Challenger Disaster Is Any One Term Paper

PAGES
2
WORDS
701
Cite
Related Topics:

As they pushed engineers to continually test the limits when it came to the launches. This is because, the leadership inside NASA and at the different subcontractors created an atmosphere that made this possible. (Gross 1997) (Space Shuttle Challenger Case Study n.d.) The Influence of the Media

Given the high profile nature of the program, meant that there were considerable pressures to be ready for the next shuttle launch. This is because, the various managers and executives wanted to maintain a favorable image of the program in the minds of the general public. The only way that this can be accomplished is through: not having these problems leaked to news media. As a result, there was pressure that was placed on: employees and managers to overlook some of the design issues. (Space Shuttle Challenger Case Study n.d.) the reason why, is because all of the negative press they would receive, if there were delays from design flaws. Once this occurred, it meant that there would be increased amounts of scrutiny over the program and its mission objectives. To avoid these kinds...

...

(Space Shuttle Challenger Case Study n.d.)
Clearly, there were a number of factors on the organizational level that contributed to the Challenger disaster to include: a lack of communication, no leadership / increased amounts of stress surrounding the project and the influence of the media. These different elements are important, because they created a culture that allowed the design flaws in O. rings to go unnoticed. This is despite the fact that engineers had concerns about: them going back to the 1970's and they were worried regarding how they reacted to cold temperatures. As a result, this means that all of these organizations played a part in contributing to the disaster.

Bibliography

Space Shuttle Challenger Case Study, n.d.

Gross, a, 1997, 'The Challenger Disaster,' Augmentation, vol. 11, 75 -- 93.

Harvard Format. http://libguides.library.uwa.edu.au/data/files2/49275/Harvard%20LibGuide%20-%20All%20Examples%20PDF.pdf

Sources Used in Documents:

Bibliography

Space Shuttle Challenger Case Study, n.d.

Gross, a, 1997, 'The Challenger Disaster,' Augmentation, vol. 11, 75 -- 93.

Harvard Format. http://libguides.library.uwa.edu.au/data/files2/49275/Harvard%20LibGuide%20-%20All%20Examples%20PDF.pdf


Cite this Document:

"Challenger Disaster Is Any One" (2011, March 14) Retrieved April 23, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/challenger-disaster-is-any-one-3534

"Challenger Disaster Is Any One" 14 March 2011. Web.23 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/challenger-disaster-is-any-one-3534>

"Challenger Disaster Is Any One", 14 March 2011, Accessed.23 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/challenger-disaster-is-any-one-3534

Related Documents

Judgment in Managerial Decision Making Almost everyone has, at some point, been a victim of groupthink -- perhaps by thinking of speaking up in a meeting, and then deciding not to, so as not to appear unsupportive of the team's stand. Although such occurrences are quite common, and may appear quite normal, they are indicative of faulty thinking. Groupthink is, in basic terms, "a phenomenon that occurs when the desire for

Space Shuttle Challenger disaster took place on January 28, 1986 as the Space Shuttle Challenger blew up into pieces just 73 seconds after its launch. The destruction blew the shuttle into flames and dust causing the death of all seven crew members. Even though the crash was a sad moment in the history of NASA and United States Space programs, it is still being studied merely to figure out

NASA After the Challenger disaster, NASA was required to make changes in the way it managed its operations. There was to be more communication and more centralization, as well as better consultation with experts in order to make sure that the shuttle did not launch when it was not safe to do so. Despite all of the alleged changes, though, further disaster occurred. This was believed to be a product of

In addition, the Rogers Commission made specific recommendations related to these issues. They suggested that NASA restructure its management system, including bringing astronauts into management positions, which will increase attention to flight safety issues. They suggested a full examination of all critical systems before conducting any more shuttle launches. They were instructed to establish an Office of Safety, Reliability and Quality control. These suggestions bring safety back to prominence in

Disasters Three Mile Island and the Challenger Disasters The series of memo's entitled "The Filthy Five from the Three Mile Island Disaster" details how a conflict over the operation of the Three Mile Nuclear Facility, between the Babcock & Wilcox Company and the operators of the Three Mile Island Nuclear facility, led to the greatest nuclear power disaster in the history of the United States. While the builders of the reactor warned

Challenger Launch Decision
PAGES 10 WORDS 2891

Challenger Launch Decision JOE KILMINSTER'S ACCOUNTABILITY IN THE CHALLENGER DISASTER On January 28, 1986, the Challenger, one of the reusable space shuttle by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration or NASA, was launched off at the John F. Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Florida but exploded 72 seconds after liftoff. The launch was approved and ordered by the management of the Morton Thiokol, Inc., an aerospace company, that manufactures solid propellant