Authors Used To Evaluate Their Study Rationale Essay

PAGES
3
WORDS
1023
Cite

¶ … authors used to evaluate their study rationale was a quasi-experimental, retrospective matching birth cohort. This study retrospectively analyzed demographic and immunization record data in 2006-2007. The data was gathered from 10,857 birth records of children born between April 1999 and September 2003. The researchers chose to study a Latino community located in New York City and sampled from four zip codes. Birth data was collected from the primary community hospital that serves these zip codes. The authors divided the birth study population into four groups, or cohorts. Each cohort represented birth data from children who were aged 19-35 months as of April 1st during 2002-2005. Each birth cohort was then divided into two groups: intervention and control. Demographic data was collected from the hospital database, and immunization data was collected from the New York Citywide Immunization Registry (CIR). Outcome measures included immunization timelines such as being up-to-date for a specific immunization series, and elapsed days between the last immunization dose and days overdue for the next dose. Outcome measures were analyzed using the chi-square test, unpaired 2-sample Student's t test, logistic regression and as is the case with retrospective studies, the odds ratio estimates the relative risk. 2. What was the rationale for this study?

The authors developed a community driven program, titled "Start Right," which is also a 23-partner coalition. Start Right aims to improve childhood immunization rates within the Latino community by utilizing immunization reminders, tracking, and outreach. Data has shown that these methods are the most effective methods for improving childhood immunization rates. Most of this data came from health provider driven immunization programs...

...

2008). Prior this study, the authors did not have community-specific data with which to analyze the effectiveness of their program. In the present study, the authors assess the effectiveness of Start Right using data collected from the community as a comparison rather than exclusively relying on comparison data derived from national studies.
3. Briefly outline the methodology for this study.

Prior the Start Right program's initiatives, the Latino community had childhood immunization rates below the 50th percentile for the national average (Findley, et al. 2008). Start Right's 23 partners created a community specific, bilingual information package that contained information about, and promoted, immunizations. Additionally, Start Right trained peer health educators that helped promote and educate the community about immunizations via social services, schools, and outreach as well as having provided parent reminders, and supported provider immunization delivery (see Table 1, Findley, et al. 2008). Study participants were recruited from five different state and city parenting and/or childcare assistance programs. Responsibility for tracking and enrollment were shared amongst the 23 Start Right partners.

4. What were the conclusions of the study?

The authors concluded that Start Right was an effective community driven program in improving childhood immunization and immunization completion rates within the Latino community.

5. What were the limitations of this study in regards to its applicability to the general population?

This study limited itself to solely studying the Latino community. Extrapolating these study results to the general population discounts the fact…

Sources Used in Documents:

REFERENCES

1. Findley S, et al. Effectiveness of a Community Coalition for Improving Child Vaccination Rates in New York City. Am J. Public Health. 2008;98:1959-1962.

2. Peter J. Fos (2011). Epidemiology Foundations: The Science of Public Health. San Francisco, CA.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

3. Irigoyen MM, et al. Challenges and successes of immunization registry reminders at inner-city practices. Ambul Pediatr. 2006;6(2):100-4.

4. Smith, AD. (2000). Myths and Memories of the Nation. New York: Oxford University Press.


Cite this Document:

"Authors Used To Evaluate Their Study Rationale" (2011, February 23) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/authors-used-to-evaluate-their-study-rationale-49812

"Authors Used To Evaluate Their Study Rationale" 23 February 2011. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/authors-used-to-evaluate-their-study-rationale-49812>

"Authors Used To Evaluate Their Study Rationale", 23 February 2011, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/authors-used-to-evaluate-their-study-rationale-49812

Related Documents

Caribbean use ICT How can SMEs in (Caribbean) use ICT to achieve competitive advantage? Literature Review and Conceptual Framework Conceptual Framework Research Philosophy and Paradigm Epistemology Ontology Mixed Methods Primary Data Secondary Data Sampling Techniques and Procedures Data Analysis and Techniques Qualitative Analysis Quantitative Analysis Research Ethics Codes and Policies of Research Ethics Limitations to Methodology Time Plan and Resources The emergence of information and communications technologies or ICTs has a significant influence on different industries and organizations all across the globe. ICT refers to technologies, which

Good researchers tend to pull methods out of a tool kit as they are needed" (2006, p. 54). Notwithstanding these criticisms and constraints, though, most social researchers seem to agree that classification by some type of research paradigm is a useful approach based on the need to determine which approach is best suited for a given research enterprise. In this regard, Corby concludes that, "The contested nature of research

group and the nature of the study population. Both may present limitations to the researcher that will be reflective in the study design. In a quasi-experimental study, for instance, the study design lacks a fundamental component of a customary experimental design, namely randomization of the participants into study groups. Geographic limitations or the specificity of the participation qualifications may hinder the researcher from randomizing the subjects. An ex post

To further ensure this, Ambert brought it interdependent and unbiased coders. 9. Qualitative Analyses However this is not implicit throughout the study, Anne-Marie Ambert seems to have used the cognitive styles analysis, which focuses on the future effects a past event may have upon the individual analyzed. For instance, peer abuse could materialize in conflicts with the parents, lowering grades or even failure in becoming socially integrated. The main codes were

The independent variable will be the positive reinforcement as represented by the incentive program. The study will be examined by examining increases or decreases on the overall attendance rate of students before application of an incentive program and then after the incentive program has been in effect for at least 1/2 of the school year. It is expected increases or decreases in the truancy rates will be due to

nursing client relationships and how the study is a valid research for practitioners. It has 26 sources in Harvard Style. Research titles must be limited to fifteen words. In this case the author has exceeded the limitation by one count which is negligible. The importance of relevance of the title to the body of the research is that it must collaborate with the core study area. In the first line