Apocalypse Now And Heart Of Darkness Essay

PAGES
4
WORDS
1481
Cite
Related Topics:

Breaking on through to the Other Side and Passing Judgment in Heart of Darkness and Apocalypse Now Redux: A River Journey to Hell and Back The river journeys in Conrad’s Heart of Darkness and Copolla’s Apocalypse Now Redux are journeys into Hell—journeys that provide revelations on the horror of the modern world. Marlowe and Willard represent two different takeaways from these journeys, however. Marlowe’s journey is up the Congo; Willard’s is up a fictional river into Cambodia. Both are looking for Kurtz, and for both Conrad and Coppola the jungle rivers serve as opportunities to reflect on the madness at the heart of modernity as it dares to dance with untamed wilderness without moral protection. Even Dante had the help of Virgil as the poet descended into Hell. In the river journeys in these two works, there is no moral guide, no moral protection, no moral mooring. Marlowe himself becomes the reluctant voice of morality when he lauds Kurtz for identifying the “horror”—a thing the reader suspects Marlowe would like very much to do himself but cannot because he has adopted a distant and somewhat aloof disposition towards the “droll” comedy that he calls life (Conrad, 2009, p. 65). For Willard, his participation in the horror—but mainly his hacking to death of Kurtz—is what suddenly prompts his awakening. He spends the entire film asleep, as though like a Manchurian candidate obeying the signals given him from on high. By the end of the film, he throws down his murder weapon and departs the jungle with the musings of Kurtz under his arm, indicating that he will study the moral teachings of the man who identified the “horror.” Willard goes from somnolent stooge of the state to wakeful student of the deceased. Marlowe goes from aloof, nonchalant, sailor-for-hire, to messenger of the other side—of the reality that there exists another side—of the need for an acknowledgement that what the modern world is missing is moral judgment. Unfortunately, it takes Conrad and Coppola a trip into Hell up rivers into the wild jungle to finally break on through to the other side.

In Conrad’s Heart of Darkness there is the “bond of the sea” that establishes the familiarity,...

...

1). In Coppola’s Apocalypse Now Redux, there is an altogether different bond that opens the film: it is the bond of blood, the bond of war—a bond in which a pound of flesh is to be extracted by the horror personified deep in the territory of the Viet Cong as Willard sails up river to find his target. There is no appreciation, fondness or familiarity among Willard and his crew—only a sense of foreboding and fear; a feeling of confusion as everything—every encounter—seems a foreshadowing of the stark-raving madness they will encounter once they finally reach Kurtz’s camp, where Kurtz’s mad disciple, the photographer, serves as a kind of anti-John the Baptist, denouncing Chef’s judgment of Kurtz’s mental state with a fawning tribute to the Colonel’s esoteric methods: “If you could have heard the man just two days ago, if you could’ve heard him then. God. You were gonna call him crazy?” (Coppola, 2001). What makes the photographer’s remark so meaningful is that it gets to the utter hypocrisy of Willard and his mission: he and his crew are no more or less sane than the man Willard has been sent to kill. Kurtz, in fact, serves as a kind of double for Willard, who has already displayed his own cold-bloodedness in the execution of the Vietnamese peasant woman on the sampan in order to get on with the mission following the harrowing “blow up” of his armed crew over a perceived threat that is actually a puppy. The irony there is thick—and it too foreshadows the irony of the end of the film—i.e., that Kurtz has broken through to the other side, has seen the horror—and instead of being lauded for defining it, as happens in Conrad’s book when Marlowe sings his praise of Kurtz, Coppola’s Kurtz is executed for his pronouncement.
Earlier on the river, Willard’s cold execution of the Vietnamese woman gets a “fuck you” and a “fuck them” from Chef, who, in spite of the momentary insanity that grips him in the sampan,…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Conrad, J. (2009). Heart of Darkness. CT: Dover.

Coppola, F. F. (2001). Apocalypse Now Redux. LA: Miramax Films.



Cite this Document:

"Apocalypse Now And Heart Of Darkness" (2018, July 16) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/apocalypse-now-heart-of-darkness-essay-2170022

"Apocalypse Now And Heart Of Darkness" 16 July 2018. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/apocalypse-now-heart-of-darkness-essay-2170022>

"Apocalypse Now And Heart Of Darkness", 16 July 2018, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/apocalypse-now-heart-of-darkness-essay-2170022

Related Documents

Okonkwo's journey is one of self-imposed exile. So, too, is the journey of the Kurtz character in Conrad's Heart of Darkness and Coppola's Apocalypse Now. Thus, Kurtz takes the place of the protagonist as being the symbolic character catalyst in Heart of Darkness and Things Fall Apart. The Kurtz character is more similar to the Okonkwo character than either Marlow or Willard. For this reason, Kurtz can be considered a

Willard's internal trauma is representative of the shock many Americans must have felt at seeing the violence inflicted in their name, and thus his killing of Kurtz represents a kind of superficial destruction of the "bad seed" that supposedly tainted the otherwise respectable and honorable American military. By focusing on the "primitive" evil embodied by Kurtz, the film allows the more "subtle and civilized manifestations of evil" in the form

Close up shots are also used in this sequence to depict the soldiers that are flying in the helicopters during the attack. By using close up shots, the camera implies that the soldiers are being seen from the point-of-view of someone that would be flying alongside the men. Additionally, when the beach is being bombed by jets -- during which Lt. Col. Kilgore gives his infamous napalm speech --

And why not?" This novella is, above all, an exploration of hypocrisy, ambiguity, and moral confusion. It explodes the idea of the proverbial choice between the lesser of two evils. As the idealistic Marlow is forced to align himself with either the hypocritical and malicious colonial bureaucracy or the openly malevolent, rule-defying Kurtz, it becomes increasingly clear that to try to judge either alternative is an act of folly: how

Real Hearts Going After Apocalypses Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad was one of the first works of fiction to explore modernist notions of reality, and specifically, what makes an experience "real." "Apocalypse Now" can, in many ways, be thought of as the transposition of Conrad's ideas onto a modern war. Tim O'Brien's Going After Cacciato investigates similar themes concerning mental and physical interpretations of reality and is also placed in

Heart of Darkness
PAGES 4 WORDS 1351

Heart of Darkness and Apocalypse Now Heart of Darkness The film version of Conrad's famous novel Heart of Darkness by Francis Ford Coppola entitled Apocalypse Now has been acclaimed as an important and insightful film. The novel is based on the early colonial invasion of Africa, while the film version deals with the context and the reality of the Vietnam War. However, the film follows the major themes and underlying meaning of the