¶ … Treatment of Criminal Offenders
As a clinician, how can you apply the knowledge you gained from this course to more effectively serve your clients?
A connection has been established by researchers between brutal and violent susceptibility to impair a particular area of the brain. Till date, several evidence, have assisted to bring into limelight the shady aspect of human attitude and might pave the way for important interference. For instance, several types of spontaneous aggression might be a result of defective balancing of emotion within the prefrontal cortex of the brain, the centre of superior intellectual activities like judgment, analysis and substantial control of impulses. The degree of malfunctions in the core circuits of the brain related to aggressive behavior and if these circuits are capable of being repaired is of course debatable. Researchers have mentioned that individuals inclined to violence have structured blueprints in the brain that can be reported through a scan and which is capable of remedied with medications and other separate treatment procedures. A majority of people's brain can control sudden gushes of emotions like anger or sudden fear. This restraining capability gets short-circuited in case of pathologically aggressive individuals. (Jacobs; Azmitia, 1992)
Lot of research has revealed that this reconnection can be viewed in photographs like positron emission tomography scans. Richard Davidson and his associates have reported that the sudden and affective violence might be the outcome of a loss of regulation of emotion. They stated that restraining of emotions can be done by ordinary people, and react to signals from other people, like expressions of fright. They have written suggesting that people of an aggressive nature and violence possess a defect in the central circuitry controlling these adaptive behavioral policies. Davidson along with his associates, assessed studies, inclusive of several of their own, comprising violent persons with hostile personality disorder, brain injuries sustained during childhood and killers who are convicted. They evaluated their brain function with people who are non-violent. They found defects in the same spot of the brain in forty-one murderers, in a group affected with personality disorders which are aggressively impulsive and in some individuals having personality disorders which are evil to society. (McGuire, 2002)
It was repeatedly found that the same spot of the brain was the culprit. They also wrote regarding the review of the proof indicating that the orbitofrontal cortex and the substances with which it is interlinked, inclusive of other prefrontal regions, the amygdale and the anterior cingulated cortex form the vital components of the circuit that governs the control of emotion. Sudden impulsive flare-ups are controlled by the orbital frontal cortex, whereas the anterior cingulate cortex employs different areas of the brain in reacting to disagreement. The amydala, an almond shaped form connected with fear and other emotions is also a vital element. In aggressive individuals, its functioning basically went beyond control, but in case of normal people other areas of the brain helped it cool down. (McGuire, 2002)
Impairment in the serotonin functions in the areas of the prefrontal cortex might be particularly vital. Serotonin is a vital information transmitting hormone called as neurotransmitter, connected with temper and emotion. Anti-depressant medicines attack this region. Genetics and environment are possibly implicated and chances are there to reconnect these defective circuits with the help of drugs or psychological treatment. Our existing knowledge on brain agility and the reality that the brain can actually modify reacting to experience, we have sufficient causes to anticipate that these cure might, truly, have favorable impact.
The efficacy of the treatment is dependent on harmonizing the categories of treatment and counselor to categories of delinquents. This is partly because of the property of responsivity- nature of the delinquents influence the manner of reacting to a counselor or treatment procedure. The fundamental presumption highlighting the property of responsivity is of the fact that all delinquents are not identical. Though, several compartmentalizations' try to lessen the disparity among the delinquents, individual delinquents can yet be recognized through their intelligence, interactive style and passion. This individuality also impacts the manner of delinquents reacting to endeavors to alter their actions, thoughts and mind-set. Structured cognitive behavioral therapy seems to be the ideal advent for interacting with delinquents- as weighed against non-behavioral, increased relationship centered approaches. (Marshall, 1996)
Delinquents participate in a better manner when cordial therapist possessing interpersonal competencies extend the treatment to them. Treatment may, hence, be ideally seen as a component of an exhaustive risk-management strategy, especially for high-risk delinquents. Threats are not lessened by treatment...
For example, Cook County, IL, has built a network of support for juvenile female offenders within the local community. The county has developed its own gender-specific assessment and treatment guidelines and has trained youth-facing community workers on assessing juvenile offenders and recommending programming. (Juvenile Justice Journal, 1999, p. 30). Also, the county designed a pilot network of social service agencies in order to provide a community-based continuum of care. (Juvenile
Specifically, that approach must offer a method of reversing, or at least substantially reducing the impact of those factors. Furthermore, since the particular variables differ among different criminal offenders, an approach that is likely to be successful must incorporate aspects of assessment of the individual for the purposes of designing treatments that address the many different paths to criminal conduct. In that regard, Andrews (1995) offers a comprehensive set of
Criminal Law and Psychopathy I. Introduction Various studies have in the past indicated that there is a high correlation between violence/criminal behavior and psychopathy. This would largely be expected given that psychological studies into the character and disposition of psychopaths has demonstrated that the need for control (or power) as well as egocentrism, which also happen to be the dominant character traits of psychopaths, are predictors for deviant or antisocial behavior. The
This requires identification of the barriers to the readiness of the offender to change as well as the strengths of the offender that will enable their making those changes. Latessa relates that the failure of researchers and scholars to "bridge the gap among theory, research and practice" is striking and that suggestions for how promotion of change by academics and researchers include those of: (1) leave the office -- be
In the experimental community, the researchers instituted a media campaign to increase seat-belt usage, followed by increased police enforcement of the seat-belt law. It was found that the percentage of drivers using seat belts increased in the experimental community but remained stable or declined slightly in the comparison community (Piquero and Piquero, 2002). An example of the before-and-after design would be the analysis of the impact of the Massachusetts Bartley-Fox
This combination has brought about greater political support for crime victims' rights legislation and increased funding for crime victim services (Victimology Theory, 2003) There are many important questions that need to be looked at when studying victims of crime. Some of these questions include: Why was a particular person targeted for a crime? How were they targeted, or were they a victim of opportunity? What are the chances of that person becoming a
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now