American Law

Miranda Rights The American justice system is one of the most developed in the world. Indeed, any person in the United States can be assured that, whenever something legally dubious happens, he or she will have a day in court during which the case will be heard and tried according to a clear and consistent set of laws. The justice system is one of the components of the American legal system that ensures that all individuals in the country are treated according to a fair and consistent system of law.

One of the ways in which this consistency is ensured is by means of the Miranda rights. The Miranda rights have become so prominent in American law that almost all other countries are aware of them. Therefore, it is a common component of arrest to "read the rights" of a person who is being taken into custody. The Miranda rights are an important component of criminal justice, regardless of who arrests an individual.

Hence, even a private security officer who arrests an individual should be required to read Miranda rights because they act as officers of the law, they should promote public protection, and they are the harbingers of public faith. Even private security personnel act as officers of the law when they carry out arrests. To ensure consistency in the American legal system, they should therefore be required, by law, to read Miranda rights when carrying out an arrest.

Reading the Miranda rights of an arrested individual is a legal requirement of police and highway patrol officers, sheriffs and U.S. Marshalls, all federal agents, probation and parole officers, and even park rangers (Komisaruk, 2007). It therefore makes little sense to make the Miranda rights a non-requirement for any individual with the powers of arrest. To be legally consistent, any individual with the powers of arrest should be required to read the Miranda rights to an individual being arrested.

Hence, it makes little sense to make exceptions for any individuals with the powers of arrest. As such, the public relies on the protection of those with the powers of arrest. All officials who have the power to arrest an individual should be absolutely focused on public protection. Individuals who are being arrested are as entitled to protection as the rest of the public.

Hence, reading the Miranda rights to such individuals ensures that they are protected not only from abuse of the law but also from false or unfair arrest. Such individuals are protected by law from actions such as torture or the lack of legal representation when offering confessions. Anyone who is arrested for any reason has the right to legal representation and a fair trial before being sentenced. The Miranda rights play a key role in this.

It therefore makes little sense to give anybody with the right to arrest others the right not to read an individual his or her Miranda rights. Finally, the Miranda rights play an important role in public faith. The public's faith in the justice system should be stimulated in order to ensure that the system works effectively.

Without faith in the system, it is most likely that the public will succumb to a sense of anarchy, or at least that criminal individuals will simply do as they wish without regard for the law (Benoit, 2011). In conclusion, the criminal justice system can only work effectively with the assistance of the public. If the public has no trust or faith in a system in.