Canter Vs. Gardner Tests Within Essay

PAGES
1
WORDS
400
Cite
Related Topics:

108, that it is all too common for educators to uncritically accept the assertions of test creators. For example, ESL students may have difficulty with language comprehension on a science achievement test, but that does not mean that the students have difficulties with comprehending the scientific method or other grade-level scientific concepts. Despite Cantor's caveat about using individual tests as one of many forms of assessing student ability, Gardner suggests is very easy to give too much priority to specific scores. While it may seem obvious that scores should be understood...

...

Subjective test scores, like essay tests, are even more prone to error and variation because of the standards of different graders. And finally, the SAT is a paradigmatic example of a single test given a tremendous amount of weight in determining an individual's future, to the exclusion of other factors such as grades and…

Cite this Document:

"Canter Vs Gardner Tests Within" (2010, February 10) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/canter-vs-gardner-tests-within-15175

"Canter Vs Gardner Tests Within" 10 February 2010. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/canter-vs-gardner-tests-within-15175>

"Canter Vs Gardner Tests Within", 10 February 2010, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/canter-vs-gardner-tests-within-15175

Related Documents

Test Tube Babies Huxley opens his novel describing a world that is built around "…the production line of products and services, including human reproduction," writes Coleman Carroll Myron in the book Huxley's Brave New World: Essays. Huxley's narrative has scientists propagating the human species through a process which creates "standardized human beings in an assembly-line, conveyor-belt-like system" (Myron, 2008, p. 12). In his book (p. 7) a young student was "fool enough"

Tests and Measurements
PAGES 10 WORDS 3787

Tests and Measurements The activities of the classrooms are revealed to the learners, instructors and the institutions through administering normalized tests. They encompass gathered knowledge in reading, mathematics, and English for learners starting from kindergarten up to the high school level. Several instructors detest from organizing and evaluating tests and a majority of the students are scared of appearing in them. But tests are potent didactic instruments which provide at the

Simply put, as test taking strategies grow more sophisticated the validity of language tests becomes increasingly threatened, and new test designs are responded to by new strategizing. A lack of cohesion in the approaches used to study test taking strategies and to practically apply knowledge obtained through academic research is also cited as problematic (Cohen, 2006). Without an appropriate way to measure and assess test taking strategies and their impact

Test Anxiety To me, test anxiety is something more than a feeling of mild nervousness or stress when taking a test, which is a normal emotion. For many people, this nervousness can provide a type of inspiration or energy needed to perform well on a test. However, test anxiety is not a normal reaction to a test-taking situation, and goes beyond normal feelings of anticipation. In fact, for many people, test

tests are regularly used nowadays to measure intelligence Alfred Binet and Theodore Simon invented in 1905 what has come to be acknowledged as the first scale. This initial test was aimed at ?identifying children who were mildly or perhaps more seriously retarded? (Mackintosh, 2011, p. 5) by evaluating their performance and delegating specific task sets so as any average child pertaining to a given age group could solve approximately

S. Bibliography Abdal-Haqq, I. (1995, June). Professional standards development: Teacher involvement. Retrieved July 28, 2009, from ERIC Digests - ED383693: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/13/fd/a6.pdf AIR. (n.d.). Making research relevant. Retrieved July 28, 2009, from Assessment institutes for research (AIR): http://assessment.air.org/default.aspx Downing, S., & Haladyna, T. (2006). Handbook of test development. New York: Routledge. ETS. (2009). Frequently asked questions about standardized tests. Retrieved July 27, 2009, from Educational Testing Service (ETS): http://www.ets.org/portal/site/ets/menuitem.c988ba0e5dd572bada20bc47c3921509/?vgnextoid=312caf5e44df4010VgnVCM10000022f95190RCRD&vgnextchannel=8b0d253b164f4010VgnVCM10000022f95190RCRD#aretestsfair GAO. (2007). No child left behind act. Washington