ADA When A Reasonable Accommodation Term Paper

PAGES
1
WORDS
413
Cite

The union, however, must be part of the process of determining a reasonable accommodation where the reasonable accommodation would cause a material, substantial or significant change in working conditions" to the unionized employees (Johnson, 2007). However, negotiating reasonable accommodations, "may conflict with the NLRA prohibitions on direct dealing and unilateral changes to terms and conditions of employment," which must be established during the collective bargaining process (Johnson, 2007). Thus the provisions of the ADA and NLRA may conflict. Furthermore, unlike Title VII, the "ADA does not contain an exception for collectively bargained seniority systems. Most...

...

Johnston. (2007). The ADA and Collective Bargaining Issues. DLRP.
Retrieved 10 Jun 2007 at http://www.dlrp.org/html/publications/employment/otherlaws/collective_bargaining.html

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Laurie M. Johnston. (2007). The ADA and Collective Bargaining Issues. DLRP.

Retrieved 10 Jun 2007 at http://www.dlrp.org/html/publications/employment/otherlaws/collective_bargaining.html


Cite this Document:

"ADA When A Reasonable Accommodation" (2007, June 10) Retrieved April 18, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/ada-when-a-reasonable-accommodation-37271

"ADA When A Reasonable Accommodation" 10 June 2007. Web.18 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/ada-when-a-reasonable-accommodation-37271>

"ADA When A Reasonable Accommodation", 10 June 2007, Accessed.18 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/ada-when-a-reasonable-accommodation-37271

Related Documents

fall into the "reasonable accommodation" category of less than $500 would be things like modifying work schedules, reassigning workers to different tasks or departments, restructuring jobs, making facilities accessible, and providing interpreters or readers. It is very important that Muslims have protection because employers are not allowed to discriminate against any religion. Whether the employer agrees with or likes the religion does not matter. That employer must not discriminate against

Human Resources: Equal Employment Opportunity & HRM "Reasonable accommodations" are required by law for protected groups such as those based on disabilities and religion. The nature and specificity of those accommodations may differ according to the protected group. In addition, the showing of "undue hardship" that may relieve an employer from providing reasonable accommodations can differ according to the protected group. Finally, the agencies enforcing "reasonable accommodations" can differ but also

For example, as a sales representative, if I were to slip on a slick office floor while representing the company, I would be entitled to worker's compensation while I was unable to come to work while my broken leg was being treated. Then, my physical therapy should also be accommodated by my work schedule and medical bills and physical therapy related to my injury would be covered as well.

ADA Today and Its Application Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, which took effect July 26, 1992, stops private employers, state and local governments, employment agencies and labor unions from discriminating against qualified individuals with disabilities in job application procedures, hiring, firing, advancement, compensation, job training, and other terms, conditions and privileges of employment. An individual with a disability is a person who, according to the EEOC: Has

However, the police department must be careful to not preclude the ADA applicants from those jobs to which they can be ascribed and hired for with little to no reasonable accommodations because not allowing or considering such reasonable accommodations can indeed be construed a violation of the law so the hiring managers and associated forensic psychologists need to be very careful (ADA, 2013). It may seem to some people including

Sheriff Jones caused an internal investigation to b conducted. The investigation found that Smith has not violated any law or policies of the department and further did not violate any rule regarding the use of fire arms. After all these findings disciplinary charges were made against Smith and were awarded with 30 days suspension. After a due process hearing the board which went into the issue concluded that Smith was