gateway" crime such as possession of pornography, soliciting prostitution or prowling, but not a crime sufficient to be made public in any way that the company would easily find out there is a sense that the crime would likely not be reported to the employer and therefore would not cause any concern for increased risk to tenants. It is also interesting that is required that owners and managers of apartment complexes must inform tenants of increased risk, if such occurrences, or more serious ones occur in within the complex, but there does not seem to be a precedence for if the crime is committed by a property manager. (Loss Prevention Concepts Ltd. " Apartment Security Management: Consumer Tips" (http://www.lpconline.com/apartments2.html) Another option for the owner is to install a deadbolt that does not have a key mechanism on the outside of the door, which bars entry by anyone, at least for a time. This is not logical for many people as legitimate members of the household then cannot access the house if someone inside has locked the deadbolt, and the owner or his agent cannot enter the property in the event of a legitimate emergency. If such a deadbolt had been applied to this tenants door, there would have been limited ability of the manager to enter her apartment, assuming she had used such a device.
In a Delaware case, Kahn v Jupiter Western et al., a home invader and sexual predator gained entrance to a town house unit by kicking in the door of the apartment. The tenant claimed this easy access was obtained because the deadbolt was improperly installed and there was less than a one inch throw, which is the minimum standard. While this allegation concerning installation deficiency was, in fact, accurate, it proved to be irrelevant because the police photos of the damaged door frame clearly indicated that the deadbolt was not engaged at the time of the forced entry.
In a Michigan case, Neff v Harbor Towne Apartments, an intruder gained entrance to an apartment via a sliding glass door and sexually assaulted a tenant. This plaintiff readily admitted she hadn't used the secondary lock on this door since it was inconvenient and she felt the thumb latch should have been sufficient. In many other cases, plaintiffs have admitted that they did not utilize the deadbolts provided, but claimed they thought that the spring locks or key-in-knob locks should have been sufficient to prevent the entry of intruders, since they had not been advised otherwise. (Loss Prevention Concepts Ltd. " Apartment Security Management: Consumer Tips" (http://www.lpconline.com/apartments2.html)
As can be seen from the reading of both these case briefs the individual committing the crime was not an agent of the owner of the property, and therefore had little connection to liability. The point being made by the article is that secondary locking systems do not work if they are not engaged, nor do they work if the individual has a key to them, either way the individual entered the apartment illegally and should be culpable for damages. One suggestion is that owners and management ...
Regardless of the outcome of this suit, it is likely that ABC will in the future take much more care as to screening employees, possibly as much as they take to screening tenants. In fact it would likely seem odd to even a judge that screening equivalent to tenant screening was not done on an employee, as presumably ABC would have access to such screening at nominal fees. Then again there is the issue of discretion for screening tenant applicants as well, as many companies do only limited tenancy screening, (not including criminal background checks) in a quest to fill vacancies as quickly as possible. Liability will again be determined not on the simple facts of the case study but a more detailed and auspicious investigation into the screening of the employee.
Blakey, G.R., & Roddy, K.P. (1996). Reflections on Reves V. Ernst & Young: Its Meaning and Impact on Substantive, Accessory, Aiding Abetting and Conspiracy Liability under RICO. American Criminal Law Review, 33(5), 1345-1702. Retrieved September 18, 2007, from Questia database: http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5000456701
DNA Diagnostic Testing Services "Background Checks" Retrieved September 18, 2007, at http://www.alphagenetic.org/id16.html
Loss Prevention Concepts Ltd. " Apartment Security Management: Consumer Tips" Retrieved September 18, 2007, at http://www.lpconline.com/apartments2.html www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5002229417
Odom, C. (1995, May). Candid Candidates: What's Behind the Resume?. Security Management, 39, 66+. Retrieved September 18, 2007, from Questia database: http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5002229417 www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5001262359
Washington, L. (1999, June). What it Takes to Be a Landlord. Black Enterprise, 29, 285. Retrieved September 18, 2007, from Questia database: http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5001262359 www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5002198676
Who's Minding the Store?. (1993, December). Security Management, 37, 13. Retrieved September 18, 2007, from Questia database: http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5002198676
Loss Prevention Concepts Ltd. " Apartment Security Management: Consumer Tips" Retrieved September 18, 2007, at http://www.lpconline.com/apartments2.html
Another option for the owner is to install a deadbolt that does not have a key mechanism on the outside of the door, which bars entry by anyone, at least for a time. This is not logical for many people as legitimate members of the household then cannot access the house if someone inside has locked the deadbolt, and the owner or his agent cannot enter the property in the event of a legitimate emergency. If such a deadbolt had been applied to this tenants door, there would have been limited ability of the manager to enter her apartment, assuming she had used such a device.
" Lastly, the court did not offer resolution for the Plaintiff as in summation and appeals it claims that there was not good enough evidence that the accident had been an intentional criminal act and that if security had been provided the incident would not have happened. 2. The foreeseeable legal benefits of the case are twofold, that the venue and all parties in charge of it are not liable for this
Depending on the specific causes and determinations of responsibility, communications initiatives will emphasize the corrective actions and consequences as well as the protocols for ensuring against any possible recurrence (Locker, 2005). If the allegations are not true, those efforts will credit the company's compliance record, commitment to the environment, and express extreme sensitivity and concern for the well-being of the child of the individual making the erroneous allegations. full intention
companies be held liable? The issue of whether firms should be held responsible for losses sustained for external attacks on their AIS (accounting information systems) has recently come into sharp focus. On one hand, if a firm has put in place sufficient security measures, then in that case they shouldn't be held liable for any losses incurred in an external attack on their AIS. On the other hand, if a
Business Limited Liability Corporation and Partnership Paper A limited liability company, normally called an LLC, is a business arrangement that merge the pass-through taxation of a partnership or sole proprietorship with the limited liability of a corporation (Limited Liability Company (LLC) FAQ, 2012). The federal government does not distinguish an LLC as a classification for federal tax purposes. LLC's are well-liked because, comparable to a corporation, owners have limited personal liability for
Tattoo Shoppe Case -- Liability for Wrong Tattoo Questions Presented Is Tattoo Shoppe liable for the wrong tattoo performed by its owner on Lydia's lower back? If yes, how much money is the tattoo parlor liable for and how can such liability be prevented in the future? Short Answer Even though liability for tattoos that go wrong varies across the state, the tattoo artist is primarily liable while the tattoo parlor has only a
Causation: Irrespective of whether or not ABC Apartments satisfied its duty of reasonable care with respect to the safety of its tenants, the harm for which liability is claimed must relate directly to any failure to satisfy that standard. More particularly, to establish liability, the plaintiff must also establish that any negligence of ABC in failing to exercise reasonable care was the proximate cause of the harm that resulted (Freidman 2005). For