Aristotle's Nichomacean Ethics And Thomas Hobbes Leviathan Term Paper


Nicomachean Ethics and Leviathan In every society, there are tens of hundreds of individuals whose personal value system leads them to leading a life based on principles of honesty, trust, fairness and compassion. To that extent, justice, as a concept can and does exist quite separate from any system of government given any number of citizens who ensure that justice is done in their dealings with their fellow humans. However, viewed from the perspective that not all members of human society necessarily adhere to similar principles, justice in a society is largely dependent on a government that upholds and enforces it. Without government and a legal system, it is more than probable that social anarchy would prevail with many humans resorting to pure self-indulgence, committing unjust and criminal acts purely for their own personal gain, with little or no regard to concepts such as the welfare of fellow citizens. Such a situation would naturally lead to the absence of justice.

A strong and good government is also needed to achieve justice since it is a concept that is multidimensional and all...


This is evident given that government and legal systems focus on achieving justice through providing each individual the right to life, liberty and equal opportunities to pursue happiness. This is done through governmental regulation of the production, utilization and conservation of natural resources, economic growth and ruling against all types of discriminatory practices. Justice, therefore, is a concept, the practice of which goes beyond just legal actions taken to punish various types of criminal behavior. Indeed, legal systems exist more in order to prevent crime and other unjust acts through holding out the threat of reprisal.
Thomas Hobbes was of the view that justice could not exist without government, based on his belief that humans, by nature, were materialistic and to that extent, worked only towards the preservation and promotion of self-interests. Given such a state, conflict inevitably arises as judgment of right and wrong is left to each individual. Hobbes therefore advocated that…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Aristotle. "Nicomachean Ethics." Translated by Ross, W.D. Retrieved Nov. 14, 2003:

Hobbes, Thomas. "Leviathan: Or, the Matter, Forme & Power of a Commonwealth, Ecclesiasticall and Civill." Cambridge University Press, 1904.

Cite this Document:

"Aristotle's Nichomacean Ethics And Thomas Hobbes Leviathan" (2003, November 14) Retrieved July 22, 2024, from

"Aristotle's Nichomacean Ethics And Thomas Hobbes Leviathan" 14 November 2003. Web.22 July. 2024. <>

"Aristotle's Nichomacean Ethics And Thomas Hobbes Leviathan", 14 November 2003, Accessed.22 July. 2024,

Related Documents

Nicomachean Ethics Aristotle said, "The good for man is an activity of the soul in accordance with virtue, or if there are more kinds of virtue than one, in accordance with the best and most perfect kind" (). According to Aristotle and his Nicomachean ethics, there are two kinds of virtue: intellectual and moral. Intellectual virtues are learned by instruction and moral virtues are learned by practice. According to his theory,

Nicomachean Ethics

Happiness in Aristotle's "Nicomachean Ethics" According to the definition of human happiness in Aristotle's "Nicomachean Ethics" the goal of human life ought to be the seeking of happiness, when pursuing all things. This may be contrasted with merely living for the sake of momentary bodily, social, or even personally gratifying pleasure. True, pleasure is often mistaken for happiness. But unlike pleasure, happiness is a moral obligation, shared by all peoples, rather

Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle explains his theory of virtue and how to become virtuous. The main premise of Aristotle's theory of virtue rests upon the ideal of the "highest good" (Nic. Ethics I 2). Aristotle defines this as happiness, or living well. After this, Aristotle goes on to determine what exactly it means to "live well." He begins this process by stating what does not constitute living well. At first

If this was the case, and this transformation of reasoning did occur, then that person would be truly virtuous. There are many strengths to Aristotle's argument, as well. One of the main strengths is the discussion of the two kinds of virtue - the kind that comes from habit, and the kind that comes from learning. This would work to demonstrate why some people change so much as they grow

Acting in accordance with virtuous principles is a key to attaining happiness. In Book Three of the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle explains the difference between voluntary and involuntary action as well as total passivity. In the first chapter of the book, the philosopher explains the importance of free will and taking action in determining ethical behavior. Aristotle concludes that the only truly ethical acts are those that are chosen by

These [bad effects of pleasure and pain] are the reason why people actually define the virtues as ways of being unaffected and undisturbed [by pleasures and pains]" (1104b21-25) It is not imperative to remain indifferent or unaffected by both pleasure and pain to be virtuous, it is only essential that we have the right feelings of pleasure and pain at the right time. Therefore, he goes on defining virtue as