Gun owners should be forced to lock their guns in order to limit the access of kids to them, instead of limiting the gun ownership drastically.
Another argument in favor of bearing arms is that this is a right granted by the Second Amendment, which states that "A well regulated Militia, being necessary for the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." So, people should be allowed to keep and bear arms as a measure of self-protection. As a well-organized police force is needed to maintain security, so is the right of citizens to bear arms needed to protect themselves. (Brent, 2000)
Individuals should have the right to bare guns because such a measure permits them to defend themselves and not to become victims of attackers that take advantage of their weakness. Instead of being a measure that sustains violence, allowing citizens to bare arms is a measure that decreases the criminality rate. American citizens have the right of individual freedom and not respecting their rights to protect themselves is a serious brake of their rights granted by the Constitution of the United States.
Another important issue in favor of the right to bear arms is that such a practice is traditional in the American society. Americans traditionally bare arms for self-protection and this measure more likely discourages criminals than encourages violent use of fire arms.
With Americans being unable to protect themselves, they are forced to rely more on the police and this would call for more police officers that would have to deal with a greater number of violence acts reported. Today, many citizens that use their guns to defend themselves do not report the incidents to the police. Many people use guns to defend themselves against a threat and it is not necessary for them to actually fire that gun, so they believe that there is unnecessary to report the case. Not being able to hold a gun, all these citizens would have to count on the police and this would increase the number of assault cases that the police would have to deal with.
The most important shortcoming is that with such a measure, criminals can also purchase fire arms and then use them to attack someone else. But it is a well-known fact that criminals have their ways of purchasing guns illegally. So why should law-abiding citizens be refused the right to defend themselves, especially that this category of people does not have the means to buy a gun illegally, while criminals do. The right to bare arms does not apply to all citizens that want to purchase one - people that have criminal records or that have psychological problems are not allowed to purchase a weapon, so at least in theory, owning a gun is only available to citizens that do not represent a problem to society.
It is important not to forget that the American society is based on values of protection of individual rights and baring arms is the right of every law-abiding citizen to ensure his and his family's protection.
Lott, John R., More guns, less crime, in Taking Sides, edited by McKenna, George and Feingold, Stanley, published by McGraw-Hill/Dushkin, Iowa, 2005.
The main point of the article is that access to guns has a role of deterring crime and that allowing citizens to bare arms is absolutely necessary so that citizens can defend themselves.
This source relates to my other sources because it also states that allowing citizens to bare arms is benefic for reducing crime. I would like to find more articles related to the traditional values of holding a gun in the American society.
Brent, Parker, Do individuals have the right to bear arms, April 2000, available at http://www.rense.com/general/abeararms.htm.
The main point of this article is that the ban on gun possession represents a violation on the Second Amendment and that American citizens are granted through the Constitution the right to possess guns and use them for self-protection.
This article represented a well documented source that related to my other sources on the issue of…
For the American community to open up to the less fortunate in the community, there is need to have a diverse leader and a pragmatic leader who will not only concentrate on the foreign affairs and the complex national economics and financial matrices but also on the basic misfortunes that face the average underprivileged America. The best place hence to undertake American studies that will present me with the best shots
Citizen On December 7, 1941, the nation of Japan attacked the United States at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. This began the official participation of the United States in World War II. While armed forces were overseas fighting the nation's enemies, the United States government was trying to decide whether or not any group of people within America itself could be working for the other side. Out of this fear came one of
As Margaret Atwood points out, Americans have as much to be ashamed of as to be proud of. When Barbara Kingsolver claims "The values we fought for and won there are best understood, I think, by oil companies," she refers to the way the American flag has been distorted. The issues the flag symbolizes, such as freedom and liberty, are myths for many people. As Kingsolver points out, the American
American Civil Liberties Union (Friend or Foe) America was founded on the astute principles of democracy and the potential benefits of freedom it derives. America, unlike many of its foreign counterparts has long recognized the benefits of individual rights, freedoms and privileges and has fought to the death to protect them. Currently, America aims to spread these principles of democracy around the globe in an effort to create a better quality of
Baltimore Advertiser, 18 Mar 1788) (2) the second class was reported as comprised by "those descriptions of men who are certainly more numerous with us than in any other part of the globe. First, those men who are so wise as to discover that their ancestors and indeed all the rest of mankind were and are fools. We have a vast overproportion of these great men, who, when you tell
American Democracy Voter Turnout in 1988 American Presidential Election: Democracy is for the people and by the people and it can be successful if people participate effectively in electing their representatives. In 1988, presidential elections were held in United States of America. Statistics shows that voter turnout for this presidential election was very low. Voter turnout was as low as 50.1%. In spite of an increasing trend of voter turnouts in the