Conflict Management Negotiation Midwestern Contemporary Art Case Study After Reading Case In attempting to negotiate with the Smith's, Peggy Fischer's goal was to get the couple to make good on its promise to contribute $5 million in funding to the museum in Michigan. If they did not at least contribute the full $5 million, it would be acceptable for them to contribute some of that amount, perhaps half of it or, at the very least, $1 million dollars. In considering the negotiation, the BATNA for Fischer is the fact that if she failed to persuade the couple to contribute a substantial sum of money, she could always sue them. BATNA is something of a fall-back strategy (Venter, 2009).The value of this BATNA is the fact that the museum may have an alternative to procuring the funding it needs to get its building completed. Completing the building is one of the most important goals of the original negotiation. Therefore, the value assigned to legal action against the Smith is extremely valuable, although it is less so than getting the donation since the museum will have to pay to procure legal aid. Fischer's position is to attempt to preserve the museum and extract funds from the Smiths. However, her interests are doing so in a way that is as discreet as possible and which does not alienate other potential donors. Options for mutual gain include reducing the role of Schmidt or firing him to get the funding from the Smiths, and giving them a large part of the reward (in the form of dedicating the building or certain rooms...

Influence tactics are specifically the way that an individual can use his or her power base to produce a desired outcome. These tactics relate to various bases of power, and can be as unethical as coercion or as ethical as rank and authority. An example of the latter is for a policeman to influence people based on the former's standing as an officer of the law. There are a variety of influence tactics that Peggy Fischer has in regards to the situation described in the case study in which she is attempting to procure a $5 million dollar pledge from Peter and Catherine Smith.
Specifically, if I were Smith, I believe that she should utilize what is known as expert influence tactics. Expert influence tactics are those which pertains to an individual particular area of expertise and specialization. It is clear that Fischer has a highly valued skillset, one which allows her to relate well with others. This fact is alluded to in the case study since "Fischer was chosen as the next chairperson because of her ability to establish excellent interpersonal relationships among board members" (Case study). This passage suggests that if Fischer simply communicates with the Smiths that she would be able to convey how badly the museum needs the money and how important it is for them to issue the funds. It also appears that Smith could utilize information, reward, and connection influence tactics. After all, she does have a professional relationship with…