Conflict Management In A Team Setting

Team Study (Marketing E Board) Conflict & Solution In any given collective approach to an activity, there are bound to be some form of conflict, either explicit or implicit, within the team. There is need to have mechanism to identify the conflicts before they significantly interfere with the team activities and also set up tangible ways to solve the conflicts in a manner that the involved parties will be satisfied. This paper is centered around identifying the conflicts that were emergent in the marketing executive board, the reason for the emergence of the conflicts and the possible solutions to these conflicts that will permanently bring an end to the inefficiencies cause by these conflicts.

Team analysis

The marketing society meets every Monday during common hour and this particular meeting was a special one which was an adversary workshop which was led by the director of new projects. The workshop assumes the structure of lectures but with a more informal approach. The marketing E-Board meets on Tuesday night and therein, the president, the vice president and the treasurer set the tone of the meeting.

Team performance

The meetings held weekly portrayed high levels of disunity and lack of cohesion in the team. There were many people who showed up for the meeting but not all stayed to the end with many leaving after...

...

There was also a low participation among the members and lack of connection among the members where members do not know each other by name, a fact that hampered the overall performance of the team. The communication among the members was not effective and the three top officials are the ones who had the final say on who joins the E-Board.
Conflicts in the team

The most significant conflict in the team is lack of a defined goal towards which all members of the team need to focus their energy and action towards. This was prominently displayed when each member focused more on their individual committees and what needed to be done to their way and not caring for the vison of the organization. There was lack of collective approach to issues and each representative spoke of what they personally did and not what the entire committee did. The lack of common unifying goal or unawareness of the same was seen in different individuals pointing out what they have individually achieved or what their individual departments and had achieved. It is paramount to note that some of the achievements were not directly related to the organizational goals that were set and hence had little bearing in the progression of the organization. There were also other members who had the feeling that their assignments…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Thompson, Leigh. (2014). Making the Team. Chapter 2: Performance and Productivity. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Thompson, Leigh. (2014). Making the Team. Chapter 3: Performance and Productivity. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson


Cite this Document:

"Conflict Management In A Team Setting" (2015, December 12) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/conflict-management-in-a-team-setting-2159452

"Conflict Management In A Team Setting" 12 December 2015. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/conflict-management-in-a-team-setting-2159452>

"Conflict Management In A Team Setting", 12 December 2015, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/conflict-management-in-a-team-setting-2159452

Related Documents

In siding with the marketing and sales teams, my position was that accuracy and speed of the development was more critical to meeting and exceeding customer expectations. The transformational power of leadership is kin changing a culture and making it more agile, market-driven and aggressively focused on customer needs. The argument of speed and accuracy for the customer, and more importantly to hold onto them as a client, overshadowed

Conflict Management and Conflict Resolution in Literature review "The Administrative Power Grab" attempts to manage the conflict between the power that the leader posses and the ability to use that power properly. On the one hand, some leaders utilize the power that they have to act as tyrants which leads to greater conflict within the school because people believe that their opinions are not being heard or implemented into the overall

Similarly operational efficiency is crucial for control but too authoritative approach to a controlled culture is no more feasible in the current business environment because it stifles creativity and hinders employee freedom affecting overall business performance. Innovation and setting benchmarks and preparing people to achieve such high standards become the hallmark of organizations that strive for competence. Lastly cultivation culture is about stirring the lives of customers and employees

These conflicts do not affect only the people involved, but may affect an entire nation, especially in the case of the latter type of conflict. There are, indeed, many types of conflict, just as there are many potential solutions to conflict. With any kind of solution comes a good understanding of the roots of the conflict, but also of the personalities involved and how mutual respect and understanding, as well

The qualities tested by the Myers-Briggs are also those that often cause clashes between employees, such extroversion vs. introversion, thinking vs. feeling, judging vs. perceiving, and the tendency to experiencing the world through sensing vs. intuition. Taking the test helps someone who is quiet and feels fulfilled working behind a computer understand why he or she might see the world differently than someone who is a 'people person.' It should

E. Lindle 1996). Also, the conflict management design under the SBM structure does not work well under dictatorship; in fact when the principal becomes too domineering, the researches showed obvious instances of dissatisfaction amongst the staff and decreased incentive from the students to work and engage in the learning process. The conflict management design under the SBM structure is heavily dependent upon the contribution of the committees and cannot succeed