(p.135). Finally, the author ends the chapter with a discussion of whether colonialism helped or hurt Africa.
The author makes a very valiant and effective attempt to remain neutral and to present the information in an unbiased manner. However, the author makes several assumptions about the material presented. First, the author makes the assumption that the Europeans were exploitative when the colonized Africa. While acknowledging that Europeans may have legitimately believed that they needed to spread Christianity and otherwise "civilize" Africans, the author makes it clear that these beliefs furthered their own political and economic agendas, and could not have been the sole motivating factor. Those are assumptions that, while almost certainly true, are based upon personal belief and not fact. However, the author also seems to conclude that colonialism benefitted Africa, through things such as the introduction of Western medicine. This conclusion seems weak and is based upon the assumption that, absent colonization, Africa would not have been able to incorporate some of the benefits of Western life. When one looks at superpowers such as China, which have incorporated some of the beneficial aspects of Western life without being colonized, it becomes clear that assumption is unfounded.
The document makes it clear how much colonialism changed the face of modern Africa. Until European colonized Africa, most of the continent, especially areas outside of the Middle East, were relatively primitive. The cultural changes that occurred within a few...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now