Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Summations by Supreme Court Justices Brennan and Blackmun clearly express why the court voted in favor of the plaintiffs in this important case. First of all, Justice Brennan maintains that the case "does not involve textbooks, or indeed any books that... students would be required to read. The only books at issue are library books (which) are optional rather than required reading." What Brennan is attempting to say is that the students at Island Trees were not being forced to read the so-called "filth," but if they chose to read these books, their rights as protected under the First Amendment allowed them to read as much or as little as they pleased.
Similarly, Justice Blackmun asserts that the books in question may not be removed from library shelves "for the purpose of restricting access to the political ideas or social perspectives" of the authors. Also, these books cannot be removed if "the actions (of the board...
disapproval of the ideas involved" in the disputed books. In other words, Blackmun is indicating that if the board members object to the content of these books, they cannot simply remove them from the shelves for this reason alone. In essence, this entire case is nothing short of plain and outright censorship, due to the fact that the board members, being very conservative and most probably very religious, find the materials objectionable and feel that no one should be allowed to read the material. However, since the First Amendment guarantees a person's right to read whatever he/she pleases, the board members do not have the right to restrict access to "objectionable" material simply because they view it as vulgar, immoral and "filthy."
References
Crutcher, Chris (2007). "Board of Ed. v. Pico." Internet. Retrieved at http://www.chriscrutcher.com/content/blogcategory/60/49.
Intervention Effectiveness Response to instruction and intervention RTI2 is reported as a general approach in education to closing the gap in achievement. RTI2 methods are constructed upon the Response to Intervention (RTI) model that was an option for schools under the 'Building the Legacy, Idea 2004 reauthorization of the individuals with Disabilities Education Act IDEA. (California Department of Education, 2011) RTI and the expanded RTI2 are reported as being based
Wireless Broadband Technology Overview of Wireless technology Presently it is quite evident to come across functioning of a sort of wireless technology in the form of mobile phone, a Palm pilot, a smart phone etc. With the inception of fast connectivity in the sphere of commerce it is customary and useful to operate from central locations communicating with the remote branches, conducting conferences in remote places, discussing with every body at every
PICOT Question and its Significance The PICOT question is: Does mindfulness meditation (I) reduce long-term risk factors and suicidal behaviors (O) among psychiatric patients (P) versus those who do not participate in the meditation programs (C)? This is of great significance to the nursing practice because psychiatric disorders are risk factors that cause an increase in the probability of a suicidal occurrence. As a result, it is imperative for psychiatric nurses
Chronic Wound Care: Nursing Assessment And Intervention Chronic Wound Care: Nursing Assessment and Intervention Chronic Wound Care: Nursing Assessment and Intervention Chronic wounds are a challenge for both the clinician and the patient. For the nurse, issues of chronic wound care include the type of wound, the condition of the patient, and presence of infections, possible antibiotic therapy, and patient education on chronic wound care management. For the patient, issues revolve around how the
On the other hand, a motive of debate was whether or not the Court should be intervening on issues that, ultimately, belong to daily operations in schools. The Court judged, however, that this was a breech to "basic constitutional values" (as in Epperson vs. Arkansas) and, in this sense, the judicial system's intervention becomes a necessity. Additionally, the Court decided that the school board's decision could not be justified by the
Hospital Falls Fall Prevention Falls are the leading cause of hospital related injuries in the United States. There are many surprising factors that affect patients in regards to hospital falls; they involve patients of all ages and over a range of different scenarios. As a result the fall incident rate has been the target of the academic world and professionals alike as inpatient falls are serious patient safety and quality issues. Fall